Reginald Bourn

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2023-0288
Date of Report 8 August 2023
Coroner Caroline Topping
Coroner Area Surrey
Response Deadline est. 3 October 2023
All 3 responses received · Deadline: 3 Oct 2023
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
There is a critical lack of national guidance and training for the safe insertion and placement confirmation of nasogastric decompression tubes, unlike feeding tubes, risking fatal misplacement.
View full coroner's concerns
1. The expert and clinical evidence was that the insertion of any nasogastric tube is complicated and misplacement into a lung can occur because of the proximity of the trachea to the oesophagus.
2. Examples of nasogastric decompression tubes and nasogastric feeding tubes were provided in evidence. The feeding tubes have instructions both as to how to insert them and as to how to ensure that they are correctly placed. The decompression tubes have neither.
3. The expert evidence was that there is national guidance in relation to the placement of nasogastric feeding tubes but not nasogastric decompression tubes. However, as exemplified by this case, misplacement of either can prove fatal.
4. The clinicians who investigated the death could not find any nationally recognised protocols dealing with the use of, and training on the insertion of, nasogastric decompression tubes nor for checking whether they are appropriately placed.
5. The Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch independent report 12019/006 made recommendations in December 2020 on the placement of feeding nasogastric tubes. It found that the use of pH strips is potentially unreliable and incorrect X ray confirmation and interpretation is the most common cause of misplacement incidents.
6. One of the recommendations made was for a national standardised competency-based training programme for nasogastric tube placement and confirmation by pH testing.
7. It appears that there is no suggested training nor national guidance in relation the placement of nasogastric decompression tubes.
Responses
NHS England NHS / Health Body
8 Aug 2023
Action Planned
While NHS England does not routinely provide guidance on nasogastric decompression tubes, they have asked regional colleagues to raise awareness of the concerns raised in the report and learnings from the case with their regional Integrated Care Boards, which can then engage with local NHS Trusts. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Coroner,

Re: Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths – Reginald Edwin Bourn who died on 24 February 2022.

Thank you for your Report to Prevent Future Deaths (hereafter “Report”) dated 8 August 2023 concerning the death of Reginald Edwin Bourn on 24 February 2022. In advance of responding to the specific concerns raised in your Report, I would like to express my deep condolences to Reginald’s family and loved ones. NHS England are keen to assure the family and the coroner that the concerns raised about Reginald’s care have been listened to and reflected upon.

In your Report, some of your concerns related to the lack of instructions, national guidance, and protocols/training on the insertion of nasogastric decompression tubes. I will address these within the realms of NHS England’s statutory powers, roles and responsibilities. Where I am unable to assist, I hope to provide you with some direction on either where such information can be obtained or from what organisation.

Whilst NHS England would not routinely provide national guidance on the insertion of nasogastric decompression tubes, there is existing national guidance in the form of the Royal Marsden Manual, who have particular expertise in this area. The manual has a section on ‘Insertion of a nasogastric drainage tube’ which contains background information and specific procedural guidance for the insertion and removal of these tubes, including around pH testing. This is aimed at clinical nursing staff who would routinely be the staff responsible for placing nasogastric tubes in patients. The Manual is a well-known guide for nurses to deliver clinically effective, patient-focused, and evidence-based care.

You raised concern about some nasogastric tubes having product instructions and others not. Product instructions for the use of nasogastric decompression/drainage tubes would not sit within the remit of NHS England. The Coroner may wish to refer this concern to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) as they would be the organisation responsible for issuing the relevant instructions. NHS England will be happy to support the MHRA with the dissemination of any new instructions/guidance to relevant healthcare professionals.

In your Report, you also raised the concern that a Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch independent report 12019/006 found that the use of pH strips is potentially unreliable and incorrect X-ray confirmation and interpretation is the most common National Medical Director NHS England Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

27 December 2023

cause of nasogastric tube misplacement incidents. It recommended national standardised competency-based training for nasogastric tube placement and confirmation by pH testing.

The National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) are the statutory body who lead on developing and disseminating clinical guidance and I note that you have also sent your Report to them. NHS England will carefully consider NICE’s response to you and any actions that may be required from us as a result.

As to national training provisions around insertion of nasogastric tubes, I asked my colleagues from the national Workforce, Training and Education (WTE) Directorate at NHS England to consider your Report and the concerns raised. They advised that such a training programme would not come under NHS England’s remit. Individual NHS Trusts are responsible for the implementation of locally recommended practice and protocols, including the staffing and availability of workforce. You may wish to engage with Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust for further information on their specific practice and protocols regarding placement of nasogastric tubes.

What is clear from your Report is that there does appear to be some inconsistency of understanding and awareness around instructions or guidance on the insertion of nasogastric decompression tubes. Considering this, NHS England has asked regional colleagues to ensure that they raise awareness of what happened in Reginald’s care, the concerns raised in your Repot and the learnings with their regional Integrated Care Boards (ICBs). ICBs are responsible for planning and commissioning health services for their local populations and will be able to engage with their respective local NHS Trusts and NHS providers on this matter to ensure that there is understanding of guidance and information available.

I would also like to provide further assurances on national NHS England work taking place around the Reports to Prevent Future Deaths. All reports received are discussed by the Regulation 28 Working Group, comprising Regional Medical Directors, and other clinical and quality colleagues from across the regions. This ensures that key learnings and insights around preventable deaths are shared across the NHS at both a national and regional level and helps us pay close attention to any emerging trends that may require further review and action.

Thank you for bringing these important patient safety issues to my attention and please do not hesitate to contact me should you need any further information.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Other
27 Oct 2023
Action Planned
NICE has shared the report with its topic selection and prioritisation team to consider guidance on small bowel obstruction and nasogastric decompression. The report has also been shared with NICE’s guideline surveillance team to see if an update to recommendations on nutrition support for adults is required. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Topping,

I write in response to your regulation 28 report regarding the sad death of Reginald Edwin Bourn. I would like to express my sincerest condolences to his family.

We have considered the circumstances surrounding Mr Bourn’s death and I have addressed below the matters of concern on which NICE can comment.

Lack of national guidance on the placement of nasogastric decompression tubes

In your report you explained that while there is national guidance in relation to the placement of nasogastric feeding tubes, there is not the same for nasogastric decompression tubes.

NICE has not published guidance on the management of small bowel obstruction, and so has not made recommendations on nasogastric decompression. Your report has been shared with our topic selection and prioritisation team to consider the need for NICE guidance in this area.

Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch (HSIB) report on the placement of nasogastric feeding tubes

You expressed concern that the HSIB made recommendations on the placement of nasogastric feeding tubes, having found that the use of pH strips is potentially unreliable and that incorrect X-ray confirmation and interpretation is the most common cause of misplacement incidents.

In the NICE guideline on nutrition support for adults: oral nutrition support, enteral tube feeding and parenteral nutrition [CG32] we recommend that:

The position of all nasogastric tubes should be confirmed after placement and before each use by aspiration and pH graded paper (with X-ray if necessary) as per the advice from the National Patient Safety Agency (2011); further patient safety alerts for nasogastric tubes have also been issued in 2013 and 2016. Local protocols should address the clinical criteria that permit enteral tube feeding. These criteria include how to proceed when the ability to make repeat checks of the tube position is

Page | 2

limited by the inability to aspirate the tube, or the checking of pH is invalid because of gastric acid suppression. (Recommendation 1.7.17)

Both the HSIB’s report on the placement of nasogastric tubes and your report concerning the death of Mr Bourn have been shared with NICE’s guideline surveillance team to see if an update to this recommendation is required.

Instructions for nasogastric decompression tubes

On your point that ‘feeding tubes have instructions both as to how to insert them and as to how to ensure that they are correctly placed [while] decompression tubes have neither’, we believe the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) would be best placed to consider this issue as the UK’s regulator of medical devices.
Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency Other
27 Nov 2023
Action Planned
The MHRA has reached out to manufacturers of nasogastric tubing to confirm their primary intended use and to review their instructions for use, expecting to complete the initial review by 4 January 2024, after which they will work with manufacturers to update their IFU where applicable. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Topping,

: Regulation 28 Report - Reginald Edwin Bourn

I would like to thank you for your email dated 1 November 2023 regarding the Regulation 28 Report for the death of Reginald Edwin Bourn and the subsequent response from

Chief Executive, NICE, regarding instructions for nasogastric decompression tubes. I would like to express our condolences to the Bourn family and hope that the information provided below may help at this difficult time.

Firstly, it may be helpful if to provide background information relating to the MHRA and the work we carry out. The MHRA is the executive Agency of the Department of Health and Social Care that acts on behalf of the Ministers to protect and promote public health and patient safety by ensuring that medicines, healthcare products and medical equipment, including medical devices, are used safely and meet appropriate standards of safety, quality, performance, and effectiveness. The MHRA assesses the balance of risks and benefits of medical devices throughout their use in clinical practice in a process known as vigilance. This involves the collection of information and assessment of any potential risks, followed, when necessary, with communications and regulatory action to minimise those risks. Where serious incidents involving medical devices have been reported to other authorities including the Police, Coroners and the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), the MHRA provides technical expertise and facilitates independent testing if required. The MHRA ensures any concerns raised from these investigations are disseminated to the health service to prevent further incidents or taken up with the manufacturer.

Following receipt of the Regulation 28 Report we have considered point two in the matters of concern: “Feeding tubes have instructions both as to how to insert them and as to how to ensure that they are correctly placed. The decompression tubes have neither”. We have reached out to the manufacturers of nasogastric tubing to confirm their primary intended use and to review their instructions for use (IFU) for both feeding and decompression tube placement.

We expect to complete the initial review of the IFUs by 4 January 2024. Following this review, we will work with manufacturers to update their IFU where applicable. If updates are made, the MHRA is of the opinion that they should issue a Field Safety Notice (FSN) to highlight the changes to clinicians, and ensure that their staff are fully trained in the changes so that they can provide advice to clinicians where necessary.

I would like to thank you once again for raising this important safety issue to our attention and I hope the information provided is useful and I will provide a summary of any planned actions by 4 January 2024. In the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of further assistance.
Sent To
  • Health Education England
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
Response Status
Linked responses 3 of 2
56-Day Deadline 3 Oct 2023
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
An inquest into the death of Mr Reginald Edwin Bourn was opened on the 12th May 2022 and on the 19th June 2023. The inquest was concluded on the 27th June 2023. Reginald Bourn died at Frimley Park Hospital on the 24th February 2022. The cause of death was: I a Aspiration of Gastrointestinal Content I b Small Bowel Obstruction caused by either a Peritoneal Adhesion or Incarceration of an Inguinal Hernia (Resolved) The narrative conclusion was: Reginald Bourn was admitted to Frimley Park Hospital with acute abdominal pain and a distended stomach. Investigations revealed prominent small bowel loops but no transition point. He began to vomit. He was treated conservatively, and a nasogastric tube was used to decompress his stomach. On the 24th February 2022 the tube had fallen out by 4.30 by which time he no longer felt nauseous. He began to vomit again, and staff were advised to reinsert the nasogastric tube at 7.02. He was seen at a surgical ward round at 9.45 by which time the tube had not been reinserted. The plan remained for conservative treatment and decompression with a nasogastric tube. He was admitted to a surgical ward with a NEWS score of 3 at 10.20. Insertion of the nasogastric tube was effected by 11.40. The tube was misplaced into his left lung. Prior to 12.00 he suffered an acute event resulting in the aspiration of one and a half litres of stomach content into his lungs. His condition significantly worsened, his
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Bourn had an intestinal blockage on admission to hospital which required the placement of a nasogastric draining tube to decompress his stomach. The first tube came out and a second one was placed by an experienced nurse. Shortly thereafter he suffered an acute event and aspirated one and a half litres of gastrointestinal content into his left lung. A chest X ray was taken. He died shortly thereafter. When read the X ray revealed that the tube had been misplaced in the left lung. He died as a consequence of the aspiration of gastrointestinal content which was in part attributable to the fact that the misplaced tube enabled ingress to the lung of the aspirate, and in part because the stomach content had not been drained.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
Autism spectrum disorder police training
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent training on online activity assessment
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Neurodiversity training for Prevent practitioners
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Sharing information about closed Prevent referrals
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent Supervisor training on closure decisions
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent referral training for organisations
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Taxi driver duty to report criminal activity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.