Liam Lyes-Watson
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2022-0297
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 22 Nov 2022
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The report identifies that a call handler was not trained and needed advice from a colleague who did not speak to the caller, and consideration should be given to recording incoming calls to the Access Team.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) Four areas of concern are; a. The call handler on the second occasion was not trained and needed to take professional advice from a colleague which colleague did not then speak directly with the caller.
b. The apparent blanket response that they could not discuss the case with the caller yet they could take information from him.
c. With that information more should have been done.
d. Consideration should be given whether incoming calls to the Access Team should be recorded.
b. The apparent blanket response that they could not discuss the case with the caller yet they could take information from him.
c. With that information more should have been done.
d. Consideration should be given whether incoming calls to the Access Team should be recorded.
Responses
Action Taken
The call handler has discussed their working practice in supervision meetings, an aide memoire has been introduced to gather relevant information when patients call to self-refer, and a mandatory question has been added to the RiO electronic patient record to ensure all staff ask about the caller's ethnicity. (AI summary)
The call handler has discussed their working practice in supervision meetings, an aide memoire has been introduced to gather relevant information when patients call to self-refer, and a mandatory question has been added to the RiO electronic patient record to ensure all staff ask about the caller's ethnicity. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Ellery,
RE: Liam Joseph Lyes-Watson (deceased)
Report to Prevent Future Deaths
Thank you for your letter dated 27th September 2022, reporting a matter to us, in accordance with Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
May I take this opportunity to reassure you that following Mr Lyes-Watson’s death, we undertook a thorough investigation into the care delivered by the Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust.
MATTER OF CONCERN:
The four areas of concern were:
a. The call handler on the second occasion was not trained and needed to take professional advice from a colleague which colleague did not then speak directly with the caller.
b. The apparent blanket response that they could not discuss the case with the caller yet they could take information from him.
c. With that information more should have been done.
d. Consideration should be given whether incoming calls to the Access Team should be recorded.
Following discussions within the mental health services in the Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin Care Group and with corporate services, I am now in a position to respond to the specific concerns raised during the course of the inquest.
a. The call handler on the second occasion was not trained and needed to take professional advice from a colleague which colleague did not then speak directly with the caller.
2 Response:
The Call Handler has discussed in supervision meetings with the Quality Lead of the Access Team on a monthly basis since the Serious Incident. All concerns regarding their working practice have been addressed. These meetings also ensure all Mandatory Training is up to date and learning needs have been addressed. These meetings have led to the following further training:
• The Call Handler has attended a Stress and Resilience course to help them understand how to manage their own emotional responses to difficult calls received during their work.
• The Call Handler has attended the course provided by Zero Suicide Alliance.
• The Call Handler is due to attend the Shropshire Council’s Joint Training in Suicide Prevention Awareness along with a cohort of her peers on 28th Nov 2022.
We have reviewed the training needs for all call handlers. All new call handlers will only shadow trained colleagues until they have completed their training and then will be supervised whilst taking calls until assessed as competent by the Quality Lead.
We have reviewed the suicide prevention awareness training for call handlers and the decision has been made that all call handlers will have received the training below by the end of November 2022
held by the team manager and compliance monitored through supervision. In addition to this training, it has been agreed by the service manager that the training offered by Shropshire Council’s Joint Training in Suicide Prevention Awareness Suicide prevention | Shropshire Council is undertaken by all call handlers in the Access Team on a yearly basis and that this is built into their mandatory training for recording purposes on their electronic staff record.
The aide memoire for call handlers is also included at Annex A.
We have addressed the fact that the shift coordinator did not then speak to Mr Heaton is our response at C.
b. The apparent blanket response that they could not discuss the case with the caller, yet they could take information from him.
Response:
We have shared MPFT’s Guide to Carers Confidentiality with all the staff in the Access Team. This reinforces the message to our staff that a confidentiality breach only occurs when new, person identifiable, information is given to a third party and does not exclude gathering information from carers and providing them with support and advice. This message has been reinforced in team meetings in October 2022.
We are also developing new guidance for carers which contains a range of resources to provide support to carers in the form of a fact sheet which will include:
• Contact details of local organisations who can provide further support
• Information on how to support their family member to make a safety plan
• How to support the person they are concerned about to have “hope”
• Links to approved internet resources such as the Mental Health Foundation
• How to seek help in an emergency
c. With that information more should have been done.
Response:
3
We have further reviewed our actions in relation to the period immediately prior to Liam’s tragic death, these include:
• The Call Handler is due to attend the Shropshire Council’s Joint Training in Suicide Prevention Awareness along with a cohort of her peers on 28th November 2022.
• To allow for shift patterns the remaining Call Handlers on Access Team will undertake this training on 11th January 2023.
• The Call Handlers have been provided with MPFT’s newly published Guide to Carers Confidentiality and are awaiting the Triangle of Care Training that all staff on the Access and Crisis Teams will be undertaking to enhance their skills when communicating with family members in contact with their teams.
• We have reinforced to all call handlers that concerns raised by family members are of high significance and must be referred to the shift co-ordinator. We have stressed the importance to all shift co-ordinators that, where family are expressing concerns, they must speak to them to clinically formulate the changes in behaviours.
• We have reviewed this case with shift co-ordinators and agreed that Liam should have been referred to the Crisis Team for them to make the decision about further action.
• We recognise that the shift co-ordinator should have spoken to Mr Heaton and listened to his and Liam’s mother’s concerns. We apologise for this omission and learning from this missed opportunity has been shared with the Team to ensure all attempts are made to re- engage service users who disengage.
d. Consideration should be given whether incoming calls to the Access Team should be recorded.
The Trust and the investigator apologise for mistakenly stating that the calls to the Access Team are not recorded. All calls are recorded and are kept for audit and quality assurance and kept by the company who provides the service for 30 days. The Trust has requested that the company examine whether they can access the recording in question and will be reviewing whether calls can be kept for a longer period of time.
It is not stated on the call that the calls are recorded for training and audit purposes which is a matter that we have rectified. In future it has been agreed that when an unexpected death is reported that the relevant call will be retrieved immediately and reviewed as a part of the investigation process.
Our Health Informatics Service has confirmed that we are unable to retrieve the specific calls in relation to this case due the exceeding the period of storage for such recordings. Calls recorded are erased automatically after 30 days and are not able to be retrieved. We have changed our process and following the notification of a serious incident within 30 days of contact with MPFT, the Access Team Manager will retrieve the calls related to the case and secure them in preparation for any subsequent investigation.
4 I hope this response helps to address your concerns. However, if you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.
RE: Liam Joseph Lyes-Watson (deceased)
Report to Prevent Future Deaths
Thank you for your letter dated 27th September 2022, reporting a matter to us, in accordance with Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013.
May I take this opportunity to reassure you that following Mr Lyes-Watson’s death, we undertook a thorough investigation into the care delivered by the Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust.
MATTER OF CONCERN:
The four areas of concern were:
a. The call handler on the second occasion was not trained and needed to take professional advice from a colleague which colleague did not then speak directly with the caller.
b. The apparent blanket response that they could not discuss the case with the caller yet they could take information from him.
c. With that information more should have been done.
d. Consideration should be given whether incoming calls to the Access Team should be recorded.
Following discussions within the mental health services in the Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin Care Group and with corporate services, I am now in a position to respond to the specific concerns raised during the course of the inquest.
a. The call handler on the second occasion was not trained and needed to take professional advice from a colleague which colleague did not then speak directly with the caller.
2 Response:
The Call Handler has discussed in supervision meetings with the Quality Lead of the Access Team on a monthly basis since the Serious Incident. All concerns regarding their working practice have been addressed. These meetings also ensure all Mandatory Training is up to date and learning needs have been addressed. These meetings have led to the following further training:
• The Call Handler has attended a Stress and Resilience course to help them understand how to manage their own emotional responses to difficult calls received during their work.
• The Call Handler has attended the course provided by Zero Suicide Alliance.
• The Call Handler is due to attend the Shropshire Council’s Joint Training in Suicide Prevention Awareness along with a cohort of her peers on 28th Nov 2022.
We have reviewed the training needs for all call handlers. All new call handlers will only shadow trained colleagues until they have completed their training and then will be supervised whilst taking calls until assessed as competent by the Quality Lead.
We have reviewed the suicide prevention awareness training for call handlers and the decision has been made that all call handlers will have received the training below by the end of November 2022
held by the team manager and compliance monitored through supervision. In addition to this training, it has been agreed by the service manager that the training offered by Shropshire Council’s Joint Training in Suicide Prevention Awareness Suicide prevention | Shropshire Council is undertaken by all call handlers in the Access Team on a yearly basis and that this is built into their mandatory training for recording purposes on their electronic staff record.
The aide memoire for call handlers is also included at Annex A.
We have addressed the fact that the shift coordinator did not then speak to Mr Heaton is our response at C.
b. The apparent blanket response that they could not discuss the case with the caller, yet they could take information from him.
Response:
We have shared MPFT’s Guide to Carers Confidentiality with all the staff in the Access Team. This reinforces the message to our staff that a confidentiality breach only occurs when new, person identifiable, information is given to a third party and does not exclude gathering information from carers and providing them with support and advice. This message has been reinforced in team meetings in October 2022.
We are also developing new guidance for carers which contains a range of resources to provide support to carers in the form of a fact sheet which will include:
• Contact details of local organisations who can provide further support
• Information on how to support their family member to make a safety plan
• How to support the person they are concerned about to have “hope”
• Links to approved internet resources such as the Mental Health Foundation
• How to seek help in an emergency
c. With that information more should have been done.
Response:
3
We have further reviewed our actions in relation to the period immediately prior to Liam’s tragic death, these include:
• The Call Handler is due to attend the Shropshire Council’s Joint Training in Suicide Prevention Awareness along with a cohort of her peers on 28th November 2022.
• To allow for shift patterns the remaining Call Handlers on Access Team will undertake this training on 11th January 2023.
• The Call Handlers have been provided with MPFT’s newly published Guide to Carers Confidentiality and are awaiting the Triangle of Care Training that all staff on the Access and Crisis Teams will be undertaking to enhance their skills when communicating with family members in contact with their teams.
• We have reinforced to all call handlers that concerns raised by family members are of high significance and must be referred to the shift co-ordinator. We have stressed the importance to all shift co-ordinators that, where family are expressing concerns, they must speak to them to clinically formulate the changes in behaviours.
• We have reviewed this case with shift co-ordinators and agreed that Liam should have been referred to the Crisis Team for them to make the decision about further action.
• We recognise that the shift co-ordinator should have spoken to Mr Heaton and listened to his and Liam’s mother’s concerns. We apologise for this omission and learning from this missed opportunity has been shared with the Team to ensure all attempts are made to re- engage service users who disengage.
d. Consideration should be given whether incoming calls to the Access Team should be recorded.
The Trust and the investigator apologise for mistakenly stating that the calls to the Access Team are not recorded. All calls are recorded and are kept for audit and quality assurance and kept by the company who provides the service for 30 days. The Trust has requested that the company examine whether they can access the recording in question and will be reviewing whether calls can be kept for a longer period of time.
It is not stated on the call that the calls are recorded for training and audit purposes which is a matter that we have rectified. In future it has been agreed that when an unexpected death is reported that the relevant call will be retrieved immediately and reviewed as a part of the investigation process.
Our Health Informatics Service has confirmed that we are unable to retrieve the specific calls in relation to this case due the exceeding the period of storage for such recordings. Calls recorded are erased automatically after 30 days and are not able to be retrieved. We have changed our process and following the notification of a serious incident within 30 days of contact with MPFT, the Access Team Manager will retrieve the calls related to the case and secure them in preparation for any subsequent investigation.
4 I hope this response helps to address your concerns. However, if you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sent To
- Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation trust
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
22 Nov 2022
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 1st November 2021 I commenced an investigation into the death of Liam Joseph LYES-WATSON, 26.
The inquest concluded with evidence being heard on the 19th of July 2022 with subsequent reasons in writing following a review of body worn video footage.
The conclusion of the inquest was Suicide. The medical cause of death was Ia) Fatal Opioid Toxicity
The inquest concluded with evidence being heard on the 19th of July 2022 with subsequent reasons in writing following a review of body worn video footage.
The conclusion of the inquest was Suicide. The medical cause of death was Ia) Fatal Opioid Toxicity
Circumstances of the Death
On the 26th October 2021 Liam was found deceased in , Shrewsbury, Shropshire. There were no suspicious circumstances and no evidence of third party involvement in his death.
The inquest heard that Liam had been struggling with his mental health in the weeks preceding his death. He and his mother, and subsequently his step-father, contacted the Access Team on the 20th & 25th October 2021. Following the second telephone call by Liam’s step-father the call handler said that without Liam’s consent they could not take action and if the situation was acute they should ring emergency services as they had previously done on the 20th October 2021.
The inquest heard that Liam had been struggling with his mental health in the weeks preceding his death. He and his mother, and subsequently his step-father, contacted the Access Team on the 20th & 25th October 2021. Following the second telephone call by Liam’s step-father the call handler said that without Liam’s consent they could not take action and if the situation was acute they should ring emergency services as they had previously done on the 20th October 2021.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.