David Clark
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2022-0046
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Care in ICU was not escalated appropriately despite adequate staffing, with inaccurate NEWS score calculation and generally poor clinical documentation compromising patient safety.
View full coroner's concerns
[BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] (1) That care was not escalated appropriately in ICU despite being fully staffed.
(2) That NEWS were not being calculated or documented accurately.
(3) That documentation, more generally, was poorly completed.
Coroner.service@hertfordshire.gov.uk |
(2) That NEWS were not being calculated or documented accurately.
(3) That documentation, more generally, was poorly completed.
Coroner.service@hertfordshire.gov.uk |
Part of a Series
2 separate reports were issued from this inquest, each sent to different organisations.
-
2020-0023
Sent to: Lancashire Care NHS TrustAll responded
This report (2022-0046) is shown above.
Sent To
- East & North Hertfordshire NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
12 Apr 2022
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 5th January 2020 David Clark died at the Lister Hospital and on the 10 January 2020 I commenced an investigation into his death. The investigation concluded by way of an inquest on 13 January 2022, which found: Cause of Death: 1a Type 2 Respiratory Failure 1b Pneumonia 1c Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease II Severe Ankylosing Spondylosis, Ischaemic Heart Disease and Fatty Liver Narrative Conclusion: David Clark was admitted to Lister hospital on 21 November 2019 following a fall and injury to his spine. He had a background of Ankylosing Spondylosis, severe Kyphoscoliosis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, was on long term home oxygen and used a non-invasive ventilator (NIV) machine at night. He was transferred to Addenbrookes hospital but found not suitable for surgical intervention and transferred back to Lister hospital and then discharged to Queen Victoria Memorial on 21 December 2019 for rehabilitation. He was re-admitted to Lister hospital on 3 January 2020 drowsy and in respiratory failure. No Respiratory Support Unit (RSU) bed was available on the 4 January 2020. On the afternoon of the 5 January 2020 a bed was made available on ward 11a, close to the RSU, and he was transferred but on arrival he was found to be deceased. During his stay at Queen Victoria Memorial hospital he was unable to use his NIV machine as intended. When he returned to the Lister hospital his NIV machine was not moved with him and had to be collected by members of the family. His worsening condition was not accurately assessed, and his treatment was not appropriately escalated. It is not clear, however, whether these matters contributed to his death.
Coroner.service@hertfordshire.gov.uk |
Coroner.service@hertfordshire.gov.uk |
Circumstances of the Death
During the inquest I heard evidence from a number of medical witnesses: Dr , pathologist; Dr , Medical Director QVMH; , Cons. Neurosurgeon; Prof, Cons. Respiratory Physician; Dr , Cons. ICU; Dr provided an RCA report.
From the evidence, a number of failings were identified in relation to the care received by Mr Clark. As outlined above, it is not clear whether they contributed to his death, but they present a wider concern for the provision of future care.
Despite being significantly unwell on his return to Lister hospital on the 3rd February 2020 his care was not escalated in a timely fashion. Consultant review only took place 24 hours after his admission. I heard that, at the time, there was a full complement of staff.
The evidence suggests that NEWS, a fundamental aspect of patient care, were not being calculated or recorded accurately.
Mr Clark’s treatment and course through the hospital was poorly documented. Poor documentation makes treatment by following clinicians difficult and also investigation following a death or adverse event more difficult.
From the evidence, a number of failings were identified in relation to the care received by Mr Clark. As outlined above, it is not clear whether they contributed to his death, but they present a wider concern for the provision of future care.
Despite being significantly unwell on his return to Lister hospital on the 3rd February 2020 his care was not escalated in a timely fashion. Consultant review only took place 24 hours after his admission. I heard that, at the time, there was a full complement of staff.
The evidence suggests that NEWS, a fundamental aspect of patient care, were not being calculated or recorded accurately.
Mr Clark’s treatment and course through the hospital was poorly documented. Poor documentation makes treatment by following clinicians difficult and also investigation following a death or adverse event more difficult.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
CDI patient observations records
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Missed and inaccurate patient observations
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Improve perinatal mortality recording
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Detainee Capture and Condition Records
Al-Sweady Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.