Heike Mojay-Sinclare

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2021-0313
Date of Report 17 September 2021
Coroner Peter Nieto
Response Deadline ✓ from report 12 November 2021
All 1 response received · Deadline: 12 Nov 2021
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Lack of mandatory standards and inspection for river ford depth gauges, combined with poor inter-agency information sharing on previous incidents, creates significant safety risks, especially with increasing severe rainfall.
View full coroner's concerns
The MATTERS OF CONCERNS are as follows: 1. The inquest heard that with regard to water depth gauges, specifically for river fords, the Traffic Signs and General Directions 2016 removed prescription of the type of signs to be used and the requirement for their use at river ford crossings. Those requirements were in the previous 2002 Directions. There s relevant guidance (Ch.4 Traffic Signs Manual) but this is not mandatory and leaves enactment to the discretion of the relevant local authority. As water depth gauges are outside of the regulatory regime there may be fords without gauges, or where they are installed they may be sub-optimal and deficient. There is also lack of clarity for local authorities and the lack of a prescribed design and standard means that manufacturers do not have an approved design to work to and provide to local authorities.
2. The inquest heard that river fords and depth gauges do not currently lie within mandatory highways inspection requirements and therefore there is no guarantee of their maintenance and review, and therefore no guarantee that they continue to provide on-going usability and safety.
3. The inquest heard that there were a number of previous serious incidents which it appears were not notified to the relevant local authority, and that if they had been there would likely have been a review of measures relating to the river ford. A mandatory requirement for inter-agency information sharing in these circumstances is indicated. Please note that these concerns are raised within the context of what appear to be increasingly frequent severe rainfall and flooding events.
Responses
Dpeartment for Transport Central Government
18 Nov 2021
Noted
The Department for Transport clarified that local authorities are responsible for hazard signage and highway maintenance, and that existing guidance is available but not mandatory. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Peter, Thank you for your letter of 20 September 2021 and the accompanying report into the fatal accident near Ashbourne in Derbyshire. was deeply saddened to learn of the death of Mrs Mojay-Sinclare. You raised a number of concerns in your letter which have addressed below. 1, With regard to signing; | should first clarify that it is the responsibility of local authorities t0 ensure hazards on their network are identified and appropriately signed to warn drivers Traffic signs warning of a ford ahead are prescribed in the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016, and available for local authorities to use without reference to the Department: Advice on their use is given in Chapter 4 of the Traffic Signs Manual 2 The water depth gauge was prescribed in the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002, but the decision to place them at any site would have still been at the discretion of the local authority. Their use was not mandated by this Department. There is relevant guidance on the use of the water depth gauge in Chapter 4 of the Traffic Signs Manual, including a diagram showing dimensions and appearance which can be used by manufacturers. should stress that is guidance issued by the Department as "good practice guidance" and provides local authorities advice on working practices which can choose to adopt or choose to ignore Local authorities do not have to conform to good practice guidance; good they

however the Department believes that conformance to the guidance is desirable. 3 With regards to highways inspection requirements , local highway authorities have a duty, under section 41 of the Highways Act 1980,to maintain the highway network in their area The Act does not set out specific standards of maintenance; as it is for each individual local highway authority to assess which parts of its network are in need of repair and what standards should be applied, based upon their local knowledge and circumstances. The Government has no powers to override local decisions in these matters or intervene in these kinds of local issues: That said the Government does support the Code of Practice on Well- Managed Highway Infrastructure and this publication provides advice to highway authorities on a number of issues, including inspections of the highway: This free document is available at the following link:

4_ appreciate that there were a number of previous incidents at this ford that the local highway authority was not made aware of, but am afraid cannot comment on the why this might have happened. While service agreements are often in place between forces and local authorities there are no existing requirements for this to take place. The sharing of information locally is a matter for local agencies. You may wish to consider bringing this matter to the attention of your Local Resilience Forum hope this response has explained my thinking on why do not believe there are any actions necessary from the Department. am afraid the concerns that you have raised are issues where the decision to act rests with the local authority, and there are tools available to them already to enable them to do SO_
Sent To
  • Department for Transport
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 12 Nov 2021
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 10/12/2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Heike MOJAY-SINCLARE aged 29. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 16 September 2021. The conclusion of the inquest was: I a Drowning I b I c
Copies Sent To
2. Derbyshire County Council 1. Derbyshire Fire and Rescue Service 2. Derbyshire Police
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Threshold for Ambulance Liaison Officer at events
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unclear Local Flood Response Roles
Action cards for emergency services in Major Incidents
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unclear Local Flood Response Roles
Mandatory Ambulance Liaison Officer at events
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unclear Local Flood Response Roles
Ensure prompt BTP Bronze Commander appointment
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unclear Local Flood Response Roles
Ambulance Liaison Officer resourcing
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unclear Local Flood Response Roles
Guidance on commander location during incidents
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unclear Local Flood Response Roles
BTP coordination with Home Office police services
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unclear Local Flood Response Roles
Define BTP Senior Duty Officer role in Major Incidents
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unclear Local Flood Response Roles
Review BTP jurisdiction overlaps
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unclear Local Flood Response Roles
Guidance on Silver command deployment to scene
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Unclear Local Flood Response Roles

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.