Maria Stancliffe-Cook
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2021-0235
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Mental Health related deaths
Suicide (from 2015)
All 2 responses received
· Deadline: 3 Sep 2021
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A patient's suicide risk was inappropriately downgraded by staff unfamiliar with their history, despite ongoing concerns from the care coordinator and a recent suicide attempt.
View full coroner's concerns
The trust have themselves admitted the failures reflected in an independent report they commissioned after the death, that report said “we would not expect a patients level of risk to be downgraded from high … to medium immediately following a suicide attempt”; In addition I heard evidence in relation to the assessment on the 26th July 2019 when the risk was downgraded from high to medium.
I listened very carefully to the steps that the Trust has taken to make changes following this death and I am pleased that a number of changes have taken place. I raised my concern about the downgrading of risk from high to medium in this case by two members of the team that had no previous dealings with Maria.
Maria was well known to the trust and her own care coordinator said “We were concerned about the ongoing risk of completed suicide given she continued to be in possession of a helium bottle, the risk was not considered to have changed since my first meeting with her when the risk to self was recorded as high”. That was a reference to a multidisciplinary meeting which took place a matter of weeks before her death.
I was told that risk is dynamic and that professionals assess risk at the time and that it can go up and down. I was also told that there are lots of assessments by staff that do not know patients. That said there is a concern that there is a risk of future death - is it right that the risk of a patient, who is well known to the trust, with a care coordinator who knew her well, is downgraded without any check put in place.
I listened very carefully to the steps that the Trust has taken to make changes following this death and I am pleased that a number of changes have taken place. I raised my concern about the downgrading of risk from high to medium in this case by two members of the team that had no previous dealings with Maria.
Maria was well known to the trust and her own care coordinator said “We were concerned about the ongoing risk of completed suicide given she continued to be in possession of a helium bottle, the risk was not considered to have changed since my first meeting with her when the risk to self was recorded as high”. That was a reference to a multidisciplinary meeting which took place a matter of weeks before her death.
I was told that risk is dynamic and that professionals assess risk at the time and that it can go up and down. I was also told that there are lots of assessments by staff that do not know patients. That said there is a concern that there is a risk of future death - is it right that the risk of a patient, who is well known to the trust, with a care coordinator who knew her well, is downgraded without any check put in place.
Responses
Action Taken
The Trust has implemented changes to improve understanding and application of risk assessment, including presentations from the Specialist Autism Team, an audit of the Triangle of Care, and an e-learning package on good practice when dealing with families and carers (due end of October 2021). (AI summary)
The Trust has implemented changes to improve understanding and application of risk assessment, including presentations from the Specialist Autism Team, an audit of the Triangle of Care, and an e-learning package on good practice when dealing with families and carers (due end of October 2021). (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Voisin, Thank you for your Regulation 28 report dated 8 July 2021, issued following the Inquest into the tragic death of Maria Stancliffe-Cook who died on 1 August 2019. We are very sorry that Maria lost her life and we have accepted the findings of the independent report that we commissioned from Niche. We know that you will share a copy of this response with Maria’s family and would like to express again our sincere condolences for their loss. At the conclusion of the inquest held on 5 July 2021 you shared your concerns with regard to the downgrading of risk status by practitioners who had ‘no previous dealings with Maria’. We acknowledge your concerns alongside the recommendations made within the Niche report. Please be assured, we have completed a full multi-professional review to consider how we can ensure that our staff can continue to work in an autonomous manner whilst maintaining the safe care of patients as indicated within your Regulation 28 report. The implementation of learning from this is our absolute priority. We have approximately 3000 service users within our Bristol services across three local geographic areas and a number of speciality work-streams. We have carefully considered the proportionality of risk in changing policy, balanced with the quality improvement process directly related to risk assessment and management. Whilst our staff work within teams, individual practitioners undertake the majority of patient engagement, assessment, formulation and review. All registered practitioners are held to account by their professional body as well as the Trust policy, procedures, values and expectations. We have supervision, appraisal and audit systems in place to ensure the competence and capability of our staff. However, we are continuously using experiences and feedback as a means to learn and improve our standards of care and practice. We have updated and continue to work with the action plan shared during the inquest. We will continue to support staff, patients and carers to ensure that all systems, policy, procedures and guidelines are consistently and robustly implemented in practice. M E Voisin HM Senior Coroner (Avon) The Coroner's Court Old Weston Road Flax Bourton BS48 1UL
2
We will achieve this through; audit, governance and assurance across all levels of the Trust. We do not believe that a change of policy would support the quality improvement work that has commenced and is already being introduced into practice. Instead, the Trust is continuing to support the delivery of these commitments with the actions detailed below, to improve the understanding and application of risk assessment and ensure that practitioners are able to demonstrate a clear and informed decision making process whenever risk is assessed. Risk Assessments The Trust has in place a regular monthly audit of sample records for risk and care management of patients in the community and in-patient services. The most recent audit data has shown 90% compliance with Trust standards and performance indicators. A ‘care planning steering group’ is in place, which is working with (and is co-produced alongside) those with lived experience to ensure quality improvements and compliance indicators are developed to support staff in practice. A new care plan and risk supervision tool has been introduced as a means to support staff to audit their patient records through management supervision each month. The tool is more comprehensive than the Trust sample audit and is specific to risk assessment, management, crisis and contingency, formulation of care and how individual practitioners are meeting the standards as indicated within the tool. The tool was developed as a quality improvement measure. It is completed through the supervision structure, which allows any areas of concern with record management or care delivery to be addressed with immediacy and plans introduced for performance support if this is indicated. The tool also identifies; patient, carer and family involvement to ensure that collaborative care is being provided or clearly identified if it is not indicated. The new tool has received positive feedback from staff using it, as it provides a framework of protected time to consider the safe aspects of patient care. A ‘task and finish group’ has also been formed to specifically develop a new face-to-face training package to address risk assessment and management including suicidality, self-injurious and complex behaviours. Again, this is a co-produced delivery group and to the training is expected to commence in the next couple of months. A report published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists in July 2020 on Self-Harm and Suicide in Adults, provides a comprehensive overview of the evidence base for suicide prevention measures and the role of mental health services within the wider system. This report highlights the increasing awareness of the limitations of risk assessment with regard to suicide risk and notes that ‘use of terms such as ‘low risk or ‘high risk’ are unreliable, open to misinterpretation and potentially unsafe (Cole-King and Platt, 2016)’. The report also highlights some best practice, including the importance of Safety Plans that are co- produced with the patient. One of the report authors is Dr , who is a Consultant Psychiatrist, Suicide Prevention expert and Director of ‘4Mental Health’, a reputable training provider.
3
Dr is a strong advocate of using Safety Plans for all service users and not just those seen as ‘High Risk’. Earlier this year, the Trust procured the services of ‘4Mental Health’ to provide AWP staff with a training package to be delivered in September and October 2021. The training package is 3.5 days and will initially be delivered to 60 members of staff. This is anticipated to promote consistency and benchmark standards of competency, linking the research of Dr . It specifically includes the co- production of Safety Plans. This training was identified to provide support to address the quality of risk assessments and care plans. These are areas of practice which have been recognised as thematic learning from investigations. Update on Niche Recommendations You have kindly acknowledged that we have taken some positive steps to make changes. The independent investigation conducted by Niche made five recommendations and also noted areas of good practice where trust staff made efforts to obtain information from partner agencies and to share information to develop a greater understanding of risk. We have provided further updates on the five recommendations from the independent report below, but also attach a copy of the current action plan: Recommendation 1 (staff access and consistency of care plans, risk assessments) We have detailed the changes being implemented in respect of care plans and risk assessments above and therefore will not repeat this information here. Recommendation 2 (capacity assessments) We have started detailed work to review and audit the quality of capacity assessments. There has been wide communication (including, but not limited to the Trust’s intranet) giving staff advice on how to complete capacity assessments. We intend to review how effective this is and continue to make further improvements. Recommendation 3 (research into suicide prevention) Suicide prevention remains a key area of development and concern. We are particularly focussing on developing guidance for staff regarding autism, risk assessment and suicide prevention. These will form part of a Clinical Toolkit and RiO Clinical Support. Our Library Services have started sending out literature on suicide prevention so that staff are up to date with the latest research and thinking on suicide prevention. There is a quarterly Suicide Prevention Workshop held for Bristol services that hosts guest speakers, reviews identified literature and explores challenges in practice through break-out groups. The next workshop is in November 2021 and is hosting the Specialist Autism Team who are providing a presentation for staff on how to support individuals experiencing complex and/or suicide risk. Recommendation 4 (applying Triangle of Care principles) Since Maria’s death, we have ensured that there is a named carer lead in each team. We are currently undertaking an audit of the Triangle of Care to ensure that identification of carers has been correctly
4
recorded. This will help us to ensure that carers’ views and knowledge are sought throughout the assessment and treatment process and that the carer is regularly updated and involved in care plans, medication management and strategies. The information from these audits will inform improvement plans which will be managed through local quality improvement. We are assessed externally for the Triangle of Care accreditation and will make our submission in autumn 2021. In addition to this, an e-learning package emphasising good practice when dealing with families and carers, is due to be released at the end of October 2021, with the aim to reach all staff. A team level, carer lead, training package is being developed with our expert by experience carer group which we hope to pilot in the autumn. Specific training sessions are delivered by the Carer Involvement Co- ordinator and Lead Psychologist for In-patients for Bristol services and has been received well by teams and carer involvees. Recommendation 5 (communication with families) The Trust will be recruiting 1.5 WTE Family Liaison Officers, in line with best practice, to ensure that family engagement is ongoing and delivered with the right resource. We attach the updated action plan for your information and would be happy to send you an updated version six months from today, after completion and quality control if you would like. Please be assured that learning from the circumstances of this tragic death will also be shared more widely with colleagues.
2
We will achieve this through; audit, governance and assurance across all levels of the Trust. We do not believe that a change of policy would support the quality improvement work that has commenced and is already being introduced into practice. Instead, the Trust is continuing to support the delivery of these commitments with the actions detailed below, to improve the understanding and application of risk assessment and ensure that practitioners are able to demonstrate a clear and informed decision making process whenever risk is assessed. Risk Assessments The Trust has in place a regular monthly audit of sample records for risk and care management of patients in the community and in-patient services. The most recent audit data has shown 90% compliance with Trust standards and performance indicators. A ‘care planning steering group’ is in place, which is working with (and is co-produced alongside) those with lived experience to ensure quality improvements and compliance indicators are developed to support staff in practice. A new care plan and risk supervision tool has been introduced as a means to support staff to audit their patient records through management supervision each month. The tool is more comprehensive than the Trust sample audit and is specific to risk assessment, management, crisis and contingency, formulation of care and how individual practitioners are meeting the standards as indicated within the tool. The tool was developed as a quality improvement measure. It is completed through the supervision structure, which allows any areas of concern with record management or care delivery to be addressed with immediacy and plans introduced for performance support if this is indicated. The tool also identifies; patient, carer and family involvement to ensure that collaborative care is being provided or clearly identified if it is not indicated. The new tool has received positive feedback from staff using it, as it provides a framework of protected time to consider the safe aspects of patient care. A ‘task and finish group’ has also been formed to specifically develop a new face-to-face training package to address risk assessment and management including suicidality, self-injurious and complex behaviours. Again, this is a co-produced delivery group and to the training is expected to commence in the next couple of months. A report published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists in July 2020 on Self-Harm and Suicide in Adults, provides a comprehensive overview of the evidence base for suicide prevention measures and the role of mental health services within the wider system. This report highlights the increasing awareness of the limitations of risk assessment with regard to suicide risk and notes that ‘use of terms such as ‘low risk or ‘high risk’ are unreliable, open to misinterpretation and potentially unsafe (Cole-King and Platt, 2016)’. The report also highlights some best practice, including the importance of Safety Plans that are co- produced with the patient. One of the report authors is Dr , who is a Consultant Psychiatrist, Suicide Prevention expert and Director of ‘4Mental Health’, a reputable training provider.
3
Dr is a strong advocate of using Safety Plans for all service users and not just those seen as ‘High Risk’. Earlier this year, the Trust procured the services of ‘4Mental Health’ to provide AWP staff with a training package to be delivered in September and October 2021. The training package is 3.5 days and will initially be delivered to 60 members of staff. This is anticipated to promote consistency and benchmark standards of competency, linking the research of Dr . It specifically includes the co- production of Safety Plans. This training was identified to provide support to address the quality of risk assessments and care plans. These are areas of practice which have been recognised as thematic learning from investigations. Update on Niche Recommendations You have kindly acknowledged that we have taken some positive steps to make changes. The independent investigation conducted by Niche made five recommendations and also noted areas of good practice where trust staff made efforts to obtain information from partner agencies and to share information to develop a greater understanding of risk. We have provided further updates on the five recommendations from the independent report below, but also attach a copy of the current action plan: Recommendation 1 (staff access and consistency of care plans, risk assessments) We have detailed the changes being implemented in respect of care plans and risk assessments above and therefore will not repeat this information here. Recommendation 2 (capacity assessments) We have started detailed work to review and audit the quality of capacity assessments. There has been wide communication (including, but not limited to the Trust’s intranet) giving staff advice on how to complete capacity assessments. We intend to review how effective this is and continue to make further improvements. Recommendation 3 (research into suicide prevention) Suicide prevention remains a key area of development and concern. We are particularly focussing on developing guidance for staff regarding autism, risk assessment and suicide prevention. These will form part of a Clinical Toolkit and RiO Clinical Support. Our Library Services have started sending out literature on suicide prevention so that staff are up to date with the latest research and thinking on suicide prevention. There is a quarterly Suicide Prevention Workshop held for Bristol services that hosts guest speakers, reviews identified literature and explores challenges in practice through break-out groups. The next workshop is in November 2021 and is hosting the Specialist Autism Team who are providing a presentation for staff on how to support individuals experiencing complex and/or suicide risk. Recommendation 4 (applying Triangle of Care principles) Since Maria’s death, we have ensured that there is a named carer lead in each team. We are currently undertaking an audit of the Triangle of Care to ensure that identification of carers has been correctly
4
recorded. This will help us to ensure that carers’ views and knowledge are sought throughout the assessment and treatment process and that the carer is regularly updated and involved in care plans, medication management and strategies. The information from these audits will inform improvement plans which will be managed through local quality improvement. We are assessed externally for the Triangle of Care accreditation and will make our submission in autumn 2021. In addition to this, an e-learning package emphasising good practice when dealing with families and carers, is due to be released at the end of October 2021, with the aim to reach all staff. A team level, carer lead, training package is being developed with our expert by experience carer group which we hope to pilot in the autumn. Specific training sessions are delivered by the Carer Involvement Co- ordinator and Lead Psychologist for In-patients for Bristol services and has been received well by teams and carer involvees. Recommendation 5 (communication with families) The Trust will be recruiting 1.5 WTE Family Liaison Officers, in line with best practice, to ensure that family engagement is ongoing and delivered with the right resource. We attach the updated action plan for your information and would be happy to send you an updated version six months from today, after completion and quality control if you would like. Please be assured that learning from the circumstances of this tragic death will also be shared more widely with colleagues.
Action Taken
DHSC highlights that the NHS has amended the post-discharge 7-day follow-up standard to 72 hours following discharge from inpatient mental health care, and the government is investing an additional £57 million in suicide prevention by 2023/24. (AI summary)
DHSC highlights that the NHS has amended the post-discharge 7-day follow-up standard to 72 hours following discharge from inpatient mental health care, and the government is investing an additional £57 million in suicide prevention by 2023/24. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Voisin,
Thank you for your letter of 8 July 2021 about the death of Maria Stancliffe-Cook. I am replying as Minister with responsibility for mental health, and I am grateful for the additional time allowed in order for me to do so.
Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Ms Stancliffe-Cook’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are very concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention.
In relation to the matters of concern raised within your report, as you are aware the Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust commissioned an independent investigation into Ms Stancliffe-Cook's death, the findings of which have been shared with you. I am advised that the Trust has also completed a multi- professional review to consider how staff can continue to work in an autonomous manner whilst maintaining the safe care of patients, and that the Trust has implemented several changes, as a result of these investigatory activities, to improve the understanding and application of risk assessment across the Trust. I am further advised that the Care Quality Commission, the independent regulator for quality, will seek assurance that these actions are undertaken by the Trust. It is of course vital that the Trust takes forward the learnings from Ms Stancliffe-Cook's death.
With regards to the assessment of mental health patients, evidence from the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health (NCISH)1, as well as National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance2, suggests that risk assessments must not be seen as a form of risk prediction. It is emphasised that whilst standardised tools may provide the impression of precision, they are poor
1 https://sites.manchester.ac.uk/ncish/reports/the-assessment-of-clinical-risk-in-mental-health- services/ 2 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance
in terms of prediction of suicide or a particular behaviour. Instead evidence suggests that assessments should be personalised according to individual circumstances.
At a national level, the Government remains committed to ensuring that fewer people die by suicide each year. Indeed, every suicide is a tragedy that can have a deep impact on families, friends, and communities, and even a single suicide is a suicide too many.
The Department continues to work across Government and with health services and suicide prevention stakeholders, including people with lived experience and those bereaved by suicide, to put in place a scheme of work to prevent future suicides.
In March 2021, the Department published Preventing suicide in England: Fifth progress report of the cross-government outcomes strategy to save lives3, which details work across Government and with health service and suicide prevention stakeholders, to reduce suicide rates. It includes action to reduce access to the means to complete suicide. As a result, a process has been established with partners, and across Government, to rapidly signpost emerging methods and take actions through a multi-agency approach. This includes, but is not limited to, limiting access to the method, and reducing or removing material that promotes suicide methods.
Evidence from NCISH has shown that people in contact with mental health services are at highest risk of suicide in the immediate days and months following discharge (200-fold increased risk in the three months post discharge). In view of this, NHS England and NHS Improvement have amended the national post-discharge 7-day follow up standard in the NHS standard contract, to instead require all patients to be followed up within 72 hours following discharge from inpatient mental health care.
Through the NHS Long Term Plan, the Government is investing an additional £57million in suicide prevention by 2023/24. This will see investment in all areas of the country to support local suicide prevention plans and the development of suicide bereavement services.
More broadly, we are increasing investment in mental health services and expanding support for people in crisis. The Government remains committed to the aims of the NHS Long Term Plan to invest at least an additional £2.3billion a year into mental health services by 2023/24. In response to the pandemic, all NHS mental health providers acted quickly to establish 24/7 urgent mental health helplines for people experiencing a mental health crisis. This is an ambition of the NHS Long Term Plan brought forward from 2023/24 to now.
I hope this response is helpful.
GILLIAN KEEGAN
3https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97 3935/fifth-suicide-prevention-strategy-progress-report.pdf
Thank you for your letter of 8 July 2021 about the death of Maria Stancliffe-Cook. I am replying as Minister with responsibility for mental health, and I am grateful for the additional time allowed in order for me to do so.
Firstly, I would like to say how saddened I was to read of the circumstances of Ms Stancliffe-Cook’s death and I offer my sincere condolences to her family and loved ones. The circumstances your report describes are very concerning and I am grateful to you for bringing these matters to my attention.
In relation to the matters of concern raised within your report, as you are aware the Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust commissioned an independent investigation into Ms Stancliffe-Cook's death, the findings of which have been shared with you. I am advised that the Trust has also completed a multi- professional review to consider how staff can continue to work in an autonomous manner whilst maintaining the safe care of patients, and that the Trust has implemented several changes, as a result of these investigatory activities, to improve the understanding and application of risk assessment across the Trust. I am further advised that the Care Quality Commission, the independent regulator for quality, will seek assurance that these actions are undertaken by the Trust. It is of course vital that the Trust takes forward the learnings from Ms Stancliffe-Cook's death.
With regards to the assessment of mental health patients, evidence from the National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Safety in Mental Health (NCISH)1, as well as National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance2, suggests that risk assessments must not be seen as a form of risk prediction. It is emphasised that whilst standardised tools may provide the impression of precision, they are poor
1 https://sites.manchester.ac.uk/ncish/reports/the-assessment-of-clinical-risk-in-mental-health- services/ 2 https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance
in terms of prediction of suicide or a particular behaviour. Instead evidence suggests that assessments should be personalised according to individual circumstances.
At a national level, the Government remains committed to ensuring that fewer people die by suicide each year. Indeed, every suicide is a tragedy that can have a deep impact on families, friends, and communities, and even a single suicide is a suicide too many.
The Department continues to work across Government and with health services and suicide prevention stakeholders, including people with lived experience and those bereaved by suicide, to put in place a scheme of work to prevent future suicides.
In March 2021, the Department published Preventing suicide in England: Fifth progress report of the cross-government outcomes strategy to save lives3, which details work across Government and with health service and suicide prevention stakeholders, to reduce suicide rates. It includes action to reduce access to the means to complete suicide. As a result, a process has been established with partners, and across Government, to rapidly signpost emerging methods and take actions through a multi-agency approach. This includes, but is not limited to, limiting access to the method, and reducing or removing material that promotes suicide methods.
Evidence from NCISH has shown that people in contact with mental health services are at highest risk of suicide in the immediate days and months following discharge (200-fold increased risk in the three months post discharge). In view of this, NHS England and NHS Improvement have amended the national post-discharge 7-day follow up standard in the NHS standard contract, to instead require all patients to be followed up within 72 hours following discharge from inpatient mental health care.
Through the NHS Long Term Plan, the Government is investing an additional £57million in suicide prevention by 2023/24. This will see investment in all areas of the country to support local suicide prevention plans and the development of suicide bereavement services.
More broadly, we are increasing investment in mental health services and expanding support for people in crisis. The Government remains committed to the aims of the NHS Long Term Plan to invest at least an additional £2.3billion a year into mental health services by 2023/24. In response to the pandemic, all NHS mental health providers acted quickly to establish 24/7 urgent mental health helplines for people experiencing a mental health crisis. This is an ambition of the NHS Long Term Plan brought forward from 2023/24 to now.
I hope this response is helpful.
GILLIAN KEEGAN
3https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/97 3935/fifth-suicide-prevention-strategy-progress-report.pdf
Sent To
- Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust
- Department of Health and Social Care
Response Status
Linked responses
2 of 2
56-Day Deadline
3 Sep 2021
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 21/08/2019 I commenced an investigation into the death of Maria STANCLIFFE-COOK. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest.
Box 3 of the record of inquest recorded the following: “Maria Stancliffe-Cook died on 1st August 2019 at Highbury Villas, Cotham, Bristol. She had intentionally taken her own life with the use of helium causing asphyxiation. She had been assessed by the mental health team on 26th July 2019 and her risk had been downgraded from high to medium. She had a telephone call on 28th July 2019 which did not meet the standard; there was no assessment or plan to manage her risk undertaken at this time.”
The conclusion was: suicide contributed to by neglect.
Box 3 of the record of inquest recorded the following: “Maria Stancliffe-Cook died on 1st August 2019 at Highbury Villas, Cotham, Bristol. She had intentionally taken her own life with the use of helium causing asphyxiation. She had been assessed by the mental health team on 26th July 2019 and her risk had been downgraded from high to medium. She had a telephone call on 28th July 2019 which did not meet the standard; there was no assessment or plan to manage her risk undertaken at this time.”
The conclusion was: suicide contributed to by neglect.
Circumstances of the Death
Maria had a history of poor mental health over many years which resulted in a referral to the mental health team in January 2018.
On 18th December 2018 Maria was admitted to A&E at Bristol Royal Infirmary having tried to end her life by using helium, and was referred to crisis team who later discharged her back to the care of her GP.
On 23rd January 2019 her GP said that Maria told her that she’d ordered another helium kit, she denied any thoughts and was referred to the mental health team.
From then until the events in July there are various appointments with the mental health team, her GP and her therapist.
On 12th June 2019 there was a meeting with a number of those caring for Maria the notes say
Website www.avon-coroner.com “ we expressed our worry with Maria that with the method which she had considered in the past her ongoing social isolation and the sense that it is unlikely she would ask for help from others she would be a high risk of completed suicide if she attempted again. Her lack of protective factors beyond her investment in her studies was also discussed “
Her care coordinator , was present and she said in her evidence that was read, “We were concerned about the ongoing risk of completed suicide given she continued to be in possession of a helium bottle, the risk was not considered to have changed since my first meeting with her when the risk to self was recorded as high”.
By 26th July 2019 things significantly changed. She reported to her therapist and GP both who knew her well that she was having active suicidal thoughts. She had told them both that she’d tried to use the helium cylinder but it failed so ordered another one; she also said that she’d been researching high buildings. Her therapist was extremely concerned and said that that this felt like she had a high intention to complete suicide. He reported this to the mental health team.
Her GP said that this was a big change; Maria told her that her suicidal thoughts had got worse and they were difficult to dismiss. Her GP referred her to the mental health team explaining her concerns.
Maria was seen that evening by two members of the mental health team neither of whom had met her before. They assessed her and decided to downgrade her risk from high to medium.
On 28th July 2019 as planned one of the them telephoned Maria, this was Maria’s last contact with anyone from the mental health team the call and the note making lasted around 3 minutes, she said that Maria told her she was ok.
Sadly on 1st August 2019 – Maria was found dead by police after flat mates became concerned for her. That week she was also supposed to have an appointment with a care coordinator but that had not been arranged.
On 18th December 2018 Maria was admitted to A&E at Bristol Royal Infirmary having tried to end her life by using helium, and was referred to crisis team who later discharged her back to the care of her GP.
On 23rd January 2019 her GP said that Maria told her that she’d ordered another helium kit, she denied any thoughts and was referred to the mental health team.
From then until the events in July there are various appointments with the mental health team, her GP and her therapist.
On 12th June 2019 there was a meeting with a number of those caring for Maria the notes say
Website www.avon-coroner.com “ we expressed our worry with Maria that with the method which she had considered in the past her ongoing social isolation and the sense that it is unlikely she would ask for help from others she would be a high risk of completed suicide if she attempted again. Her lack of protective factors beyond her investment in her studies was also discussed “
Her care coordinator , was present and she said in her evidence that was read, “We were concerned about the ongoing risk of completed suicide given she continued to be in possession of a helium bottle, the risk was not considered to have changed since my first meeting with her when the risk to self was recorded as high”.
By 26th July 2019 things significantly changed. She reported to her therapist and GP both who knew her well that she was having active suicidal thoughts. She had told them both that she’d tried to use the helium cylinder but it failed so ordered another one; she also said that she’d been researching high buildings. Her therapist was extremely concerned and said that that this felt like she had a high intention to complete suicide. He reported this to the mental health team.
Her GP said that this was a big change; Maria told her that her suicidal thoughts had got worse and they were difficult to dismiss. Her GP referred her to the mental health team explaining her concerns.
Maria was seen that evening by two members of the mental health team neither of whom had met her before. They assessed her and decided to downgrade her risk from high to medium.
On 28th July 2019 as planned one of the them telephoned Maria, this was Maria’s last contact with anyone from the mental health team the call and the note making lasted around 3 minutes, she said that Maria told her she was ok.
Sadly on 1st August 2019 – Maria was found dead by police after flat mates became concerned for her. That week she was also supposed to have an appointment with a care coordinator but that had not been arranged.
Action Should Be Taken
Website www.avon-coroner.com
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.