Joan Prescott

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2021-0223
Date of Report 30 June 2021
Coroner Ian Arrow
Response Deadline est. 25 August 2021
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Safeguarding considerations, particularly regarding a known poor property condition, were not adequately recorded or prioritised during a welfare visit. This represented a missed opportunity to formally address broader safeguarding concerns.
View full coroner's concerns
_ [BRIEF SUMMARY OF MATTERS OF CONCERN] Safeguarding Consideration at the time of the visit There was no reference in the recordings to a discussion on safeguarding being considered. Again, on interviewing the social workers they felt there was a need for GP involvement and for an admission, not safeguarding at that stage (missed opportunity). The social workers formed an opinion that the initial focus was not on the state of the property, which was a known situation, but on the immediate presenting potential physical and mental health needs, hence their plan to recommend to re-contact GP for involvement: There is a clear recording of this reflection and decision in notes following visit. Following_the welfare visit the GP was made aware (24/04/2020) of findings via the Duty Worker_ May
Sent To
  • Devon County Council
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 25 Aug 2021
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
Joan Mary PRESCOTT Following an Inquest opened on the 22 2020 and an inquest hearing at HM Coroner's Court; Plymouth on the 25 June 2021 heard before lan Michael Arrow, in the coroner's area for Plymouth, Torbay and South Devon.
Circumstances of the Death
The deceased lived alone. On the balance of probability, she was not compliant with her medication: On the balance of probability she neglected herself. She deteriorated. She was conveyed to hospital where she sadly died on 9th May 2020
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action: Please review the action advised by
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Require consultant or paediatrician permission for discharging children with protection concerns.
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning Missed Child Safeguarding Referrals
Require documented future care plan for discharging children with protection concerns.
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning Missed Child Safeguarding Referrals
Ensure identified GP for children with deliberate harm concerns discharged from hospital.
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning Missed Child Safeguarding Referrals
Single agency for high-risk children
Southport Inquiry
Missed Child Safeguarding Referrals
Significance of multiple referrals
Southport Inquiry
Missed Child Safeguarding Referrals
Addressing parental consent manipulation
Southport Inquiry
Missed Child Safeguarding Referrals
Taxi company and school safeguarding arrangements
Southport Inquiry
Missed Child Safeguarding Referrals
Agencies to respect school insight on risk
Southport Inquiry
Missed Child Safeguarding Referrals
KCSIE 2026 safeguarding information transfer
Southport Inquiry
Missed Child Safeguarding Referrals
Audit of safeguarding information transfer between schools
Southport Inquiry
Missed Child Safeguarding Referrals

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.