Elizabeth Pamment

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2021-0006
Date of Report 8 January 2021
Coroner ME Hassell
Response Deadline est. 5 March 2021
All 1 response received · Deadline: 5 Mar 2021
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A care home failed to record and follow explicit instructions to contact a daughter during an emergency, leading to the resident being left unaided for hours after a fall.
View full coroner's concerns
When Elizabeth Pamment moved in to Alleyn House in 2016, she and her family gave explicit instructions that, in the event of any emergency, her daughter living very nearby was to be contacted. This was discussed in some detail and agreed to by Peabody staff.

Mrs Pamment wore a pendant to enable her to summon assistance in the event of a fall or other emergency. She used this for the first time on the evening of 12 August 2020. Staff from Islington Telecare attended and helped her back to bed. However, they were unaware of the standing instruction to call her daughter and so did not do this.

The consequence of this was that, when Mrs Pamment fell again the same night and was unable to get up or call for help, she had to spend the night alone on the floor getting more and more unwell.

Peabody staff explained the following in evidence.

1. There was no record made by Peabody of the instruction given by Mrs Pamment and her family.

2. There was no Peabody protocol for the taking and recording such an instruction.

3. The Peabody scheme manager checked personal details with tenants from time to time, but was never advised to obtain such an instruction regarding when to call a family member.

4. Peabody gave tenants’ personal details to Islington Telecare, but kept no record of what information they had passed on to the alarm monitoring company. Witnesses in court had no idea what Islington Telecare had been told to do in the event of an emergency with Mrs Pamment.

5. Despite Mrs Pamment’s death occurring in August 2020, it was not until today at inquest that Peabody staff considered making any changes to their procedures.

If Islington Telecare had been instructed always to contact Mrs Pamment’s daughter in the event of an emergency, would have been rung as soon as the team had been sent out to Elizabeth Pamment, and in fact would have arrived before them. She would then have stayed and looked after her mum. It is unclear whether that would have saved Mrs Pamment’s life but it is possible, and it certainly would have significantly improved her physical and emotional comfort.
Responses
Peabody Charity / Third Sector
8 Jan 2021
Action Taken
Peabody updated its resident information form and action plan and has met with Islington's Safeguarding Lead to discuss the case. Peabody is implementing a new process providing senior management oversight for staff involvement in future inquests. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Madam EP INQUEST REGULATION 28 REPORT RESPONSE Thank You for your letter of 8 January 2021. We are grateful to you for bringing your concerns to our attention following_the inquest_hearing of Mrs Elizabeth Pamment at which Peabody were a Interested Person: the Older People's Housing Support Manager and IScheme Manager attended the inquest to provide evidence on behalf of Peabody: Background to Peabodys service at Alleyn House Alleyn House is a sheltered housing scheme in Islington which is part of Peabody' $ Whitecross Street Estate and is home to 31 residents: Peabody own and manage 34 sheltered housing schemes in London: These provide 992 units of accommodation for tenants who are over 55. The sheltered housing scheme provides for independent living: Each tenant has a self-contained flat with their own front door and they are free to come and go as please. Peabody provides a 'Scheme Manager' who is there during office hours to respond to emergencies, deal with resident queries, to prevent social isolation by organising events and activities and to provide an enhanced housing management service by assisting with organising repairs and general building management; Peabody does not provide care, but housing related support via the Scheme Manager (who is on site 35 hours a week 9am to Spm Monday to Friday): The people residing at the service (the residents) are generally independent and have full capacity: For the avoidance of any doubt, there is no care support service on site unless tenants make their own arrangements directly with a care provider. As Peabody do not provide care or any healthcare regulated activities at Alleyn House, this sheltered housing scheme is not a CQC regulated service_ We supply telecare to residents in the form of a 'Careline' . This provides the opportunity for residents to call for help in an emergency: The service can be accessed through alarm/response call points and intercoms which are positioned throughout the accommodation in both residents' flats and in communal areas. The system can also be accessed through wearable devices such as watches and pendants where requested by residents If an alarm is triggered, it goes to the staff on site during office and to the out of hours Careline provider out of hours: This out of hours Careline service is provided by the Local Authority: and they hours

45 Westminster Bridge Road Minicom 020 7021 4492 London SEI 7JB Peabody Direct 020.7021 4444 Tel 020 7021 4000 or 0800022 4040 Fax 0203 828 4203 peabody direct@peabodyorg.uk DX 99975 Lambeth 2 wwwpeabody orguk When the alarm is triggered the Scheme Manager during working hours or the Careline provider out of hours will decide whether the call requires a emergency response from them or from the emergency services_ Essential resident information (information such as name, address, contacts including next of medication, health issues, ethnicity) is collatedarnegraapreo thegervice by Peabody staff and transferred to the Careline provider: Peabody staff review custonere data quarterly or if there is a change in the tenants circumstances. The Scheme Careline provider if anything significant has changed. Manager updates the out of hours Careline provider for Alleyn House is Islington Telecare: are the only Careline Provider we work with who did not provide a standardised form to complete containing resident information; The custom and practice was to provide information about residents to Islington Telecare by email. This practice had not resulted in any previous concerns about emergency response provided by Islington Telecare Mrs Pamment Mrs Pamment resided at Alleyn House for over 4 years, from June 2016 to August 2020. The support agreement in place with Peabody was for Mrs Pamment to receive a call every morning when the Scheme Manager was on site. Mrs Pamment's daughter, provided support with shopping, and household tasks such as cleaning, and visited her mother most days except Fridays. Mrs Pamment was issued with a wrist pendant by Peabody in addition to the emergency cords in each room throughout the flat which enabled 24 hour emergency Mrs Pamment lived independently, she wore her care line pendant for emergencies but was also able to contact the Scheme Manager during office hours directly if she had any particular queries or concerns. Timeline of events leading Up to Mrs Pamment's death On the 12th August 2020 Mrs Pamment had a fall in the night and used her pendant to call Islington Telecare: Islington Telecare visited at around 22.48 and reported that they found Mrs Pamment on the floor. assisted her off the floor, helped her back into bed and left: Later that night or the following morning she fell again and was unable to call for assistance_ The next morning the Older People's Housing and Support Manager was providing cover for the Scheme Manager who was on leave_ is familiar with the service and the residents. As per our standard practice on arrival at the service] Icommenced call checks to each of the tenants. While carrying out these checks noted that a resident in another flat was unwell: She attended to this resident who required an ambulance_ waited with the resident until the ambulance arrived. Once the customer had been seen by the paramedics, carried on with her checks and contacted Mrs Pamment's flat at 10.30am: No answer was received from Mrs Pamment and ttherefore entered the flat and found Mrs Pamment on the floor and extremely unwell. immediately called for an ambulance and her daughter who lived nearby and was very involved in Mrs Pamment's support. Mrs Pamment was admitted to hospital and sadly passed away a few days later. Peabody key kin, The They pull help: They

45 Westminster Bridge Road Minicomn 020 7021 4492 Peabody London SEI 7JB Peabody Direct 020 7021 4444 Tel 020 7021 4000 or 0800022 4040 Fax 0203 .828 4203 peabody direct@peabodvorg uk DX 99975 Lambeth 2 WWW; peabodyorg uk Review undertaken bY Peabody Following the incident; as the Older People's Housing and Support Manager, reviewed actions required with her Head of Service: At that time no apparent failure to follow procedures nor concerns regarding the response to the incident were identified. The review focussed on the actions taken by the staff member when she arrived at work and the response when Mrs Pamment was found unwell in her flat. In terms of concerns raised by Mrs Pamment's family at the time; the family was in contact with after the event and questioned the actions of Islington Telecare. The family asked Isome questions about Islington Telecare's visit and had acted as an intermediary getting responses to those questions We were not contacted again by either Islington Telecare or the family on this matter and so were not aware f further issues or specific concerns in regards to Peabody' $ actions The question of whether an ambulance should have been called following Mrs Pamment's first fall became the focus of our reflection in preparing for the inquest: We were not alerted in advance to concerns about our procedures and consequently our witnesses attended without representation: Matters of Concern raised by the Coroner and Peabody's response
1. There was no record made by Peabody of the instruction given by Mrs P and her family: It is agreed that the instruction to call Mrs Pamment's daughter in the event of an incident was not noted on Mrs Pamment's case file SO we cannot confirm if this instruction was given by Mrs Pamment or her family. The staff member dealing with Mrs Pamment's admission unfortunately does not recall such an instruction due to the time passed since she moved in (over four years ago). Our sheltered housing residents have capacity and can exercise choice. Our practice and protocol is to ask residents if wish their next of kin to be contacted as and when an incident occurs. In situation where the resident was incapacitated the staff member would always contact the resident's next of kin/emergency contact and the emergency services where appropriate_ A resident's next of kin would also be contacted where we are unduly concerned about resident, using our best judgment_ In order to address the concern raised, we have amended how we share residents' information with Islington Telecare to ensure that any specific requests are captured with the resident's permission and noted to the Careline provider We have also included a section that explains to the resident that if Careline is alerted out of hoursand the call requires an emergency response then the careline provider will always contact their NOK unless the resident specifically opts out of that procedure: AIl essential and required information will now be captured in a standardised 'Resident Information Form' . We have appended this form to our response. Our service manager has made arrangements to meet all other careline providers we commission to review the other forms in use to see if could be improved. The outcome ofthose discussions will further inform our procedural review. any they they

45 Westminster Bridge Road Minicom 020 7021 4492 Peabody London SEI 7JB Peabody Direct 020 7021 4444 Tel 020 7021 4000 or 0800022 4040 Fax 0203 828 4203 peabody direct@p DX 99975 Lambeth2 peabodyorg uk WWW; 'peabodyorg uk There was no Peabody protocol for the taking and recording such an instruction: is Peabody's protocol to record essential information about the resident within our case management system: All residents are assessed as part of the moving in process and there ts coditiaous process ofreview throughout their tenure Information captured includes relevanthistorya additional needs, next of kin details and other essential information such as medical information: Not all information held about the resident is appropriate to share with the Careline provider and therefore essential information; until this case, Was either exchanged by form or by emailin ther case of Islington Telecare. As per the previous action above we will now always use a comprehensive form to exchange information with Careline providers and this will include special instructions from essential resident_ 3 The Peabody scheme manager checked personal details with tenants from time to time, but was never advised to obtain such an instruction regarding when to call @ family member Peabodv s procedure requires our staff to review all residents personal details on a quarterly basis orasand when the residents circumstances change. Significant changes are shared with the Careline provider accordingly: This activity is reviewed by the Managers as part of their quarterly scheme checks This procedure was explained during the inquest As set out above, residents will now be informed that Careline will always contact NOK in an emergency unless they opt out of that instruction. Further to that they will be explicitly asked whether there are other special instructions want shared with the Careline provider. We have produced Resident Information Form to capture all required information_ Peabody gave tenants' personal details to Islington Telecare, but kept no record of what information they had passed on to the alarm monitoring company: Witnesses in court had no idea what Islington Telecare had been told to do in the event of an emergency with Mrs P We did not have this information available for the inquest a5 we were previously asked only to provide a statement on Mrs Pamment's accommodation and on the events of the Mrs Pamment was found unwell: Staff were not informed prior to the inquest that this information would be required and no requests for further information were made to Us beforehand, other than to provide the witness statements as already noted. In sheltered housing we have a set of information that we hand over to all Careline providers We informed the inquest that this information would typically include name, address, age, key contacts including next of kin, medication, health issues and ethnicity: This information is usually requested on a standard template provided by the Careline providers_ At that time, Islington Telecare did not provide a template for this purpose. As confirmed above, we have now produced a standardised template form which will be completed for each resident and we are meeting with Islington on the 15th March to further discuss the revised form and procedure_ any the Area they day

45 Westminster Bridge Road Minicom 020 7021 4492 Peabody Lonaon SEI 7JB Peabody Direct 020 7021 4444 Tel 020 7021 4000 or 0800022 4040 Fax 0203 828 4203 peabodly directapeabody org uk DX 99975 Lambelh2 wwwpeabody orguk
5. Despite Mrs P's death occurring in August 2020, it was not until today at inquest that Peabody staff considered making any changes to their procedures: We were not aware of the concerns raised by the family until our attendance at the inquest and our own review had not identified any specific procedural or staff failings. Previous incidents had also not highlighted gaps in our practice. We accept that our procedures will be improved by a more formalised exchange of information with Islington Telecare and by specifically giving residents the opportunity to have special instructions captured by uS and passed on to the out of hours service Actions associated with this improvement are either complete or set with an implementation date_ A meeting is due to take place on 15 March 2021 between in her role as Service Manager and her counter-part at Islington Telecare whereby the roll out of the Resident Information form is to be discussed so that the information on our residents provided to them is standardised. Forms for all residents of House are to be completed by 15 March and forms for residents of all other schemes serviced by Islington Telecare are to be completed by end of March 2021. Discussions with other careline providers regarding procedural changes are to take place by the end of April 2021_ Summary of Actions takenLto_be_taken by Peabody A standard Resident Information Form for Careline providers been produced (attached) which captures appropriate information including specific instructions regarding family/NOK contact in emergency and non-emergency situations_ A new procedure will be implemented that ensures that specific questions are asked of new tenants and existing tenants at review and fully shared with all Careline providers supporting Peabody residents. We will review all current resident information to ensure any special instructions/arrangements are logged and communicated to the relevant Careline provider: As part of wider work and part of a review of Careline service, we are installing safes for each flat within Peabody'$s Older Peoples' Social Housing services to assist with access for emergency services or appropriate persons: We attach a copy of our Action Plan following this inquest for your reference. We have also met with Islington's Safeguarding Lead to discuss this case and there have been communications between us and Islington Telecare since the inquest: As set out above, Peabody' $ Head of Service has meetings arranged with Islington Telecare and other telecare providers to review our learning from this matter, which are to take place by the end of April 2021. In terms of the inquest proceedings, it is also recognised that the witnesses from Peabody were not appropriately supported when responding to and attending the inquest: Therefore Peabody is also implementing new process whereby there is appropriate senior management oversight for involvement of Peabody s staff in any future inquests. Alleyn has key

45 Westminster Bridge Road Minicom 020 7021.4492 Peabody London SEI ZJB Peabody Direct 020 7021 4444 Tel 020 7021 4000 Or 0800022 4040 Fax 0203 828 4203 peabody direct@peabodyorg uk DX 99975 Lambelh 2 wwwpeabodyorg uk We are concerned that the Coroner was not able to raise her concerns with Peabody on an informal basis and request further information Peabody in the first instance to give us an opportunity to respond before a Regulation 28 report was considered; Peabody does however recognise the learning and the room for improvement in regards to its record keeping, the sharing of information regarding its residents to careline providers and communicating its expectations of careline providers We hope the above information provides the necessary assurance in regards to steps taken by Peabody resulting from this matter. Please do let me know if we can assist vou any further and we would Iike to again offer our sincere condolences to Mrs Pamment's family:
Sent To
  • Peabody Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 5 Mar 2021
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 20 August 2020, I commenced an investigation into the death of Elizabeth Pamment aged 81 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest earlier today. I made a determination at inquest, a copy of which I attach.
Circumstances of the Death
Elizabeth Pamment lived in Alleyn House, sheltered accommodation provided by Peabody Trust.

She died from pneumonia following two falls on the same night, the second of which resulted in her lying alone on the floor, increasingly unwell, until she was found mid morning by a Peabody area manager.
Copies Sent To
, chief executive, Islington Council Care Quality Commission for England
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

On-Call Consultant Display
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Staff rota communication
24/7 IPC cover
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Staff rota communication
Increase driver briefing frequency with safety as primary agenda item
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Staff rota communication

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.