Joseph Brindley
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2020-0294
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Multiple qualified staff failed to identify fractures on CT scans and X-rays, possibly due to a shortage of radiologists and inadequate review processes, raising concerns.
View full coroner's concerns
The inguest heard that the CT scan and the X-rays were said to have been May two point May examined carefully: However; the fractures were not identified. Availability of radiologists due to a shortage of qualified radiologists locally and nationally meant that radiographers as well as radiologists were involved in the reviews that did not identify the fractures_ The final review where the fractures were not picked up was said to have included careful comparison with the earlier X-ray: The Trust have made HMC aware of review processes which seek to enhance clinical skills and avoid errors. However; it is unclear what steps have been taken to tackle and avoid the specific concerns that arose in this case where 3 qualified members of staff did not recognise the injury:
Sent To
- Tameside General Hospital
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
5 Mar 2021
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 18th 2020 commenced an investigation into the death of Joseph Brindley: The investigation concluded on the 13*h November 2020 and the conclusion was one of Narrative: Died from the consequences of an intracranial bleed, exacerbated by anticoagulation: The medical cause of death was Ia Intracranial bleed on a background of anticoagulation, Il Ischaemic Heart Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypothyroidism CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH On 11th March 2020, Joseph Brindley was admitted to Tameside General Hospital following a fall. He had a significant pleural effusion He also had rib fractures, which were not identified on a CT scan or in X-rays; although they were visible in X-rays. He was subsequently discharged from Tameside General Hospital: He was breathless at home and returned to the Emergency Department on a number of occasions and there was a suspected pulmonary embolism identified on one occasion: That was excluded with a CT pulmonary angiogram although the rib fractures were identified at that On 16th 2020, he was found unresponsive downstairs at his home address. On admission to hospital, a CT scan identified a catastrophic bleed t0 the brain, exacerbated by anticoagulation: He died at Tameside General Hospital on 16th May 2020. CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern: In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you: The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows: The inguest heard that the CT scan and the X-rays were said to have been May two point May examined carefully: However; the fractures were not identified. Availability of radiologists due to a shortage of qualified radiologists locally and nationally meant that radiographers as well as radiologists were involved in the reviews that did not identify the fractures_ The final review where the fractures were not picked up was said to have included careful comparison with the earlier X-ray: The Trust have made HMC aware of review processes which seek to enhance clinical skills and avoid errors. However; it is unclear what steps have been taken to tackle and avoid the specific concerns that arose in this case where 3 qualified members of staff did not recognise the injury: ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action: YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report; namely by 14h February 2021_ 1, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action: Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namelyl daughter of the deceased, and Tameside General Hospital, Who mayind it useful or of interest am also under a to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response_ The Chief Coroner publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form: He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest: may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner: Signatu ot Allson Mutch; HM Senior Coroner 21/4212020 duty may You
Circumstances of the Death
On 11th March 2020, Joseph Brindley was admitted to Tameside General Hospital following a fall. He had a significant pleural effusion He also had rib fractures, which were not identified on a CT scan or in X-rays; although they were visible in X-rays. He was subsequently discharged from Tameside General Hospital: He was breathless at home and returned to the Emergency Department on a number of occasions and there was a suspected pulmonary embolism identified on one occasion: That was excluded with a CT pulmonary angiogram although the rib fractures were identified at that On 16th 2020, he was found unresponsive downstairs at his home address. On admission to hospital, a CT scan identified a catastrophic bleed t0 the brain, exacerbated by anticoagulation: He died at Tameside General Hospital on 16th May 2020.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action:
Inquest Conclusion
The inguest heard that the CT scan and the X-rays were said to have been May two point May examined carefully: However; the fractures were not identified. Availability of radiologists due to a shortage of qualified radiologists locally and nationally meant that radiographers as well as radiologists were involved in the reviews that did not identify the fractures_ The final review where the fractures were not picked up was said to have included careful comparison with the earlier X-ray: The Trust have made HMC aware of review processes which seek to enhance clinical skills and avoid errors. However; it is unclear what steps have been taken to tackle and avoid the specific concerns that arose in this case where 3 qualified members of staff did not recognise the injury: ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action: YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report within 56 days of the date of this report; namely by 14h February 2021_ 1, the coroner, may extend the period. Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action: Otherwise you must explain why no action is proposed. COPIES and PUBLICATION have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons namelyl daughter of the deceased, and Tameside General Hospital, Who mayind it useful or of interest am also under a to send the Chief Coroner a copy of your response_ The Chief Coroner publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form: He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find it useful or of interest: may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response by the Chief Coroner: Signatu ot Allson Mutch; HM Senior Coroner 21/4212020 duty may You
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.