Eleanor Sherman

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2020-0254
Date of Report 26 November 2020
Coroner Sean McGovern
Coroner Area Warwickshire
Response Deadline ✓ from report 21 January 2021
All 1 response received · Deadline: 21 Jan 2021
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
There were two misdiagnoses at Warwick Hospital despite the GP's instructions, compounded by systemic errors related to accessing electronic records.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) Two m1sd1agnoses at Warwick Hospital notwithstanding the GP spec1f1cally stating in writing that Mrs Sherman should be treated as a SAH unless a CT scan showed to the contrary (2) Systemic errors regarding the inab1l1ty of the GP team at Warwick Hospital to access the electronic record and the slowness of notes being scanned on to the system.
Responses
South Warwickshire NHS Foundation Trust NHS / Health Body
20 Jan 2021
Action Taken
The Trust convened a Working Group to review the case, completed outstanding actions from the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Investigation, and disseminated the revised Acute Headache Pathway Trust-wide. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr McGovern, SSea Regulation 28 report _ Mrs Eleanor Sherman DoB 12/04/1948 DoD 25/11/2020 Thank you for your Regulation 28 report dated 26th November 2020 relating to the inquest of Mrs Eleanor Sherman: was to read of your outstanding concerns at the conclusion of the inquest and hope that the following information will provide you with further reassurance Following receipt of your report; the Trust convened a Working Group to review and critically reappraise the care and decision-making related to Mrs Sherman. That Group included our Medical Director; Director of Nursing, Head of Governance, a number of consultant physicians from both the Emergency Department (ED) and the Acute Medical Unit (AMU) and senior clinical nursing staff within ED. The Group explored, and reflected upon , a number of points relating to Mrs Sherman's care including the adequacy of the actions arising from the Trust's Root Cause Analysis (RCA) Investigation that were outlined at the Inquest; An updated position on the actions listed in the Action Plan of the RCA Investigation can be found below but can confirm that the actions outstanding at the time of the inquest have all now been completed: In addition to these existing actions, the Working Group felt that there should be a Trust-wide_ rather than just EDI AMU, dissemination of the revised Acute Headache Pathway to ensure that the wider Trust clinical body was aware of it: To this end, the Pathway has also not only been disseminated via Acute Medical Admission's own intranet page; but also introduced via the Trust-wide Patient Safety Newsletter. It is now available for all staff to refer to on the Trust's intranet site_ Separately to reviewing organisational learning from this case the Trust's Medical Director has reviewed any previous clinical incidents that the consultant practitioner was involved in and has discussed his performance with his clinical director. The Medical Director has met with NHS Resolution, the General Medical Council's Employment Liaison Advisor and the practitioner, and agreed with the clinical director a plan for the consultant practitioner's development in the light of this incident: Chair_ Chief Executive: The Trust is committed to being environmentally friendly, therefore where possible we use 100% recycled paper: This paper has been made using no harmful chemicals in the manufacturing process: sorry has

Although our RCA Investigation of Mrs Sherman's care highlighted number of care management concerns which have now been addressed, am grateful that your Regulation 28 Report provided us with a further opportunity to consider and improve our care to patients with symptoms suggestive of subarachnoid haemorrhage. The latest position on all of the actions arising from both our RCA Investigation and the further review arising from your Regulation 28 Report can be found at the foot of this letter. hope that this provides you with the assurance that you require but if, having read this letter, you have outstanding concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me
Sent To
  • Warwick Hospital
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 21 Jan 2021
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 1st September 2020 I commenced an invest1gat1on into the death of Eleanor Emily SHERMAN 72 years old The invest1gat1on concluded at the end of the inquest on 25 November 2020 The conclusion of the inquest was a Narrative Verdict Mrs Sherman was a woman of 72 years who died on 20 August 2020 at Warwick Hospital. Mrs Sherman's cause of death was determined by a post mortem examination to be la Subarachno1d and lntracerebellar Haemorrhage lb Systemic Hypertension. On 13 August 2020, Mrs Sherman contacted her GP by telephone. He was concerned about her symptoms and referred her to the Ambulatory Emergency Centre{AEC) at Warwick Hospital. The GP telephoned the hospital and indicated that Mrs Sherman needed a scan to exclude a subarachno1d haemorrhage {SAH). He also emailed a referral letter expl1c1tly stating that Mrs Sherman's presentation should be considered a SAH until proven otherwise. She was m1sd1agnosed and discharged without a scan. Neither the notes of the GP's telephone call nor the GP's email were seen by the treating staff except for final doctor who saw her 1mmed1ately prior to discharge. On 15 August 2020, Mrs Sherman re-attended Warwick Hospital. She was seen by a doctor in Emergency Department. He did not have access to the GP's letter or notes from the attendance on 13th August 2020. The discharge summary from 13th August 2020 would have been available but medical staff were unaware of this. Mrs Shem a n's symptoms were unchanged from her earlier attendance On 20th August 2020, Mrs Sherman suddenly collapsed at home and was brought to Warwick Hospital by ambulance. A CT scan performed at 15.41 hours confirmed a SAH. She died later that day. The clinical errors (two m1sd1agnoses and failure to read GP referral letter) and systemic errors (GP referral letter and AEC notes not available on 15th August 2020) 7 contributed to her death and constitute neglect notwithstanding her presentation of SAH was atypical. CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE DEATH See above CORONER'S CONCERNS During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters g1v1ng nse to concern In my opinion there 1s a nsk that future deaths could occur unless action 1s taken In the circumstances 1t 1s my statutory duty to report to you The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows ­ (1) Two m1sd1agnoses at Warwick Hospital notwithstanding the GP spec1f1cally stating in writing that Mrs Sherman should be treated as a SAH unless a CT scan showed to the contrary (2) Systemic errors regarding the inab1l1ty of the GP team at Warwick Hospital to access the electronic record and the slowness of notes being scanned on to the system. ACTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and I believe you have the power to take such action YOUR RESPONSE You are under a duty to respond to this report w1th1n 56 days of the date of this report, namely by 21 January 2021 I, the coroner, may extend the period Your response must contain details of action taken or proposed to be taken, setting out the timetable for action Otherwise you must explain why no action 1s proposed COPIES and PUBLICATION I have sent a copy of my report to the Chief Coroner and to the following Interested Persons Mrs (daughter) I am also under a duty to send a copy of your response to the Chief Coroner and all interested persons who in my opinion should receive it I may also send a copy of your response to any other person who I believe may find 1t useful or of interest The Chief Coroner may publish either or both in a complete or redacted or summary form He may send a copy of this report to any person who he believes may find 1t useful or of interest You may make representations to me, the coroner, at the time of your response, about the release or the publication of your response 26 November 2020 S. McGovern 9
Circumstances of the Death
See above
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Patient Records Audit
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Hepatologist Oversight and Fibroscan Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Specialist Hepatology Centre Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Uncertainty About Fibrosis
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Fibroscan for Liver Imaging
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Consultant Hepatologist Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Commissioning Hepatology Services
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Blood Test Result Documentation
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.