Arthur Jepson

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2019-0300
Date of Report 16 September 2019
Coroner David Urpeth
Response Deadline ✓ from report 11 November 2019
All 1 response received · Deadline: 11 Nov 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
High resource pressure resulted in a missed two-hour review of an emergency call, preventing re-categorisation and potentially impacting outcomes in future cases.
View full coroner's concerns
During the inquest, evidence showed:-

1. that the pressure on resources was high that day.
2. that a review at the two hour point should have taken place to ascertain if the matter needed re categorisation.
3. Such a review didn’t happen.
4. Whilst the evidence at inquest was that this is unlikely to have changed the outcome in this case, it was a concern to me that it could be in another case.
Responses
Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS / Health Body
20 Nov 2019
Action Taken
The Trust has refreshed its approach to call-backs, implementing a filter in the CAD system to highlight incidents exceeding expected timeframes, and assigning senior clinical advisors to make call-backs. Reporting mechanisms are being implemented to ensure call-back procedures are followed. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Re_Prevention of Future Deaths report _ Mr_Arthur_Jepson write further to your letter enclosing your prevention of future deaths report following the inquest of Mr. Arthur Jepson, which the Trust received on 25 September 2019. Firstly , may extend my apologies on behalf of Yorkshire Ambulance Service NHS Trust to the family of the late Mr. Jepson: Following Mr. Jepson's inquest on 3 October 2019 at the Medico-Legal Centre, Sheffield you outlined your concerns regarding the apparent lack of a review of Mr. Jepson's call following a two hour period to ascertain whether the incident needed re-categorisation: Although as described in your letter; you felt that given the evidence heard at the inquest it would have been unlikely to have changed the outcome for the late Mr. Jepson, were concerned that this may have an impact upon other patients' care As outlined in the Trust's letter to you dated 4 October 2019 from the Legal Services Department; it is regrettable that information regarding the Trust's call-back standard operating procedure was not alluded to in written and oral evidence and to provide assurance that there was and continues to procedure in place to ensure that incidents are reviewed once the expected response timescales had been exceeded. As was heard within the oral and written evidence at the inquest; the Trust was experiencing high demand at the time of Mr. Jepson's call, especially within the area of South Yorkshire and unfortunately a call-back was not made to Mr. Jepson once two hours had elapsed for which apologise. Your letter has prompted the Trust to refresh its approach to dealing with such matters and to build upon work already ongoing within the Emergency Operations Centres EOCs") with improving its processes and procedures. As outlined within the letter from the Trust on 4 October 2019, there is work currently ongoing to create a centralised Senior Clinical Advisor standard operating procedure ("SOP") and the current call-backs and comfort calls SOP has been identified as forming an integral part of this revised central SOP. 4626, MINDFUL WWW:yas nhs.uk EMPLOYER 8 Sir, you be, Wing 1 91543149

The new centralised Senior Clinical Advisor standard operating procedure was ratified at an internal governance meeting on 19 November 2019 and it is anticipated that the new procedure will be in place by early December 2019. It is intended that at times of high demand, or for patient care, it may be appropriate for senior clinical advisors ("SCAs") to undertake call backs and comfort calls. To provide a structured approach to this process a filter exists within the computer aided dispatch ("CAD") system and this filter allows for incidents which have exceeded their expected timeframe to be viewed separately from other incidents awaiting dispatch by the allocated clinician. In addition to this, any incident to breach the mean time will be visible_ The SCA should speak with the patient wherever possible and should introduce themselves and ask if anything has changed since the initial call was made: If no change has occurred, the SCA will explore the options of alternative transport however if this is unavailable or not a possible option, then the SCA will reassure the patient that an ambulance response will be with them as soon as possible and advise them to call back via 999 if the patient's condition deteriorates. If there has been change in the patient's conditions then a Manchester Triage System ("MTS") triage must be completed by the clinician and re-categorised as appropriate , dedicated upgrade / downgrade code: It is expected that Category incidents with excessive response times will be assessed and given support by the dedicated Category Clinician separate to the process outlined above. In order to gain assurances that the processes are effective , reporting mechanisms shall be put in place to ensure that the revised call-back procedures are undertaken and ensuring that any excessive incidents receive regular contact to establish whether the Trust's response is still appropriate and safe_ trust this letter is to your satisfaction and once again, my sincerest condolences to the family of Mr: Jepson:
Sent To
  • Yorkshire Ambulance Service
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 11 Nov 2019
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 3.10.18, an investigation into the death of Arthur William Jepson was commenced. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 16.9.19. The conclusion of the inquest was Natural Causes
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Jepson suffered stomach pain and called 999. The evidence was that the initial call was made at 15.32. That call was initially triaged as Category 5 but when the paramedic telephoned an hour later the matter was re classified at category 3. The ambulance arrived at 19.31.

.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Transfusion Laboratory Staffing
Infected Blood Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Training in Transfusion Medicine
Infected Blood Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Resolve paramedic-driver shortage in mass casualties
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
LRF staffing and resources
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Ambulance Liaison Officer resourcing
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Review embedding doctors with firearms teams
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Ambulance trusts submit resource recommendations
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Sufficient resources for operational planning
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Review NWAS Tactical Advisor numbers
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.