Gladys Furnival

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2019-0270
Date of Report 14 August 2019
Coroner Heath Westerman
Coroner Area Cheshire
Response Deadline est. 13 December 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The ambulance service lacks a protocol to engage other emergency services for assistance or updates during significant delays when there is no direct observation of the scene.
View full coroner's concerns
_ (0When the ambulance service_is faced with significant delays in circumstances where July The day there are no eye s on the ground, there was no provision to utilise the other emergency services to assist in its place or to provide an update to them:
Sent To
  • Cheshire Constabulary
  • Cheshire Fire and Rescue
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • North West Ambulance
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 4
56-Day Deadline 13 Dec 2019
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 11th July 2018 an investigation was commenced into the death of Gladys Esme FURNIVAL (known as Esme FURNIVAL) dob 5th September 1926. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 10lh 2019. The conclusion of the inquest was accidental death. medical cause of death was Ia multi organ failure, 1b traumatic ischaemic injury to abdomen and Ic fall.
Circumstances of the Death
At approximately 12.30hrs on Sunday 8" July 2018 Esme Furnival had an unwitnessed fall at her home address a sheltered accommodation in Holmes Chapel, Cheshire , whereby her dressing gown waist cord was caught in the fridge thereby suspending her body with her legs on the floor and her upper body off the floor. Careline monitoring services received a call from Esme at 12.40hrs during which they separately called 999 services at 12.44hrs That call was given a category 3 response with an expected response time of 90"h percentile of 120 minutes. North West Ambulance Service called Careline back at 14.43hrs to inform them that there was significant delay to responding that due to the volume of calls received. The response was not upgraded to a category 2 but Esme was placed as the top priority within the waiting category 3 responses The ambulance service arrived at her flat at 17.23hrs and she was transported to Leighton hospital where she sadly died on 9ih July 2018 Careline are a remote service and they attempted to contact the manager of the sheltered home and the listed next of kin without success
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken t0 prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Out-of-school settings guidance update
Southport Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Police use of unarmed officers in immediate threat
Southport Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Second Force Incident Manager support
Southport Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
NWAS Major Incident declaration procedures
Southport Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Pandemic Decision-Making Framework
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Leadership Succession Arrangements
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Central Emergency Taskforces
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Civil Contingencies Act Review
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Devolved Nations COBR Attendance
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans
Four Nations Pandemic Structure
COVID-19 Inquiry
Emergency contingency plans

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.