Geoffrey Jackson

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2019-0071
Date of Report 26 February 2019
Coroner Chris Morris
Response Deadline ✓ from report 23 April 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The report indicates general concerns were raised during the inquest, but specific details regarding the identified risks were not provided in the text.
Sent To
  • Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 23 Apr 2019
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 14th November 2018, Rachel Galloway, Assistant Coroner for Manchester South opened a inquest into the death of Mr Geoffrey Jackson, who died at Trafford General Hospital on 6th November 2018 aged 87 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest which heard on 19th February 2019 At the end of the inquest, recorded a narrative conclusion that Mr Jackson died as a consequence of natural causes contributed to by 'recognised complications of recent surgery:
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Jackson'$ medical history included ischaemic heart disease and coronary artery disease. He had previously suffered two myocardial infarctions, but was considered stable by the cardiologists who kept him under regular review as an outpatient_ Mr Jackson'$ mobility had declined in recent years, as a consequence of osteoarthritis of both knees and the left hip joint: On 28th September 2018,Mr Jackson was admitted to Manchester Royal Infirmary for an elective (acknowledged to be high-risk) hip replacement procedure under the care of The surgery proceeded without incident; however Mr Jackson became unwell in its aftermath, having experienced a cardiac event developed hospital acquired pneumonia_ On 25th October 2018,Mr Jackson was transferred to Trafford General Hospital for rehabilitation, via the Acute Medical Unit: On 1s November 2018, Mr Jackson was moved to Ward 6. A Risk of Falls assessment undertaken on the Acute Medical Unit had identified Mr Jackson as being at risk of falls. Upon transfer to Ward 6, there was a delay in completing a further Risk of Falls Assessment within the timescales prescribed by Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust: and

On 3rd November 2018, Mr Jackson removed his NG feeding tube, and according to his daughter was exhibiting signs ofagitation. Despite this and the fact he was moved to a side room, no repeat Risk of Falls Assessment was undertaken: Later that Mr Jackson was found on the floor near his bed, having sustained an unwitnessed fall: In view of the fact Mr Jackson appeared to have sustained a head injury, a junior doctor sought to obtain a CT scan: This was, however, never undertaken: Mr Jackson died on 6th November 2018 as a consequence of: 1a) Congestive Cardiac Failure; b) Ischaemic Heart Disease
2) Left Replacement and Hospital Acquired Pneumonia There was no evidence before the court to suggest that the fall on 3r November 2018 contributed to, Or materially hastened, Mr Jackson's death
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you and your organisation have the power to take such action: Notwithstanding the actions which have been taken following the Trust'$ investigation into the circumstances of Mr Jackson'$ fall, a spot-check recently undertaken by the Matron on Ward 6 found 2 out of 32 patients had not had Risks of Falls Assessments completed in accordance with Trust requirements; A further matter of concern arose from the manner in which nursing records are made at Trafford General Hospital, with an emphasis on proforma care plans which simply require signing and dating by nurses, observation charts, and sheets upon which variances from the care plans can be recorded: It is a matter of concern that the absence of any requirement upon the nurse looking after a patient for a given shift to make a structured narrative record of what transpires over that period represents a missed opportunity to capture nuanced changes in a patient'$ condition, and communicate these to others
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Investigations
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Clinical negligence harms learning
Use of information about compliance by regulator from: Media
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Clinical negligence harms learning
NHS Litigation Authority Improvement of risk management
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Clinical negligence harms learning
NHS Litigation Authority Improvement of risk management
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Clinical negligence harms learning
NHS Litigation Authority Improvement of risk management
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Clinical negligence harms learning
Evidence-based assessment
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Clinical negligence harms learning
Information sharing
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Patient safety governance Clinical negligence harms learning
IPC Structures and Transmission Risk
COVID-19 Inquiry
Patient safety governance
ICU Resource Allocation Framework
COVID-19 Inquiry
Patient safety governance
HTA require anatomy adverse incidents reported as HTARIs
Fuller Inquiry
Patient safety governance

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.