Sheila Graham

PFD Report Historic (No Identified Response) Ref: 2018-0355
Date of Report 16 November 2018
Coroner Margaret Jones
Response Deadline est. 20 June 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Prolonged social isolation for a patient with C. difficile negatively impacted her well-being, compounded by inadequate nutritional information recording and assessment.
Sent To
  • Midlands Partnership NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 0 of 1
56-Day Deadline 20 Jun 2019
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 30/10/2017 commenced an investigation into the death of Sheila Graham: The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on ISth November 2018. The conclusion of the inquest was that the deceased died from a combination of natural causes, an accident and the effects of necessary antibiotic therapy: The deceased was 79 years of age. She was a smoker and obese. Her medical history included hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hip replacement, cellulitis and heart disease with a pace maker fitted: She had a history of about 12 months of vomiting which she put down to her Digoxin medication: She had been in hospital a few months earlier and had been treated with antibiotics for a chest infection. On the 7th July 2017 she suffered a fall at home and was admitted to the Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent: A complicated fracture of the left ankle was diagnosed: Due to her co-morbidities she was not suitable for surgery and a cast was applied. She was transferred to Haywood Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent where on admission there was evidence of abnormal blood results indicating infection and clinical signs of cellulitis. She was treated with antibiotics targeting that particular infection. She developed clostridium difficile: The fracture failed to heal and this together with her existing co-morbidities resulted in prolonged immobilisation and hospitalisation. Progression with physiotherapy was minimal. She required nursing in isolation and this affected her mental and general wellbeing: Nausea and vomiting were ongoing problems caused by constipation. On the 12th July 2017 she declined further investigations. She was also observed putting her fingers down her throat which induced blood stained vomit: She was referred to a dietician, mental health services and a nutritional chart was commenced following a multi-disciplinary meeting arranged at the request of the family. She had not been assessed as nutritionally at risk however recording of nutritional information was inadequate: On the 18th September 2017 she developed coffee ground vomiting: This occurred again on the 19th and she was transferred back to the Royal Stoke University Hospital: She was dehydrated and was treated for an upper gastrointestinal bleed She did not recover and died there at 11.5Spm on the 13th October 2017 cORONER'S CQNCERNS During _the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern: In my drug being opinion there is a risk that future deaths occur unless action is taken. In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report to you: The MATTERS OF CONCERN are as follows_ (1) At the inquest it was evident that the deceased had suffered with clostridium difficile diarrhoea. It was accepted by the patient and the family that she needed to be nursed in a single room: However in her case it was for a very prolonged period. The social isolation had a significant impact on her health and well-being and was a factor in her failure to recover. No policy appears to be in place for referral to mental health services in such circumstances Referral in this case was prompted by the family: (2) There was evidence that meals were delivered by an independent company called Sodex: The family frequently observed this company giving out and collecting meal trays. Despite this medical records appeared to have been completed daily by nursing and health care staff recording adequate nutrition. Given this situation how is it possible to reconcile the nursing records with the practice of the catering team distributing and collecting meal trays? (3) The deceased lost weight: There was no referral to a dietician until prompted by the family.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you Or your organisation has the power to take such action
Copies Sent To
Trent & North Staffordshire will very
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Patient Records Audit
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Blood Test Result Documentation
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Recording Clinical Discussions
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Improve perinatal mortality recording
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Detainee Capture and Condition Records
Al-Sweady Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Medical Fitness for Detention Forms
Al-Sweady Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
CDI patient information
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Patient records compliance audit
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.