Henry Curtis-Williams

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2018-0397
Date of Report 19 December 2018
Coroner Sean Cummings
Coroner Area London (West)
Response Deadline ✓ from report 12 February 2019
All 1 response received · Deadline: 12 Feb 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A culture of inadequate contemporaneous note-taking, especially regarding suicidal ideation, and informal, unrecorded staff communication led to critical information being lost. Junior doctors could discharge high-risk patients without senior review.
View full coroner's concerns
_ (1) That following admission to Southgate Ward Curtis-Williams was seen by a number of different staff members. It became evident that there was a culture of not recording contemporaneous notes_ This was very obvious with reference to recording presence or absence of suicidal ideation: (2) There was an acceptance that patients could be discharged by junior doctors without prior reference to Consultant or Senior colleagues even though Henry had been admitted after assessed by 2 Section 12 approved doctors and an Approved Mental Health Professional who felt he needed a prolonged inpatient stay: Communication between staff members was very _informal with no_record Henry May day Henry very being kept of important messages relayed. For example, the member of staff who held a one to one meeting with Henry was not present at the ward round where Henry's case was discussed but said she had verbally passed a message to the ward round nurse This was normal practice on this ward. There was no record of the message, or of it passed or that it was considered at the ward round.
Responses
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Trust NHS / Health Body
19 Dec 2018
Action Planned
The Trust will be using the case in learning via patient safety newsletter and practice education teams. The Trust issued an internal alert to inpatient wards directing reflection on processes where information is received from differing sources. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Cummings Re: Mr Henry Curtis-Williams write in response to your report dated 19 December 2018_ Under paragraph 7 Schedule 5, of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013 you requested the Trust consider issues of service delivery following the conclusion of the inquest into the death of Mr Henry Curtis-Williams You raise a number of areas of concern which respond to in order: Recording of contemporaneous notes You identified concern that there was culture of not recording contemporaneous notes, most obviously related to the recording of the presence or absence of suicidal ideation. agree it is critical that the service user's health record demonstrates the care provided in meeting their individual need. In Henry's case , he had been admitted following period of experiencing suicidal thoughts, with reasonable to expect these symptoms were checked during interactions, then to be followed up with the details of discussion recorded in the health record. The Trust's Health record policy provides guidance that entries should be made into the health record as soon as possible from the time of the event_ The policy further outlines the requirement of clinical judgement to determine what information to record. To support staff, the Trust will be using Henry's case in the provision of learning via our,patient safety newsletter and: through the range of practice education teams and staff receive. Linked to under the leadership of the Medical Director, the Trust is commencing a programme of work to examine the barriers to using 'clinical curiosity' and develop the skills and frameworks for staff to ensure this critical aspect of care is consistently applied: Discharge You identified concern that Henry was discharged by a junior doctor without prior reference to Consultant or senior colleague. Discharge from hospital can represent a period of uncertainty and risk for the service user: Therefore, it is right to observe that such decisions must be made using members of the multi-disciplinary team who have required knowledge and skills to support a safe and supportive discharge. Following receipt of your report the Trust has completed an audit to examine the current practice applied: Reviewing eighty-two records, from discharges completed in August and September 2018, the audit confirmed 96% had evidence within the health record that a senior doctor or Consultant had been part of the decision of discharge. To strengthen this, the Medical Director has Working together Chair: Marie Gabriel CBE Chief Executive: Antek Lejk Trust Headquarters: Hellesdon Hospital, Drayton High Road, Norwich NR6 SBE for better mental health Tel: 01603 421421 Fax: 01603 421341

this, the

Jed learning to Consultant Psychiatrists and teaching will be provided to junior doctors as part of their induction to the Trust: Communication between staff You observed that communication between staff was very. informal with no record of important messages relayed. You referenced that information did not reach the ward round, Communication is a vital component in maintaining safe and effective care_ The Trust uses systems such as an electronic patient record to document patient care, as well as frameworks to handover information (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR)) : However, this tragic event highlights the human aspect of receiving information and ensuring is fed into these communication structures. There is no current single evidence-based tool which can be implemented to eliminate this potential. However, shared understanding amongst staff of the processes of receiving information is critical to reduce variance_ Following some recent learning, the Trust had issued an internal alert to all our inpatient wards directing reflection on the points Where information is received from differing sources eg service users, families and carers and whether there is a shared process or understanding of how to ensure that information is captured Where there may not be a shared understanding the ward will work to address this Feedback from this alert is received currently which will then be shared across the wards to promote wider learning. If | can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me_
Sent To
  • Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 12 Feb 2019
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the ih July 2016 an Inquest was opened into the death of Henry Curtis-Williams. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on the 7ih November 2018.The conclusion of the inquest was (2) Hanging (4) Suicide
Circumstances of the Death
Curtis-Williams died from hanging at Acton Cemetery on the 17th 2018 He had been admitted to the Woodlands Unit on the 11lh May 2016 under police section 136 after he was found contemplating jumping off the Orwell Bridge in Ipswich. He was transferred to nearby Southgate Ward after a mental health assessment: He was discharged the next without a Consultant review. He travelled to London where he was attending University and was seen and comprehensively assessed by his GP. He died sometime later.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths believe you the Chief Executive of Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust have the power to take such action.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Patient Records Audit
Infected Blood Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Blood Test Result Documentation
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Recording Clinical Discussions
Hyponatraemia Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Improve perinatal mortality recording
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Detainee Capture and Condition Records
Al-Sweady Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Medical Fitness for Detention Forms
Al-Sweady Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
CDI patient information
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Patient records compliance audit
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.