Kalma Ram-Henman
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2018-0306
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 14 Apr 2019
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Multiple clinical failings included an incomplete fluid chart, unadministered essential medications and fluids despite orders, missed ECG abnormalities, and neglected opportunities to assess a deteriorating patient after transfer.
View full coroner's concerns
(1) This lady arrived in A&E in a “precarious” state as the blood test results revealed and there were several failings:-
VERONICA HAMILTON-DEELEY DL, LL.B. Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for the City of Brighton & Hove
THE CORONER’S OFFICE WOODVALE, LEWES ROAD BRIGHTON
Assistant Coroners CATHARINE PALMER LL.B (HONS) GILVA D.J.TISSHAW, BA(LAW)HONS
Telephone: Brighton (01273) 292046 Fax: Brighton (01273) 292047 The attending Doctor required an accurate fluid chart. This was started. It was incompletely filled out and showed no output and no attempts were made to measure any output. As a result, Doctors and Nurses were unaware of just how dehydrated Mrs RAM-HENMAN was becoming.
(2) An ECG was ordered which showed abnormalities likely associated with her low potassium level. This was not seen by the doctor who requested it. The signature on it is illegible. A second ECG should have been requested. It was not. She was written up for potassium in A&E as well as intravenous fluids but was given no potassium and only half a litre of intravenous fluids in her entire 24 hour admission. It was the view of the Doctors giving the evidence that she should have received at least four litres to deal with her depleted state. So instructions given within three to four hours of her arrival in A&E (at 12.12pm on 6/6/2018) were not implemented. Why not?
(3) Opportunities to realise that sodium and fluids had not been administered were missed overnight when Mrs RAM-HENMAN was transferred from A&E to Bristol Ward and was seen in the early hours of the 7th. It seems her notes were not read so the failure to give fluids and potassium was missed.
(4) On the morning of the 7th at around 10.30 am. the attending Doctor wanted Mrs RAM-HENMAN to be given Cyclazine, intravenous fluids and for her to have a CT scan. None of this was achieved before her death two hours later. She should have at least received the intravenous fluids and the Cyclazine. Again it seems that at this stage there was a failure to realise that she had not been given the Potassium she had been written up for in A&E.
(5) Mrs RAM-HENMAN only had one set of bloods done. At Inquest I was told that she should have had more bloods for comparison. These would undoubtedly have shown her deteriorating condition and would have acted as an additional reminder of the failings in her care.
(6) It may be that her transfer from A&E to Bristol Ward at around 5.30 – 6.30pm on the afternoon of the 6th June (a Thursday) coincided with a time of hiatus on the ward but there should not have been an assumption that she should simply be put in a bed and left until the morning ward round and as I say it seems there was an opportunity missed when she deteriorated in the night and a doctor was asked to see her.
VERONICA HAMILTON-DEELEY DL, LL.B. Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for the City of Brighton & Hove
THE CORONER’S OFFICE WOODVALE, LEWES ROAD BRIGHTON
Assistant Coroners CATHARINE PALMER LL.B (HONS) GILVA D.J.TISSHAW, BA(LAW)HONS
Telephone: Brighton (01273) 292046 Fax: Brighton (01273) 292047 (7) It transpires that Mrs RAM-HENMAN had a large gastric ulcer which perforated. This in itself is a life threatening emergency and her presentation was unusual. From the evidence I heard it was clear that although there is no guarantee that she would have survived the perforation, had she been optimised in terms of fluids and Potassium her cardio vascular reserve would have been considerably better.
VERONICA HAMILTON-DEELEY DL, LL.B. Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for the City of Brighton & Hove
THE CORONER’S OFFICE WOODVALE, LEWES ROAD BRIGHTON
Assistant Coroners CATHARINE PALMER LL.B (HONS) GILVA D.J.TISSHAW, BA(LAW)HONS
Telephone: Brighton (01273) 292046 Fax: Brighton (01273) 292047 The attending Doctor required an accurate fluid chart. This was started. It was incompletely filled out and showed no output and no attempts were made to measure any output. As a result, Doctors and Nurses were unaware of just how dehydrated Mrs RAM-HENMAN was becoming.
(2) An ECG was ordered which showed abnormalities likely associated with her low potassium level. This was not seen by the doctor who requested it. The signature on it is illegible. A second ECG should have been requested. It was not. She was written up for potassium in A&E as well as intravenous fluids but was given no potassium and only half a litre of intravenous fluids in her entire 24 hour admission. It was the view of the Doctors giving the evidence that she should have received at least four litres to deal with her depleted state. So instructions given within three to four hours of her arrival in A&E (at 12.12pm on 6/6/2018) were not implemented. Why not?
(3) Opportunities to realise that sodium and fluids had not been administered were missed overnight when Mrs RAM-HENMAN was transferred from A&E to Bristol Ward and was seen in the early hours of the 7th. It seems her notes were not read so the failure to give fluids and potassium was missed.
(4) On the morning of the 7th at around 10.30 am. the attending Doctor wanted Mrs RAM-HENMAN to be given Cyclazine, intravenous fluids and for her to have a CT scan. None of this was achieved before her death two hours later. She should have at least received the intravenous fluids and the Cyclazine. Again it seems that at this stage there was a failure to realise that she had not been given the Potassium she had been written up for in A&E.
(5) Mrs RAM-HENMAN only had one set of bloods done. At Inquest I was told that she should have had more bloods for comparison. These would undoubtedly have shown her deteriorating condition and would have acted as an additional reminder of the failings in her care.
(6) It may be that her transfer from A&E to Bristol Ward at around 5.30 – 6.30pm on the afternoon of the 6th June (a Thursday) coincided with a time of hiatus on the ward but there should not have been an assumption that she should simply be put in a bed and left until the morning ward round and as I say it seems there was an opportunity missed when she deteriorated in the night and a doctor was asked to see her.
VERONICA HAMILTON-DEELEY DL, LL.B. Her Majesty’s Senior Coroner for the City of Brighton & Hove
THE CORONER’S OFFICE WOODVALE, LEWES ROAD BRIGHTON
Assistant Coroners CATHARINE PALMER LL.B (HONS) GILVA D.J.TISSHAW, BA(LAW)HONS
Telephone: Brighton (01273) 292046 Fax: Brighton (01273) 292047 (7) It transpires that Mrs RAM-HENMAN had a large gastric ulcer which perforated. This in itself is a life threatening emergency and her presentation was unusual. From the evidence I heard it was clear that although there is no guarantee that she would have survived the perforation, had she been optimised in terms of fluids and Potassium her cardio vascular reserve would have been considerably better.
Responses
Action Taken
Brighton and Sussex University NHS Trust conducted team meetings and a Serious Incident Review Meeting to address inadequacies in the patient's care. They issued a Trust Safety Alert instructing staff not to use the 'once-only' section of the drug chart for infusions, and implemented a new system for Acute Medicine Consultants to cover telephone calls. (AI summary)
Brighton and Sussex University NHS Trust conducted team meetings and a Serious Incident Review Meeting to address inadequacies in the patient's care. They issued a Trust Safety Alert instructing staff not to use the 'once-only' section of the drug chart for infusions, and implemented a new system for Acute Medicine Consultants to cover telephone calls. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Miss Hamilton Deeley Mrs Kalma (Kamla) Ram-Henman deceased am in response to the Regulation 28 Report which was issued following the inquest for Mrs Ram-Henman_ am grateful to you for having extended the deadline for response, in order that we could complete discussions concerning the Action Plan, as part of the Serious Incident (Sl) investigation process attach a copy of the Sl report for information, a copy of which will be sent to Mr Ram-Henman: would first like to express my condolences to Mr Ram-Henman and his family and friends for their very sad loss: Mrs Ram-Henman's death was a tragic event which has deeply affected all the staff involved. am very that there were inadequacies in Mrs Ram-Henman's care which compromised her to withstand a perforated gastric ulcer: know that these events were shocking and distressing for Mr Ram-Henman and his family Following the inquest; discussions took place in team meetings for the clinical specialities involved, involving medical and nursing staff; to ensure that staff awareness of the learning issues took place as soon as possible. The inquest findings were reviewed at the Trust's Serious Incident Review Meeting, chaired byl Deputy Medical Director: Safety and Quality, and this concluded that an Sl investigation shouid be undertaken: In addition,a General Medicine Morbidity and Mortality Meeting has taken place, also attended by senior clinical staff from the Emergency Department (ED), to review the issues arising from Mrs Ram-Henman's care_ The attached Sl report contains the Action with timescales for implementation of the measures agreed. As you will see, we have implemented a new SBAR telephone handover form (copy attached for reference) as part of the revision of the Emergency Department Safety Booklet The form includes prompts for staff on drains and lines present; and medication issues. In the longer term, the implementation of an Electronic Prescribing System will ensure that the problems that Lont writing sorry ability Plan
occurred with administration of Mrs Ram-Henman's fluids and potassium not happen again and we estimate that the new system will be in place in approximately 18 months. The Sl investigation also showed that it has been habitual for some staff to use the "once-only section of the drug prescription chart; when prescribing fluidldrug infusions. This section was designed to be used by ED clinicians who may need to prescribe antibiotics for patients with a suspected chest infection or who need pain relief;, who are then discharged from ED. It is not appropriate to use this section for IV infusions and a Trust Safety Alert has been issued, instructing all staff not to use this section of the drug chart for infusions and that any such prescription should be completed in the normal section of the chart A prompt will also be added to the front of the drug chart; reminding staff of this requirement During review of Ram-Henman's care_ it was also noted that at the time of her admission to the ward a member of the pharmacy team documented their review of previous drug history but there was no documentation concerning review of ongoing drugs prescribed. The relevant Lead Pharmacist will discuss this with the member of staff concerned and with the wider team to emphasise the importance of documenting such reviews in the patient records. Finally _ Consultant in Acute Medicine and Clinical Lead for Ambulatory Care, has implemented a new system whereby an Acute Medicine Consultant will cover telephone calls whilst another Acute Medicine Consultant sees patients when requested. This will ensure that the Consultant seeing patients is released from answering calls and will allow more time for review and follow up of clinical plans_ hope this letter is helpful in addressing the concerns you raised but if you need any further information please do not hesitate to contact me_ would be grateful if you could pass on my apologies ta and his family for those aspects of Mrs Ram-Henman's care which fell below the standard which we expect and for all the distress this has caused.
occurred with administration of Mrs Ram-Henman's fluids and potassium not happen again and we estimate that the new system will be in place in approximately 18 months. The Sl investigation also showed that it has been habitual for some staff to use the "once-only section of the drug prescription chart; when prescribing fluidldrug infusions. This section was designed to be used by ED clinicians who may need to prescribe antibiotics for patients with a suspected chest infection or who need pain relief;, who are then discharged from ED. It is not appropriate to use this section for IV infusions and a Trust Safety Alert has been issued, instructing all staff not to use this section of the drug chart for infusions and that any such prescription should be completed in the normal section of the chart A prompt will also be added to the front of the drug chart; reminding staff of this requirement During review of Ram-Henman's care_ it was also noted that at the time of her admission to the ward a member of the pharmacy team documented their review of previous drug history but there was no documentation concerning review of ongoing drugs prescribed. The relevant Lead Pharmacist will discuss this with the member of staff concerned and with the wider team to emphasise the importance of documenting such reviews in the patient records. Finally _ Consultant in Acute Medicine and Clinical Lead for Ambulatory Care, has implemented a new system whereby an Acute Medicine Consultant will cover telephone calls whilst another Acute Medicine Consultant sees patients when requested. This will ensure that the Consultant seeing patients is released from answering calls and will allow more time for review and follow up of clinical plans_ hope this letter is helpful in addressing the concerns you raised but if you need any further information please do not hesitate to contact me_ would be grateful if you could pass on my apologies ta and his family for those aspects of Mrs Ram-Henman's care which fell below the standard which we expect and for all the distress this has caused.
Sent To
- Brighton & Sussex University Hospitals NHS trust
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
14 Apr 2019
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 16th October 2018 I commenced an investigation into the death of Kalma RAM-HENMAN, otherwise Kamla otherwise Kamala. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 16th October, 2018.The conclusion of the inquest was a NARRATIVE CONCLUSION as per the attached sheet.
Circumstances of the Death
See Record of Inquest
Copies Sent To
2. Acute Medical Consultant, Royal Sussex County Hospital
3. , Consultant in Diabetes and Endocrinology, Royal Sussex County Hospital
4. Medico
Legal Services Manager, Royal Sussex County Hospital
5. Brighton and Hove Clinical Commissioning Group
6. Care Quality Commission
7. Secretary of State for Health, Department of Health
8. Simon Stevens, Chief Executive, NHS England
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.