Paul James
PFD Report
Partially Responded
Ref: 2018-0254
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A prisoner with a serious self-harm history was permitted access to razor blades in a single cell, reflecting inadequate risk assessment and safety protocols for vulnerable individuals.
View full coroner's concerns
This was a prisoner with a known history of serious self harm even before 8/7/16. On that day he had used razor blades to inflict very serious injuries to himself. He was known to have ceased taking his prescribed medication. He was placed in a single cell and permitted access to razor blades again. Following Mr James being found dead in his cell on 20/12/16
Responses
Action Planned
HM Prison & Probation Service will issue a learning bulletin on managing razor blade risks, pilot a revised ACCT case management process prompting consideration of razor blade access, and consider broader options for managing the issue. (AI summary)
HM Prison & Probation Service will issue a learning bulletin on managing razor blade risks, pilot a revised ACCT case management process prompting consideration of razor blade access, and consider broader options for managing the issue. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Sutton-Mattocks
Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report of 9 April 2018 following the recent inquest into the death of Paul James at HMP Elmley on 20 December 2016.
I know that you will share a copy of this response with Mr James’ family and I would like first to express my condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy and the safety of those in our care is my absolute priority.
Your concern is the availability of razor blades to prisoners with a history of self-harm by using them, and you have suggested that further investigation and research is undertaken to develop protocols and procedures to deny prisoners access to razor blades in these circumstances.
I understand that you were made aware during the inquest that as part of the requirement to have safe systems of work in place, there is an expectation that measures will be in place at each prison to assess and manage the risk posed by the availability of disposable razors as a means of self-harm. This was most recently re- enforced in a letter from Phil Copple, the Executive Director of Prisons, to Governors in April 2018.
In response to your concerns, we are taking a number of further actions. First, we will be issuing a learning bulletin within the next few weeks that draws on the example of this case to re-emphasise the risk presented by access to razor blades
and provides further guidance on how to manage them. Second, early in 2019 we will be piloting a revised version of the ACCT case management process for prisoners at risk of self-harm and suicide, and we will ensure that the revised documentation that is being introduced prompts case managers specifically to consider the risks associated with razor blades, and whether or not it is appropriate to take steps to restrict access, as part of each individual case review. Finally, the Prison Safety Team is giving further consideration to a broader range of options for managing this issue, including the practicality of further controls on access and the availability of safer alternatives to disposable razors.
Thank you again for bringing these matters of concern to my attention. I hope that this response provides reassurance that learning from this tragic incident is being shared widely across the prison estate.
Thank you for your Regulation 28 Report of 9 April 2018 following the recent inquest into the death of Paul James at HMP Elmley on 20 December 2016.
I know that you will share a copy of this response with Mr James’ family and I would like first to express my condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy and the safety of those in our care is my absolute priority.
Your concern is the availability of razor blades to prisoners with a history of self-harm by using them, and you have suggested that further investigation and research is undertaken to develop protocols and procedures to deny prisoners access to razor blades in these circumstances.
I understand that you were made aware during the inquest that as part of the requirement to have safe systems of work in place, there is an expectation that measures will be in place at each prison to assess and manage the risk posed by the availability of disposable razors as a means of self-harm. This was most recently re- enforced in a letter from Phil Copple, the Executive Director of Prisons, to Governors in April 2018.
In response to your concerns, we are taking a number of further actions. First, we will be issuing a learning bulletin within the next few weeks that draws on the example of this case to re-emphasise the risk presented by access to razor blades
and provides further guidance on how to manage them. Second, early in 2019 we will be piloting a revised version of the ACCT case management process for prisoners at risk of self-harm and suicide, and we will ensure that the revised documentation that is being introduced prompts case managers specifically to consider the risks associated with razor blades, and whether or not it is appropriate to take steps to restrict access, as part of each individual case review. Finally, the Prison Safety Team is giving further consideration to a broader range of options for managing this issue, including the practicality of further controls on access and the availability of safer alternatives to disposable razors.
Thank you again for bringing these matters of concern to my attention. I hope that this response provides reassurance that learning from this tragic incident is being shared widely across the prison estate.
Sent To
- HMP Elmley
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 2
56-Day Deadline
20 Nov 2018
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.