Josh Tarrant (3)
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2026-0077
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 6 Apr 2026
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Healthcare and prison staff lacked training to identify Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD), risking physiological collapse and death for individuals subjected to prolonged restraint.
View full coroner's concerns
From about 11.30 pm on 31 October 2023 until moments before his death Mr Tarrant was displaying classic signs of Acute Behavioural Disturbance (“ABD”), which was formerly referred to as ‘Excited Delirium’. ABD is a well-known condition throughout the World. People suffering ABD can display a number of symptoms including apparent psychosis, repetitive shouting, random violence against people or objects, they tend to disrobe, be impervious to pain, demonstrate abnormal strength. They engage in bizarre behaviour and cannot be reasoned with. Expert evidence was given by Dr , a Consultant in Emergency Medicine and an acknowledged expert on restrain and ABD (who has been engaged by both eh Scottish Prison Service and HMPPS to advise in relation to these matters). Dr stated that Mr Tarrant’s presentation made it obvious that he was suffering ABD and that anybody who had been trained to spot the signs of it would have come to that conclusion within minutes of seeing him. People in a state of ABD are at risk of physiological collapse and death. It is believed that they become exhausted, acidotic, hyperthermic, hyperkaliaemic and hypoxic to the point at which they are unable to compensate by hyperventilating. The risk of death is particularly acute where a person suffering ABD is subjected to prolonged restraint because it increases their level of exertion (thereby exacerbating acidosis and hypoxia) and restricts the airway, chest and/or diaphragmatic movement. Dr expressed dismay that, in 2023, neither healthcare staff nor Prison staff had any training in respect of ABD and, as a result, appeared to have no idea that Mr Tarrant might be suffering from it. This is despite the fact that Prison Service Order 1600 (2005), written nearly two decades before, states in section 3 that:
Responses
Action Planned
HMPPS is consulting with clinical experts to develop and issue new written guidance for staff on recognising signs of Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD). This guidance aims to ensure officers identify potential medical emergencies and escalate concerns appropriately, in line with updated NHS England Use of Force frameworks. (AI summary)
HMPPS is consulting with clinical experts to develop and issue new written guidance for staff on recognising signs of Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD). This guidance aims to ensure officers identify potential medical emergencies and escalate concerns appropriately, in line with updated NHS England Use of Force frameworks. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr. Matthewson, REGULATION 28 REPORT TO PREVENT FUTURE DEATHS: MR JOSHUA YEMI TARRANT Thank you for your Regulation 28 report of 29 January 2026, addressed to the Governor of HMP Elmley. I am responding on behalf of HMPPS as the Interim Director General of Operations for HMPPS. I know that you will share a copy of this reply with Mr. Tarrant’s family and would like to express my condolences for their loss. Every death in custody is a tragedy and the safety of those in our care is my absolute priority. You have raised an important concern regarding the risks associated with Acute Behavioural Disturbance (ABD), specifically regarding local training and operational awareness of this. In the period following the inquest, HMPPS has taken active steps to ensure staff are better supported in recognising and responding to behavioural and physiological indicators associated with ABD. We are currently consulting with , whose clinical expertise is informing written guidance that will be issued to staff. This guidance is designed to equip officers with a clearer understanding of what signs may indicate ABD, while emphasising that the diagnosis and response to ABD rests solely with healthcare professionals. The intention is to ensure officers recognise potential medical emergencies quickly and escalate concerns appropriately.
During any use of force (UoF) incident, healthcare attendance is already mandatory. Once requested, healthcare staff must attend and remain for the duration of the incident. Their role is to actively monitor the individual, provide real-time clinical assessment, and advise staff on any concerns that may arise. NHS England has recently updated its UoF framework, strengthening expectations of healthcare staff and providing explicit guidance around indicators of ABD. This revised framework offers clearer boundaries and ensures that all staff involved in UoF events share a consistent approach to managing risk, including the risk of ABD. Thank you again for bringing your concerns to my attention. I trust that this response provides assurance that action is being taken to address this matter.
During any use of force (UoF) incident, healthcare attendance is already mandatory. Once requested, healthcare staff must attend and remain for the duration of the incident. Their role is to actively monitor the individual, provide real-time clinical assessment, and advise staff on any concerns that may arise. NHS England has recently updated its UoF framework, strengthening expectations of healthcare staff and providing explicit guidance around indicators of ABD. This revised framework offers clearer boundaries and ensures that all staff involved in UoF events share a consistent approach to managing risk, including the risk of ABD. Thank you again for bringing your concerns to my attention. I trust that this response provides assurance that action is being taken to address this matter.
Sent To
- HMP Elmley
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
6 Apr 2026
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 13 November 2023 the Area Coroner for Mid Kent & Medway commenced an investigation into the death of Josh Yemi Tarrant who died, aged 34, on 1 November 2023 at HMP Elmley (“the Prison”) on the Isle of Sheppey in Kent. The investigation concluded on 11 December 2025 at the end of an inquest conducted by me (sitting with a jury). The jury concluded that: “Josh Yemi Tarrant died as a result of Cocaine toxicity following a lengthy and challenging restraint. Josh was experiencing an acute behavioral disturbance which was not recognized by Healthcare staff. Healthcare’s failure to provide sufficient medical treatment at the earliest appropriate opportunity by calling an Ambulance by 23:29 was probably a significant contributing factor in Josh’s death. Josh’s death was contributed to by neglect.” The medical cause of death was: Ia. Cocaine intoxication II. Cardiac Hypertrophy and Exertion during Restraint
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Tarrant was born on 1 March 1989. On Saturday 28 October 2023 he was arrested and charged with robbery, actual bodily harm and criminal damage. He was held in police custody until Tuesday 31 October 2023 when he attended court and was remanded in custody until his next court hearing. He was taken to the Prison in the early evening. Despite being searched by prison staff Mr Tarrant somehow managed to smuggle cocaine into the prison, . He was initially calm, pleasant, complaint and engaged with staff. Mr Tarrant was taken to Houseblock 1 at around 7.30/8.00 pm and placed in a locked cell. The Officer Staff Grade (“OSG”) supervising Houseblock 1 during the night spoke to Mr Tarrant at about 10.30 pm when he remained calm and lucid. About an hour later his demeanour had completely changed. Mr Tarrant asked the OSG for help and said that he was hearing voices. He had taken his shirt off and was bare chested. He had probably ingested cocaine in the preceding hour. The OSG called for assistance and the Prison’s ‘Oscar 1’ (the most senior member of staff on site) attended with other officers. They entered Mr Tarrant’s cell to speak to him. He was standing up and looking out of the cell window. He did not respond and was speaking incoherently and repetitively, saying “help me, help me, help me” repeatedly. Mr Tarrant suddenly knocked a TV in his cell to the floor and ran out of his cell. He was restrained on the floor by a number of officers using Control and Restraint techniques. Mr Tarrant displayed unusual strength during this struggle and at one point lifted several officers off the ground as he got to his feet. The Oscar 1 called for the attendance of ‘Hotel 1’ (the nurse on duty at the Prison overnight) who attended after a short delay caused by the fact that she had no key to open locked gates. On arrival the Hotel 1 made little or no assessment of Mr Tarrant and, despite thinking he was having a psychotic episode, she did not declare a medical emergency (code blue) which would have triggered a 999 to the South East Coast Ambulance Service (“SECAmb”). The Oscar 1 decided that Mr Tarrant should be taken to the Prison’s healthcare unit where he could be kept under observation. The healthcare unit was aa short distance from Houseblock 1 and the journey on foot would normally take no more than a few minutes. However, Mr Tarrant was agitated and non-compliant and so the transfer took place under restraint During the next half an hour or so the officers were engaged in a extremely physically challenging transfer. Mr Tarrant was struggling throughout, allowing his body weight to drop and the officers had to stop form time to time to catch their breath and rotate staff. Throughout this episode Mr Tarrant was shouting incoherently and repetitively. He did not appear to know where he was (he kept asking for his mother) and displayed signs of severe distress. Officers finally managed to get Mr Tarrant into a observation cell in the healthcare unit. Once the door was locked he continued to be extremely distressed. He was shouting repeatedly and incoherently. He became violent and smashed the gate of his cell with his legs, arms and even his head. The force with which he did these things shocked some of the officers who witnessed it. Mr Tarrant also seemed to be oblivious to the pain that that he must have been experiencing. After about an hour, during which time Mr Tarrant did not seem to tire, he made a ligature out of his clothing material and put it around his neck and suspended himself. Officers entered the cell and removed the ligature. When closing the cell door, Mr Tarrant’s thumb was accidentally trapped between the metal gate and the door frame. Although this must have caused extreme pain, he did not seem to notice it. Mr Tarrant continued to be violent and the force of his blows eventually smashed the Perspex door cover. There were sharp pieces of broken Perspex both inside and outside the cell which officers were worried that Mr Tarrant might use to harm himself. They therefore relocated him into the next-door cell under restraint. Once again, Mr Tarrant struggled and the relocation was very physically challenging and took about 7/8 minutes to transport him no more than a few metres away. The officers exited the cell in a controlled way until there was one officer left. Whan the last officer made to exit the cell he sensed that something was wrong. He immediately re-entered the cell and saw that Mr Tarrant was unresponsive. He was not breathing and did not have a pulse. A Code Blue was called and an ambulance summoned at around 1.27 am on 1 November 2023. CPR was started immediately. Healthcare staff made a number of basic errors in providing CPR (failing to use the correct equipment, inserting an i-Gel in Mr Tarrant’s airway the wrong way around which blocked his airway). Although none of these failings ultimately caused or contributed to Mr Tarrant’s death the failures were shocking. In contrast, the Prison officers acquitted themselves very well and performed CPR to a high standard which was later complimented by paramedics. Paramedics arrived at the scene at 1.44 am and took over the management of Mr Tarrant’s airway form healthcare staff. They immediately noticed that the i-Gel had been placed incorrectly and rectified it. CPR was ultimately unsuccessful and Mr Tarrant was pronounced dead at 2.13 am on 1 November 2023.
Copies Sent To
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
South East Coast Ambulance Service
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.