Gwendoline Halfpenny

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2017-0353
Date of Report 5 December 2017
Coroner Andrew Haigh
Response Deadline est. 8 April 2018
All 1 response received · Deadline: 8 Apr 2018
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
County Hospital lacked surgical cover, and there was inconsistency in MEWS systems, duty policies, and equipment between hospitals within the same Trust.
View full coroner's concerns
would raise with you are as follows Soon after her arrival at County Hospital Mrs Halfpenny would have benefitted from surgical input: There was no surgical cover at County Hospital: Remote advice from RSUH is not the same as a surgical presence and wonder if there should be a mid-grade surgical doctor at County Hospital. Back in September 2016 when this death occurred the MEWS systems operated at County Hospital and RSUH differed: This has subsequently been remedied, However was told at the Inquest that there are still different duty policies and equipment at County Hospital than those at RSUH: The hospitals have been part of the same Trust for a considerable period now and wonder if there should be greater efforts to achieve consistency:
Responses
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust NHS / Health Body
30 Jan 2018
Action Planned
The Trust will re-share and re-communicate the SOP regarding consultant referrals to all staff. A Deputy Medical Director has been appointed with specific responsibility for County Hospital to speed up resolution of any remaining issues. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Haigh Gwendoline HALFPENNY Further to my letter dated 18 December 2017 , am pleased to provide a response to your report under paragraph of Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 f the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013, addressing your concerns surrounding the death of Gwendoline Halfpenny: Recorded Circumstances of the Death On September 2016 Mrs Halfpenny fell and broke her left arm. Treatment included codeine. On September 2016 she was admitted to County Hospital with bowel problems_ A decision was made for her to be transferred to the Royal Stoke University Hospital but no bed was available there until the afternoon of 8 September: Her condition deteriorated and at about 6.00am on 9 September she underwent major surgery. She did not recover and died at the hospital on 13 September 2016. Concerns During the course of the inquest you felt that evidence revealed matters giving rise for concern. In your opinion, matters for concern are as follows: Soon after her arrival at County Hospital Halfpenny would have benefitted from surgical input. There was no surgical cover at County Hospital. Remote advice from RSUH is not the same as a surgical presence and wonder if there should be a mid-grade surgical doctor at County Hospital. ti Tdosabaent COMMITTED Mrs

22- 2 Back in September 2016 when this death occurred the MEWS systems operated at County Hospital and RSUH differently. This has subsequently been remedied. However; was told at inquest that there are still different policies and equipment at County Hospital than those at RSUH: The hospitals have been part of the same Trust for considerable period now and wonder if there should be greater efforts to achieve consistency. You reported this matter under Paragraph 7, Schedule 5 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and Regulations 28 and 29 of the Coroners (Investigations) Regulations 2013. Action Taken The University Hospital of North Midlands NHS Trust has taken the issues highlighted during the inquest seriously and indeed, am grateful to you for raising potential for areas of improvement. At the time of the integration of UHNS and MFST and the re-modelling of services following the closure of MFST, the University Hospitals of North Midlands undertook substantial amount of work to ensure that services were reviewed and realigned to those sites more suitable to provide the best environment, As a result of this, with effect from 9 February 2015 there were to be no in- patient services at the County Hospital under the care of general surgery (including gastro- intestinal (GI) , breast and vascular surgery). However; day case surgeries under other specialities continue to provide a service from this site, so senior surgeons are available. In February 2015 a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) to address the surgical referral system was introduced and provides the following: Whilst consultant surgeons will no longer have County Hospital as their main base site there will be consultant Gl and urology surgeons on site daily Monday to Friday with vascular and breast surgeons on site up to 4 days a week b Efforts will be made to see non-urgent in-patient referrals on the same that are received. Referring clinicians are able to find out which consultant is on-site and where are via contacting extension 4541; following this, referrers will be asked to make verbal contact with the on-site consultant and follow this up with a written referral In light of the concerns that you have raised, this SOP will be re-shared and re-communicated to all staff via our daily and weekly communications_ 2 As outlined above, on integrating what were two separate hospitals, much work was undertaken to standardise and formalise processes and polices as far as possible with the assistance of external agencies. Nevertheless, it is recognised that this is an on-going process. It should also be noted that County Hospital and Royal Stoke University Hospital have very different surgical functions so efforts regarding consistency need to be balanced against these functions taking to account the available funds til Taocaitaery] Lnrnc) Iut Dktl COMMITTED the day they they

-3- We have now appointed a Deputy Medical Director with specific responsibility for County Hospital and it is hoped that this will speed up any remaining issues sincerely hope that this report provides you with assurance that the University Hospital of North Midlands NHS Trust has taken the matters arising from the inquest touching upon the death of Gwendoline Hafpenny seriously: The Trust strives to provide a high standard of care to all patients and am grateful to you for raising these matters on this occasion and am grateful for the subsequent opportunity for us to review our processes. understand that Mrs Halfpenny was a volunteer at what was Mid Staffs NHS Foundation Trust and my sincere condolences are extended to the family at this very difficult time and my apologies are also heartfelt as Mrs Halfpenny didn't receive the standard of care and dignity at the end of her life that she deserved: Should you wish to discuss any aspect of this report further, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.
Sent To
  • University Hospitals North Midlands NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 8 Apr 2018
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 25 August 2017 accepted the transfer from the North Staffordshire Coroner of an investigation into the death of Gwendoline Edith Halfpenny aged 67 years. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 28 November 2017_ The conclusion of the inquest was 'bowel condition of uncertain cause (possibly medication induced) with acute deterioration unable to be effectively treated' .
Circumstances of the Death
On September 2016 Mrs Halfpenny fell and broke her left arm: Treatment included codeine_ On 6 September she was admitted to County Hospital with bowel problems_ A decision was made for her to be transferred to the Royal Stoke University Hospital but no bed was available there until the afternoon of 8 September. Her condition deteriorated and at about 6.0Oam on 9 September she underwent major surgery_ She did not recover and died at the hospital on 13 September.
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the to take such action:
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Improve status, training, and qualifications of clinical coding staff for data accuracy
Bristol Heart Inquiry
Staff training and development Inconsistent Healthcare Data Infrastructure
Training for IPC professionals engineers and clinicians
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Staff training and development
Autism spectrum disorder police training
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent training on online activity assessment
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Neurodiversity training for Prevent practitioners
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Balancing vulnerability with professional curiosity
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Sharing information about closed Prevent referrals
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent Supervisor training on closure decisions
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development
Prevent referral training for organisations
Southport Inquiry
Staff training and development

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.