Gillian O’Keefe
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2017-0233
Community health care and emergency services related deaths
Hospital Death (Clinical Procedures and medical management) related deaths
Mental Health related deaths
All 3 responses received
· Deadline: 23 Nov 2017
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
The patient was illogically discharged from mental health care for "non-engagement" despite acute deterioration, without a multidisciplinary meeting or follow-up procedure for GP concerns. The family also faced barriers in sharing critical information with professionals.
View full coroner's concerns
_ (1) That the decision to discharge Mrs O'Keeffe 'for non-engagement' from the local Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust care in January 201-appeared illogical when it was likely, having regard to the facts, that she was in greatest need of their help: she was a service user of long standing, she had an acute deterioration in her mental state in March 2016,that there had been concerns raised by her family in October 2016 that no professionals had been able to make visual contact with her since October 2016.
(2) In view of her history and the inability of the Trust or GP surgery to make contact with Mrs O'Keeffe it was highly unlikely that she would self-refer_ (3) There was no pre-discharge multidisciplinary meeting to include and inform the GP before discharge nor attempt to ensure that there was a seamless transition to the GP surgery.
(4) Evidence was given at the inquest that there was no procedure or policy in place at the Trust to follow up GP concerns or referrals particularly where there was likely to be a degree of urgency.
(5) There appeared no easy or appropriate way that the family were able to share information and their concerns about OKeeffe's mental health with the professional team, consequently, notwithstanding the family's continual and concerted attempts t0 notify Mrs Q'Keeffe's care co-ordinator; they felt that the_ Mrs from and Mrs professionals were unaware of the parlous state 0f Mrs O Keeffe's mental health and the family's serious concerns
(2) In view of her history and the inability of the Trust or GP surgery to make contact with Mrs O'Keeffe it was highly unlikely that she would self-refer_ (3) There was no pre-discharge multidisciplinary meeting to include and inform the GP before discharge nor attempt to ensure that there was a seamless transition to the GP surgery.
(4) Evidence was given at the inquest that there was no procedure or policy in place at the Trust to follow up GP concerns or referrals particularly where there was likely to be a degree of urgency.
(5) There appeared no easy or appropriate way that the family were able to share information and their concerns about OKeeffe's mental health with the professional team, consequently, notwithstanding the family's continual and concerted attempts t0 notify Mrs Q'Keeffe's care co-ordinator; they felt that the_ Mrs from and Mrs professionals were unaware of the parlous state 0f Mrs O Keeffe's mental health and the family's serious concerns
Responses
Action Planned
The Clinical Director is scoping a quality improvement project focusing on family/carer engagement and primary care liaison. A learning event is being organized to share actions and promote reflection. The trust is committed to triangle of care principles and is about to undertake the next round of self-assessments. (AI summary)
The Clinical Director is scoping a quality improvement project focusing on family/carer engagement and primary care liaison. A learning event is being organized to share actions and promote reflection. The trust is committed to triangle of care principles and is about to undertake the next round of self-assessments. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Ms Hodes Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths am writing to you following receipt of the Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths dated 28th September 2017 regarding the sad death of Mrs Gillian OKeefe as a result of an overdose of medication: You have requested South West London and St Georges Mental Health NHS Trust respond to five matters of concern that you have detailed in your correspondence_ In order to examine all of the concerns meeting was convened on October 2017 by] Associate Director of Governance and Risk, with Clinical Director of the Community, and Head of Nursing and Quality for the Community Adult Services The meeting reviewed the details of the case and whether there were missed opportunities, as well as the possibility of gaps in our services with regard to care and treatment that may have prevented Mrs O'Keefe's death_ have responded to each of your concerns as were raised in your correspondence: Chief Executive, David Bradley Chairman, Peter Molyneux Respectful Open Collaborative Mh Compassionate Consistent 31st they
NHS] South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust
1) That the decision to discharge Mrs O'Keeffe 'for non-engagement' from the local Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust care in January 2017 appeared illogical when it was likely, having regard to the facts, that she was in greatest need of their help: she was a service user of long standing; she had an acute deterioration in her mental state in March 2016, that there had been concerns raised by her family in October 2016 and that no professionals had been able to make visual contact with her since October 2016. The decision to discharge was based on the following: Mrs O'Keefe had never expressed suicidal thoughts nor abused alcohol or taken illicit drugs the GP confirmed that Mrs OKeefe had picked up a prescription on 6th of January (4 days before the decision to discharge) the Care Co-ordinator noted that Mrs OKeefe appeared stable in her mental state when last seen on November and that she had reasonable self-care the Care Co-ordinator had not noticed any hypomanic symptoms outside of some emails Mrs O'Keefe sent to Members of Parliament the risk to Mrs O'Keefe and to others was assessed as low_ It is stated in your correspondence that no professionals had been able to make visual contact with Mrs 0'Keefe since October 2016. This is incorrect as visual contact was made with Mrs O'Keefe on November 2016 by the Care Co- ordinator who recorded that she appeared stable in mental state. We have provided rationale for the decision to discharge but also acknowledge that more engagement should have taken place with stakeholders prior to Mrs OKeefe's discharge. Since this incident; our Clinical Disengagement/Did Not Attend Policy has been updated: The updated version is more prescriptive with regards to what actions need to be taken before patient can be discharged and this includes engagement with the GP and inclusion of the GP in the decision to discharge Adherence to this policy is audited through our clinical audit programme.
2) In view of her history and the inability of the Trust or GP surgery to make contact with Mrs OKeeffe it was highly unlikely that she would self-refer: The Trust agrees with this statement. Attempts had been made to engage Mrs OKeeffe by telephone and through home visits. The team were of the opinion that her risk to self and others was low (although they acknowledged she was vulnerable)_ The discharge summary was sent to Mrs O'Keefe's GP, with the request Chief Executive, David Bradley Chairman, Peter Molyneux Respectful Open Collaborative Compassionate Consistent 22nd 22nd key
WHS South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust that re-refer the patient if it was required. However, crisis plan including relapse indicators was not sent to the GP or Mrs O'Keefe on discharge, nor was there liaison with the family at the point of discharge. The importance of sending the Trust approved template for a crisis plan to GPs will be re-enforced to staff through team and local governance meetings and via the Trust's dissemination of learning mechanisms such as the monthly bulletin, etc. This will again form part of the clinical audit cycle. The importance of family Iiaison and engagement forms part of our triangle of care programme. This programme is just about to start its round of 'self-assessments' and with the community services this learning will be cascaded through this process.
3) There was no pre-discharge multidisciplinary meeting to include and inform the GP before discharge nor attempt to ensure that there was a seamless transition to the GP surgery: Mrs OKeefe did not attend the CPA (Care Programme Approach) meeting on 10th of January 2017 . The Consultant Psychiatrist and Care Co-ordinator reviewed the care and treatment in her absence The Care Co-ordinator had made several attempts by telephone and home visits to contact Mrs O'Keefe. The care plan documented that the GP should continue the prescription of Quetiapine and should follow up with Mrs OKeefe and re-refer her if required. A letter outlining the care plan was sent to the GP There is no evidence that the GP was invited to this meeting: The Trust recognises that the decision to discharge would have benefitted from an early discussion and review between the RST and the GP prior to a formal discharge letter being sent out: The Trust's revised Clinical DisengagementIDid Not Attend Policy states that the team should liaise with the GP and invite them to be involved in the decision to discharge the patient The importance of involving the GP in the decision to discharge will be re-enforced to staff through team and local governance meetings and via the Trusts dissemination of learning mechanisms such as the monthly bulletin, etc. The clinical audit cycle will reinforce the importance of this being in place.
4) Evidence was given at the inquest that there was no procedure or policy in place at the Trust to follow up on GP concerns or referrals particularly where there was likely to be degree of urgency Chief Executive, David Bradley Chairman, Peter Molyneux Respectful Open Collaborative Ih Compassionate Consistent they
NHS] South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust The GP raised a concern with the Trust Consultant after a GP Liaison meeting at the Practice in February 2017 . The GP was advised to re-refer the patient in writing: The Trust understands that the GP drafted referral letter but that this was not sent to the Trust at the time_ The referral was never sent by the GP but this concern highlights the need for some clear guidance for GPs regarding concerns may have The Trust is in the process of formalising this with the lead CCG GP involvement: It will be shared with GP colleagues once it has been signed off. It is also worth noting that the Trust is in the process of developing a primary care liaison team with the objective of improving communication between GPs and the Trust.
5) There appeared no easy or appropriate way that the family were able to share information and their concerns about Mrs O'Keeffe's mental health with the professional team, consequently, notwithstanding the family's continual and concerted attempts to notify Mrs O'Keeffe's care coordinator; felt that the professionals were unaware of the parlous state of Mrs O Keeffe's mental health and the family's serious concerns The occasions when the team were contacted by the family and their responses are detailed below: October 2016: Concerns were raised by Mrs O'Keefe's sister. In response to these concerns, the Care Co-ordinator made an unannounced visit to Mrs O'Keefe on the same day but she was not at home. The Care Co-ordinator attempted to contact Mrs O'Keefe's sister but was unable to speak with her so left a message The Care Co-ordinator also contacted the GP surgery who confirmed that Mrs OKeefe had collected her monthly prescription on October 2016. 25th October 2016: The Care Co-ordinator made another unannounced visit but Mrs O'Keefe was not at home_ The Care Co-ordinator made telephone contact with Mrs O'Keefe who explained she was in cafe and planning to visit her mum in Lincolnshire and that she would meet the care Co-ordinator at the team base on October 2016. 28th October 2016; Mrs O'Keefe did not attend the appointment: The Care Co- ordinator made contact with her by telephone and Mrs O'Keefe explained she was still in Lincolnshire The Care Co-ordinator left a message on Mrs OKeefe's sister's telephone to update her and confirm whether she saw her sister at their mum's home_ Chief Executive, David Bradley Chairman, Peter Molyneux Respectful Open Collaborative hl Compassionate Consistent they they 24th 17th 28th
NHS] South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust The Trust was disappointed to learn that the family felt that there wasn't an easy way to share information and their concerns about Mrs O'Keefe with the team: The Clinical Director is currently scoping a quality improvement project in relation to Care Programme Approach (CPA) focussing on the engagement of familieslcarers and liaison with primary care_ In addition to this the Head of Nursing for the service is organising learning event so that each of the actions identified in the plan can be shared with the team, with the event providing an opportunity for reflection and learning: As referred to earlier the trust is also committed to the triangle of care principles and is just about to undertake the next round of self-assessments. Enclosed with this letter is a plan detailing the actions taken already or the proposed actions to be taken along with timetable for action_ Our deepest sympathies are extended to the family and friends of Mrs OKeefe. The conclusion that we have reached indicates that there is more work to be done with our teams regarding communication with familieslcarers and the inclusion of key stakeholders with regard to decisions around discharge.
NHS] South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust
1) That the decision to discharge Mrs O'Keeffe 'for non-engagement' from the local Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust care in January 2017 appeared illogical when it was likely, having regard to the facts, that she was in greatest need of their help: she was a service user of long standing; she had an acute deterioration in her mental state in March 2016, that there had been concerns raised by her family in October 2016 and that no professionals had been able to make visual contact with her since October 2016. The decision to discharge was based on the following: Mrs O'Keefe had never expressed suicidal thoughts nor abused alcohol or taken illicit drugs the GP confirmed that Mrs OKeefe had picked up a prescription on 6th of January (4 days before the decision to discharge) the Care Co-ordinator noted that Mrs OKeefe appeared stable in her mental state when last seen on November and that she had reasonable self-care the Care Co-ordinator had not noticed any hypomanic symptoms outside of some emails Mrs O'Keefe sent to Members of Parliament the risk to Mrs O'Keefe and to others was assessed as low_ It is stated in your correspondence that no professionals had been able to make visual contact with Mrs 0'Keefe since October 2016. This is incorrect as visual contact was made with Mrs O'Keefe on November 2016 by the Care Co- ordinator who recorded that she appeared stable in mental state. We have provided rationale for the decision to discharge but also acknowledge that more engagement should have taken place with stakeholders prior to Mrs OKeefe's discharge. Since this incident; our Clinical Disengagement/Did Not Attend Policy has been updated: The updated version is more prescriptive with regards to what actions need to be taken before patient can be discharged and this includes engagement with the GP and inclusion of the GP in the decision to discharge Adherence to this policy is audited through our clinical audit programme.
2) In view of her history and the inability of the Trust or GP surgery to make contact with Mrs OKeeffe it was highly unlikely that she would self-refer: The Trust agrees with this statement. Attempts had been made to engage Mrs OKeeffe by telephone and through home visits. The team were of the opinion that her risk to self and others was low (although they acknowledged she was vulnerable)_ The discharge summary was sent to Mrs O'Keefe's GP, with the request Chief Executive, David Bradley Chairman, Peter Molyneux Respectful Open Collaborative Compassionate Consistent 22nd 22nd key
WHS South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust that re-refer the patient if it was required. However, crisis plan including relapse indicators was not sent to the GP or Mrs O'Keefe on discharge, nor was there liaison with the family at the point of discharge. The importance of sending the Trust approved template for a crisis plan to GPs will be re-enforced to staff through team and local governance meetings and via the Trust's dissemination of learning mechanisms such as the monthly bulletin, etc. This will again form part of the clinical audit cycle. The importance of family Iiaison and engagement forms part of our triangle of care programme. This programme is just about to start its round of 'self-assessments' and with the community services this learning will be cascaded through this process.
3) There was no pre-discharge multidisciplinary meeting to include and inform the GP before discharge nor attempt to ensure that there was a seamless transition to the GP surgery: Mrs OKeefe did not attend the CPA (Care Programme Approach) meeting on 10th of January 2017 . The Consultant Psychiatrist and Care Co-ordinator reviewed the care and treatment in her absence The Care Co-ordinator had made several attempts by telephone and home visits to contact Mrs O'Keefe. The care plan documented that the GP should continue the prescription of Quetiapine and should follow up with Mrs OKeefe and re-refer her if required. A letter outlining the care plan was sent to the GP There is no evidence that the GP was invited to this meeting: The Trust recognises that the decision to discharge would have benefitted from an early discussion and review between the RST and the GP prior to a formal discharge letter being sent out: The Trust's revised Clinical DisengagementIDid Not Attend Policy states that the team should liaise with the GP and invite them to be involved in the decision to discharge the patient The importance of involving the GP in the decision to discharge will be re-enforced to staff through team and local governance meetings and via the Trusts dissemination of learning mechanisms such as the monthly bulletin, etc. The clinical audit cycle will reinforce the importance of this being in place.
4) Evidence was given at the inquest that there was no procedure or policy in place at the Trust to follow up on GP concerns or referrals particularly where there was likely to be degree of urgency Chief Executive, David Bradley Chairman, Peter Molyneux Respectful Open Collaborative Ih Compassionate Consistent they
NHS] South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust The GP raised a concern with the Trust Consultant after a GP Liaison meeting at the Practice in February 2017 . The GP was advised to re-refer the patient in writing: The Trust understands that the GP drafted referral letter but that this was not sent to the Trust at the time_ The referral was never sent by the GP but this concern highlights the need for some clear guidance for GPs regarding concerns may have The Trust is in the process of formalising this with the lead CCG GP involvement: It will be shared with GP colleagues once it has been signed off. It is also worth noting that the Trust is in the process of developing a primary care liaison team with the objective of improving communication between GPs and the Trust.
5) There appeared no easy or appropriate way that the family were able to share information and their concerns about Mrs O'Keeffe's mental health with the professional team, consequently, notwithstanding the family's continual and concerted attempts to notify Mrs O'Keeffe's care coordinator; felt that the professionals were unaware of the parlous state of Mrs O Keeffe's mental health and the family's serious concerns The occasions when the team were contacted by the family and their responses are detailed below: October 2016: Concerns were raised by Mrs O'Keefe's sister. In response to these concerns, the Care Co-ordinator made an unannounced visit to Mrs O'Keefe on the same day but she was not at home. The Care Co-ordinator attempted to contact Mrs O'Keefe's sister but was unable to speak with her so left a message The Care Co-ordinator also contacted the GP surgery who confirmed that Mrs OKeefe had collected her monthly prescription on October 2016. 25th October 2016: The Care Co-ordinator made another unannounced visit but Mrs O'Keefe was not at home_ The Care Co-ordinator made telephone contact with Mrs O'Keefe who explained she was in cafe and planning to visit her mum in Lincolnshire and that she would meet the care Co-ordinator at the team base on October 2016. 28th October 2016; Mrs O'Keefe did not attend the appointment: The Care Co- ordinator made contact with her by telephone and Mrs O'Keefe explained she was still in Lincolnshire The Care Co-ordinator left a message on Mrs OKeefe's sister's telephone to update her and confirm whether she saw her sister at their mum's home_ Chief Executive, David Bradley Chairman, Peter Molyneux Respectful Open Collaborative hl Compassionate Consistent they they 24th 17th 28th
NHS] South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust The Trust was disappointed to learn that the family felt that there wasn't an easy way to share information and their concerns about Mrs O'Keefe with the team: The Clinical Director is currently scoping a quality improvement project in relation to Care Programme Approach (CPA) focussing on the engagement of familieslcarers and liaison with primary care_ In addition to this the Head of Nursing for the service is organising learning event so that each of the actions identified in the plan can be shared with the team, with the event providing an opportunity for reflection and learning: As referred to earlier the trust is also committed to the triangle of care principles and is just about to undertake the next round of self-assessments. Enclosed with this letter is a plan detailing the actions taken already or the proposed actions to be taken along with timetable for action_ Our deepest sympathies are extended to the family and friends of Mrs OKeefe. The conclusion that we have reached indicates that there is more work to be done with our teams regarding communication with familieslcarers and the inclusion of key stakeholders with regard to decisions around discharge.
Action Planned
The Trust is working to produce guidance for GPs on raising concerns and referrals and is looking to strengthen family and carer engagement and primary care liaison. The CCG will review the Trust’s action plan. (AI summary)
The Trust is working to produce guidance for GPs on raising concerns and referrals and is looking to strengthen family and carer engagement and primary care liaison. The CCG will review the Trust’s action plan. (AI summary)
View full response
From Jackie Doyle-Price MP Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Care and Mental Health Department of Health Richmond House 79 Whitehall London SWIA 2NS Angela Hodes 020 7210 4850 HM Assistant Coroner Inner West London 65 Horseferry Road LONDON SWIP 2ED Our reference: PFD-1100360 23rd November 2017 Jeak 4eoks Thank you for your Report dated 28 September to the Secretary of State for Health about the death of Mrs Gillian O Keeffe. I am responding as mental health sits within my portfolio. I was very saddened to read of the regrettable circumstances surrounding Mrs O Keeffe's death. Please pass my condolences to her family and loved ones. [ appreciate this must be a very difficult time for them: Your Report details concerns around the decision to discharge Mrs O Keeffe from mental health services; the lack of communication with Mrs O Keeffe's GP; the difficulties faced by the family in making their concerns known to mental health services; and the absence of policies in place at the South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust to follow up the GP's subsequent concerns. The matters raised are operational and relate to the South West London St George's Mental Health NHS Trust. However; it is important to make clear the national policy expectations in relation to the issues you have raised. The Mental Health Act 1983 Code of Practice; whilst statutory guidance for providers of services under the Act should be observed as best practice by all commissioners and providers of services to people who may become subject to the Act: We revised the Code of Practice in 2015 and set out guiding principles to improve the care for patients. The principles include mental health providers involving patients ' carers and families in decisions about their care. The Code of Practice also makes it clear that we expect multi-disciplinary teams involved in care being
planning and discharge to include all relevant professionals and agencies which may be involved in a person'$ care_ My officials have made enquiries and [ am encouraged that the Trust is taking action to respond to these concerns in your Report; as well as those raised by the in addition to learning identified through its own investigations into Mrs O Keeffe'$ care and treatment _ While the Trust has explained the rationale for the decision to discharge Mrs O'Keeffe from its services, it acknowledges that more engagement should have taken place with stakeholders in reaching this decision: Learning lessons where have gone wrong is essential to ensuring the NHS provides safe, high quality care. You will know from the response provided by the Trust on 21 November that the Trust has identified actions to take in response to the concerns you have raised. This includes updating the Trust'$ clinical disengagement/did not attend policy to be more prescriptive in the actions to take and engagement with stakeholders when taking & decision to discharge a patient: The Trust advises that it will take action through staff learning mechanisms to promote the importance of the involvement of GPs in pre-discharge multi- disciplinary meetings. Further; the Trust is working to produce guidance for GPs in how can raise concerns and referrals and is looking to strengthen the engagement of families and carers and liaison with primary care. My officials also made enquiries with the Wandsworth Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and [ understand the CCG will review the Trust'$ action plan for addressing the concerns you have raised Wandsworth CCG advises that it is satisfied that the GP Practice took action to raise concerns about Mrs O Keeffe through the correct processes (i.e-, the GP quarterly Iiaison meeting with the Trust). However; when considering learning points from this case, I am informed that the CCG and Practice have identified other processes and routes the Practice could have used to raise concerns_ These include the GP Alert System that enables GP practices and other health professionals to raise concerns about patient care directly to the CCG, and the GP clinical lead for the Trust; who can raise concerns directly at clinical review meetings within the Trust; Iam advised that a learning event will be undertaken to review the system-wide issues that the case has identified and to ensure that the system is able to allow family, key things key they
Department of Health families easier access to health professionals should need to raise care issues about their relatives: I hope this information provides assurance that there are processes available to families ad GPs to raise concerns about patient care in such circumstances. Such processes are the responsibility of individual NHS trusts and you have taken the correct course of action in addressing your concerns to the South West London & St George' s Mental Health NHS Trust; and I hope the Trust'$ response is helpful . Thank you for bringing the circumstances of Mrs O Keeffe's death to our attention: CUuQ JACKIE DOYLE-PRICE they -
planning and discharge to include all relevant professionals and agencies which may be involved in a person'$ care_ My officials have made enquiries and [ am encouraged that the Trust is taking action to respond to these concerns in your Report; as well as those raised by the in addition to learning identified through its own investigations into Mrs O Keeffe'$ care and treatment _ While the Trust has explained the rationale for the decision to discharge Mrs O'Keeffe from its services, it acknowledges that more engagement should have taken place with stakeholders in reaching this decision: Learning lessons where have gone wrong is essential to ensuring the NHS provides safe, high quality care. You will know from the response provided by the Trust on 21 November that the Trust has identified actions to take in response to the concerns you have raised. This includes updating the Trust'$ clinical disengagement/did not attend policy to be more prescriptive in the actions to take and engagement with stakeholders when taking & decision to discharge a patient: The Trust advises that it will take action through staff learning mechanisms to promote the importance of the involvement of GPs in pre-discharge multi- disciplinary meetings. Further; the Trust is working to produce guidance for GPs in how can raise concerns and referrals and is looking to strengthen the engagement of families and carers and liaison with primary care. My officials also made enquiries with the Wandsworth Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) and [ understand the CCG will review the Trust'$ action plan for addressing the concerns you have raised Wandsworth CCG advises that it is satisfied that the GP Practice took action to raise concerns about Mrs O Keeffe through the correct processes (i.e-, the GP quarterly Iiaison meeting with the Trust). However; when considering learning points from this case, I am informed that the CCG and Practice have identified other processes and routes the Practice could have used to raise concerns_ These include the GP Alert System that enables GP practices and other health professionals to raise concerns about patient care directly to the CCG, and the GP clinical lead for the Trust; who can raise concerns directly at clinical review meetings within the Trust; Iam advised that a learning event will be undertaken to review the system-wide issues that the case has identified and to ensure that the system is able to allow family, key things key they
Department of Health families easier access to health professionals should need to raise care issues about their relatives: I hope this information provides assurance that there are processes available to families ad GPs to raise concerns about patient care in such circumstances. Such processes are the responsibility of individual NHS trusts and you have taken the correct course of action in addressing your concerns to the South West London & St George' s Mental Health NHS Trust; and I hope the Trust'$ response is helpful . Thank you for bringing the circumstances of Mrs O Keeffe's death to our attention: CUuQ JACKIE DOYLE-PRICE they -
Noted
Cricket Green Medical Practice acknowledges the coroner's report and confirms a Significant Event Analysis (SEA) was undertaken. They note actions the GP practice took and actions the CCG could have utilised. The CCG will review the Trust’s action plan and conduct a learning event. (AI summary)
Cricket Green Medical Practice acknowledges the coroner's report and confirms a Significant Event Analysis (SEA) was undertaken. They note actions the GP practice took and actions the CCG could have utilised. The CCG will review the Trust’s action plan and conduct a learning event. (AI summary)
View full response
CRICKET GREEN MEDICAL PRACTICE GP Registrar: Westminster Coroner's Court 11lh December 2017 FAO: Susan Lord (Clerk to HM Coroner) Inner West London Horseferry Road London SWIP 2ED Re: Gillian O'Keeffe DOB 31/05/1966 Coroners Report 1100360_ Thank you for your letter; sincerely apologise that you have had to contact us again regarding this enquiry: We sent out the original correspondence 2 weeks ago which unfortunately seems you have not received, have printed off the report again and enclosing with this letter: If you require any further information please do not hesitate to contact me direct on 020 8685 2345.
Sent To
- Cricket Green Medical Practice
- Department of Health and Social Care
- St George’s Mental NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses
3 of 3
56-Day Deadline
23 Nov 2017
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 24 MARCH 2017, an investigation was commenced into the death of GILLIAN OKEEFE, AGED 50 YEARS OLD investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 5 SEPTEMBER 2017 . The conclusions of the inquest were as follows: Medical cause of death: Quetiapine consumption How, when and where Mrs 0'Keeffe came by her death: On 19 March 2017 Mrs 0'Keefe was found dead in her home. She suffered from a schizoaffective disorder and had been prescribed Quetiapine. Attempts to invite her to re-engage with community mental health services had failed. The
The conclusion 0f the Coroner as t0 the death: Ilrs 0'Keeffe took her own life whilst the balance of her mind was disturbed
The conclusion 0f the Coroner as t0 the death: Ilrs 0'Keeffe took her own life whilst the balance of her mind was disturbed
Circumstances of the Death
Mrs O'Keeffe had a serious mental illness and was coded as a vulnerable adult on her notes at her local GP surgery_ Mrs O'Keeffe was under the care of the Mitcham Recovery and Support Team and was seen by them on a regular; often monthly basis, throughout 2014 and 2015; Her mental state deteriorated and she was referred to Merton Home Treatment team from March ~May 2016 and prescribed supervised antipsychotic medication: When her mental health appeared improved she was discharged back to the care of Merton Adult Mental Health Services (Wilson Hospital, Cranmer Road Mitcham) in May 2016 and allocated a new care co-ordinator. (iv) Mrs O'Keeffe was last seen at her GP practice, on 8 June 2016 for a medical check-up and at that time she felt well. (v) On 24 October 2016 Mrs O'Keeffe's sister raised concerns about her and an ambulance was sent to check on her She was not seen but reviewed by her care coordinator on 31 October 2016 and found to be stable in her mental state and confirmed her compliance with medication. (vi) Mrs O'Keefe did not respond to any appointments offered by the Merton Adult Mental Health Services in November; December or January and s0 she was discharged from the team due to non-engagement; she was offered to self-refer or ask her GP to refer her back if needed in the future (vii) Her sister gave evidence that the 'system' made it difficultl impossible for information from the family to be shared and acted on by Mrs O'Keeffe's medical team and therefore she did not consider that her sister was supported appropriately by the mental health team. (viii) O'Keefe's GP received the notice of her discharge in January 2017 , that Mrs OKeeffe had been returned to her care without any planning or prior notification to the GP (ix) The GP's surgery was unable to make contact with Mrs O'Keeffe in January or February 2017, notwithstanding that they had raised their concerns at a practice meeting with the CMHT, nothing had been done and on 15 March 2017 the GP wrote a referral to the CMHT as she remained concerned about Mrs O'Keeffe's summary discharge mental health services_
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you [ANDIOR your organisation] have the power to take such action.
Inquest Conclusion
Medical cause of death: Quetiapine consumption How, when and where Mrs 0'Keeffe came by her death: On 19 March 2017 Mrs 0'Keefe was found dead in her home. She suffered from a schizoaffective disorder and had been prescribed Quetiapine. Attempts to invite her to re-engage with community mental health services had failed. The
The conclusion 0f the Coroner as t0 the death: Ilrs 0'Keeffe took her own life whilst the balance of her mind was disturbed
The conclusion 0f the Coroner as t0 the death: Ilrs 0'Keeffe took her own life whilst the balance of her mind was disturbed
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Prevent discharge of hospitalised children with concerns until home is safe
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Require consultant or paediatrician permission for discharging children with protection concerns.
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Require documented future care plan for discharging children with protection concerns.
Laming Inquiry
Care and discharge planning
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.