Christopher Broom
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2016-0044
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Lack of adequate lighting at the harbour wall end and a single, hard-to-spot lifebelt created significant safety risks for visitors.
View full coroner's concerns
_ The two The first is that (here was only one lifebelt available. This was some distance from where Mr Broom was fishing and was difficult to spot Witnesses (hought a lifebelt may have helped Mr Broom (0 survive. The second is that there was no lighting at the end of (he harbour wall so that visilors lo the harbour at night could not judge where the wall ended and in addilion made the aforementioned lifebell almost invisible very
Sent To
- Square Sail
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
3 Apr 2016
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On the 3rd February 2016 at the Clty Hall in Truro conducted the inquest Into the death of a young man called Chrlstopher Tristan Broom:
Circumstances of the Death
The brief facts were (hat Christopher Broom , accompanied by his girlfriend, was fishing from (he harbour wall at Charlestown: It was about 1-
p.m. at night on the 6lh Seplember 2015. Sadly, and it was not quite clear how, he fell into the waler and drowned: He could not swim _
p.m. at night on the 6lh Seplember 2015. Sadly, and it was not quite clear how, he fell into the waler and drowned: He could not swim _
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent fulure dealhs and believe you, or your organisation has Ihe power t0 (ake such action_ Extra lifebelts positioned around the harbour. Adequate lighting to be installed.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Remove all spikes and inward-facing constructions from perimeter and radial fences
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Limit perimeter fencing height to a maximum of 2.2 metres
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Provide sufficient 1.1-metre wide gates in perimeter fences for emergency evacuation
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Paint and mark all emergency gates in fences with "Emergency Exit
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Keep all perimeter fence gates to pitch unlocked and open during matches
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Annually inspect all crush barriers for corrosion; repair or replace as needed
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.