Robert Hogg

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2015-0313
Date of Report 6 August 2015
Coroner Crispin Butler
Coroner Area Buckinghamshire
Response Deadline est. 1 October 2015
All 2 responses received · Deadline: 1 Oct 2015
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
NHS Pathways' toddler/child assessment tools are failing to identify very sick children, a persistent and unaddressed risk despite prior investigations.
View full coroner's concerns
_ (1) An Investigation Report (2014/13029) prepared by for South Central Ambulance Service (incident no: IR 4865) revealed three areas of concern: (2) The third area of concern stated specifically NHS Pathways toddlerlchild Pathways are not necessarily highlightingpicking up very sick children. This is not the first event relating to incidents involving toddlersichildren and this has been highlighted through our own Pathways Lead to NHS Pathways for investigation" (3) The evidence given by during the Inquest was that no changes have been made to the toddlerlchild pathways and that the third area of concern identified in the The Coroner" = Court, 29 Windsor End, Beaconstield, Buckinghamshire, HPO ZJJ Tel 01494 475505 Fax 01494 673760 boy clingy,

Tnvestigation Report is a continuing risk
Responses
Department of Health Central Government
10 Aug 2015
Noted
The Department of Health acknowledges the coroner's concerns and provides context about NHS Pathways and SCAS, deferring to the NHS Pathways response for specific actions. (AI summary)
View full response
From the Lord Prior of Brampton Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for NHS Productivity (Lords) Department of Health Mr C. Butler Richmond House Assistant Coroner 79 Whitehall London Coroners Service SWIA ZNS 29 Windsor End Tel: 020 7210 4850 Beaconsfield Buckinghamshire HP9 2JJ Ousbser 215 (k_ Thank you for your letter of 10 August 2015 to Dr Felicity Harvey following the inquest into the death of Robert [am responding as the Minister responsible for this policy area. I was extremely sorry to hear of Robert's death and wish to extend my sincerest condolences to his family: Your concerns in this case arise from the handling of an emergency call that was made by Robert'$ mother to the NHS 1ll service provided by the South Central Ambulance Service (SCAS) on the 21 April, following a deterioration in Robert's health: Following Robert'$ death, an investigation report; prepared by Suzanne Solera for SCAS,revealed the following area of concem: "NHS Pathways toddler/child Pathways are not necessarily highlighting/picking up very sick children This is not the first event relating to incidents involving toddlers/children and this has been highlighted through our own Pathways Lead to NHS Pathways for investigation Evidence at the inquest showed that no changes had been made to the toddler/child pathways and you are therefore concerned that this issue is a continuing risk: As in the majority of NHS 1ll services, SCAS uses NHS Pathways Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) to support safe assessment of calls received by the service. This system allows for sorting, Or of calls such that may receive an appropriate response. Hogg: triage, they

The Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC) is the national provider of information, data and IT systems for commissioners, analysts and clinicians in health and social care. HSCIC is an executive non- departmental body and is responsible for the NHS Pathways system; NHS Pathways has provided a response which I am enclosing: Iam grateful to for bringing the circumstances of Robert's death to my attention and hope that you find this reply helpful. 4 DAVID PRIOR public you
NHS Pathways NHS / Health Body
Disputed
NHS Pathways disputes the coroner's concerns, arguing that the system was used correctly and that no similar cases had been reported. They request the allegations be struck from the record and seek opportunity to answer directly in similar cases. (AI summary)
View full response
Regulation 28 Report to prevent future deaths – Robert Gordon John Hogg

NHS Pathways Response

NHS Pathways Overview

NHS Pathways is the provider of the Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) for six of the ten ambulance providers in England. In addition to this it is used in all NHS 111 sites. Use of this system is wrapped around by a comprehensive package of training and continuous quality assessments.

NHS Pathways clinical content, which comprises the hierarchical algorithmic questions presented to call takers, is continuously subject to review. Where there are grounds to amend the content NHS Pathways undertakes to make such amendments in good time and without increasing risk to patient assessment. It encourages sites to submit issues where they consider improvement could be made to the system. The NHS Pathways Clinical Author Team investigates these issues and makes any necessary changes. The changes within any particular timeframe are included in a single release. There are usually two releases per annum. This is because of the safety issues related to making patch updates without adequate testing or training.

Sequence of events

This case relates to calls handled by SCAS - the sequence of events is as follows:

The Incident Report and its Claims

The incident report referred to in the Coroner’s ruling (IR 4865) states:

“The Call Handler did a thorough assessment using the NHS Pathways and came to an appropriate disposition for what symptoms were being described.”

It is difficult to understand, therefore, any basis for the later statement:

“NHS Pathways toddler/child Pathways are not necessarily highlighting/picking up very sick children.”

Furthermore, the statement:

“This is not the first event relating to incidents involving toddlers/children and this has been highlighted through our own Pathways Lead to NHS Pathways for investigation.”

is in fact incorrect as no similar cases in this age category, toddler/child1 have been highlighted to NHS Pathways for investigation by SCAS.

NHS Pathways Safety Record

NHS Pathways takes patient safety extremely seriously. The system supports the safe triage of approximately 1 million calls per month in the NHS 111 environment. There are a handful of cases, across all ages, where there have been adverse incidents. Indeed an internal NHS England document, Learning from NHS 111 Related Serious Incidents – Childhood Sepsis, states:

“The rate of reporting of clinical Serious Incidents is approximately 1 in 250,000 calls answered.”

A search on the records by NHS 111 relating to childhood sepsis identified a total of twelve incidents in the 13 month period between March 2013 and May 2014, in a total of over 12 million calls assessed. The majority of these were related to operational matters outside of NHS Pathways clinical assessment of the child.

However as a learning system, and as a consequence of this document, NHS Pathways did amend the system, and is continuing to review the clinical content and architecture in regards to safe identification of cases of paediatric sepsis.

1 Toddler encompasses ages 1 to 5 years, Child refers to patients aged 5 to 16 years.

Specifically, NHS Pathways added advice to regularly check on un-well children overnight and enhanced the training materials.

Assessment and Sorting in this Case

From the timeline above, and as is detailed in Suzanne Solera’s report (IR 4865) the case was appropriately assessed at the time of the initial triage.

There was a failure to follow correct procedure in the later call logged at 11:42. This error is referred to in the report. Had the call been triaged, a different (higher) outcome may well have been reached if the patient had clinically deteriorated.

Speak to GP within 1 hour is an urgent primary care disposition in the NHS Pathways system. The reason for a “Speak to” rather than a “Contact” disposition is that the system determines that a high level of clinical expertise is required to determine the correct skill-set and timeframe required to respond to the patient’s needs at the time of the call.

Allegations

1. NHS Pathways toddler/child pathways are not necessarily highlighting/picking up very sick children.

There are no grounds for this claim either within the Incident Report submitted to the court, or by the weight of evidence of 12 cases, mainly associated with issues outside of the decision support system, in approximately 12 million calls handled in 2013-14.

2. This is not the first event relating to incidents involving toddlers/children and this has been highlighted through our own Pathways Lead to NHS Pathways for investigation. No similar related cases have been notified to NHS Pathways by SCAS.

Further Actions

1. Matters to be struck from the record

It should be considered that the allegations made be struck from the record as they are misleading and not an accurate representation of the facts as found by the investigation at site.

2. Seeking adjournment

NHS Pathways would seek that in similar cases, where NHS Pathways CDSS is alleged to be attributable, that they have adequate opportunity to be held accountable and answer directly to the Court. In this case we consider it a grave error if the patient’s family have been led to believe that the NHS Pathways system is in any way attributable for this, or any other similar death. Since the NHS Pathways system is publically owned, it is incumbent upon us to hold its leaders to account when required, but also to uphold its reputation where necessary.

3. Working with SCAS

NHS Pathways are liaising directly with SCAS to better understand why these allegations may have been made. From initial enquiries, it seems that the views expressed in court are not consistent with those of the senior clinical leadership of SCAS.
Sent To
  • Department of Health and Social Care
Response Status
Linked responses 2 of 1
56-Day Deadline 1 Oct 2015
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 25/04/2014 | commenced an Investigation into the death of Robert Gordon John Hogg, a aged 2 years The Investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 25/h June 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was narrative (see attached) The medical cause of death was recorded as: 'Ia) Acute Bacterial Bronchopneumonia Streptococcus Pneumoniae Infection Viral Upper Respiratory Tract Infection (Rhinovirus, Human Bocavirus were detected)
Circumstances of the Death
Robert Hogg was taken to the Bucks Urgent Care Centre; Stoke Mandeville Hospital on 16.04.14 by his parents with a cold and temperature; he was seen by medical staff and assessed under the NICE guideline to be in the Amber category_ He was administered antipyretics and was subsequently allowed home when his condition had been assessed in the Green category Roberts parents were advised to administer Nurofen; monitor him and bring him back if his condition worsened. Robert was off of his food over 19.04.14 20.04.14 eating very little, he was complaining of & stomach ache and grunting when he exhaled. Robert's parents gave him a laxative. He had a bowel movement and appeared to improve. On 21.04.14 Robert was lethargic, pale and his mother called 111 and an appointment was made for 13.24 at Bucks Urgent Care Centre;' Stoke Mandeville Hospital; While Robert and his family were in the waiting room, he became limp, pale and unresponsive: He was rushed into the Accident and Emergency Department at 13.43 where CPR was commenced: Robert's death was confirmed by_ on 21.04.14at 14.27
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you Department of Health have the power to take such action.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Healthcare provision under Protect Duty
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Urgent care pathways
Review procedures for patient dispatch to hospitals
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Urgent care pathways

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.