James McGeown
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2015-0506
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
An undulation in the road surface caused a loss of vehicle control at higher speeds, posing a significant risk to unsuspecting drivers.
View full coroner's concerns
In the circumstances it is my statutory to report to you: (1) / enclose a copy of the Collision Invesstigator's Report_prepared by your attention to paragraphs 6.13 and 8.6. has identified an "undulation" in the road surface. It is likely that this caused the "wobble" seen by the witness immediately prior to Mr McGeown losing control of his vehicle. In his evidence to the Court, that he had driven this stretch of road on several occassions as a consequence of this incident While travelling within the speed limit the_undulation causes drivers no concern At higher speeds (95mph) duty draw Isaid limit the undulation causes drivers no concern: At higher speeds (95mph), described the undulation as causing a loss of control that may have caused an unsuspecting driver to have a collision. (2) (3)
Sent To
- Worcestershire County Council
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
16 Sep 2015
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 20 March 2015 commenced an investigation into the death of James Gerard MCGEOWN then aged 46. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest on 22 July 2015. The conclusion of the inquest was road traffic collision the medical cause of death being 1a) multiple injuries
Circumstances of the Death
Mr McGeown was seen to overtake another vehicle_ He was described at travelling well in excess of the speed limit of 7Omph. Toxicology evidence revealed that he was also driving under the influence of alcohol The Collision Investigator found that Mr McGeown was not wearing a seat belt At the time Mr McGeown overtook the other car; his vehicle was seen to "wobble" this caused the vehicle to step towards the nearside_ In attempting to recover the situation Mr McGeown oversteered and collided with the central reservation, crossing over it and in to the opposing carriageway_
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe you have the power to take such action.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Revise signal sighting standard to explicitly consider signal readability
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Define additional time required for reading gantry-mounted and complex signals
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Clarify "very short duration" definition within the signal sighting standard
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Identify and retrospectively review locations affected by "very short duration" ambiguity
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Clarify "overhead line equipment" in signal sighting standard to mean wires and droppers
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Define acceptable limits for temporary signal obscuration in sighting standards
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Explicitly define cab sight lines for signal positioning based on driver's eye
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Railtrack to conduct safety examination of Paddington station layout and operations.
Ladbroke Grove Inquiry
Hazardous road design
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.