Sara Green
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2015-0190
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 10 Jul 2015
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Delays of up to 24 hours in 'writing up' medical consultations risk important information being unavailable or misinterpreted, potentially harming patients.
View full coroner's concerns
MATTER OF CONCERN is as follows That a delay; of up to 24 hours, in 'writing up' the record of a medical consultation may result in important information not being available to, or easily accessible to, other healthcare professionals involved in the care of a patient, or give rise to the possibility of misinterpretation of that information; or of the information inaccurate , if it is passed on orally while waiting for the entry to be 'written up'. This gives rise to a risk of harm to the patient: ACcTION SHOULD BE TAKEN In my opinion action should be taken to develop a system, and to ensure its operation_ such that the making of medical records complies with the GMC guidelines; "You should make records at the same time as the events You are recording or as soon a5 possible afterwards" which could not possibly be more than 2-3 hours following a consultation, and certainly before the medical practitioner concerned leaves the hospital.
Responses
Action Taken
The Group Medical Director reminded Hospital Medical Directors of the requirement to ensure service user records were completed during or shortly after consultations. An entry has been made on the Healthcare Division Risk Register to ensure that the required actions are itemised and that a plan is in place. (AI summary)
The Group Medical Director reminded Hospital Medical Directors of the requirement to ensure service user records were completed during or shortly after consultations. An entry has been made on the Healthcare Division Risk Register to ensure that the required actions are itemised and that a plan is in place. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Mr Bridgman Re. Miss Sara Jane Green (deceased) I write to VOu in response to the Regulation 28 Report to Prevent Future Deaths (PFD) ad the cover letter dated Friday, 15 May 2015 that ou issued following the Inquest Touching the Death of Sara Green: You have asked that "action Is taken to develop a system, and to ensure its operation; such that the making of medical records complies with the General Medical Council Guidelines: 'You should make records at the same time as the events YoU are recording or a5 soon as possible afterwards' which could not possibly be more than
2.3 hours following consultation and certainly before the medical practitioner concerned leaves the hospital Curent practice I am advised that; as general rule, the majority of our medical staff at our Healthcare Division sites do in fact take steps to ensure that clinical records are completed during or very soon after the patient consultation. Staff recognise that thls Is good practice and helps to mlnimise the risk of relevant information not passed on and ensures a consistent approach towards the service user'$ care and treatment: However, we accept that at Cheadle, certain staff were not adhering to this practice and as a leaming organisation; we have reflected on your concerns and have taken the following steps to Improve the making of medical notes during or shortly after consultations: Actions Communications Prior to receipt of your PFD report ad based on your comments at the inquest, on Tuesday, 12 May 2015 our Group Medical Director_ wrote to the Hospital Medlcal Directors at all 42 of the Group Healthcare Division hospitals reminding them of the requirement to ensure that service user records were completed during the course of ward rounds, Care Programme Approach review meetings &d multi-disciplinary team meetings. This was followed up on Monday 18 May 2015 by a formal directive from the Healthcare Division Chief Operations Officer; to all senior managerial staff reminding them of the requirement to ensure contemporaneous record keeping during the course of rounds, Care Programme Approach review meetings and multi-disciplinary team meetings_ Priory GrouP; Fllth Roor; 80 Hammersmlih Road, London; W14 8UD Tel: 020 7605 0910 Fax: 020 7605 0911 Intooprorygroup,com MMIN prorygroup_ 7 Pncry Gcup Nu. Lruicd Urcing 2 Ihc Prlay Grouv, RroisluddOfc: Fth Hoo; 80 rnarmh Raod, Lody W1 4 &UD, Reguered h Enpuund (b 07490152. Part d the Ptbry Group cl Conpenies. Miss being Priory ward com
PRIORY GROUP OF COMPANIES At the Healthcare Medlcal Directors' Meeting heldon Tuesday 30 June 2015, staff were further reminded by Group Director of Safety, of the need to ensure contemporaneous record keeping including in relation to ward rounds, Care Programme Approach revlew meetings, multl-disciplinary team meetings, individual one-to-one consultations and assessments: A context was given for the directlve and those present were reminded of the General Medical Council guidelines I should add that during the meeting o 30 June 2015, aspects of practice were identified and shared. An example_of good practice_was raised by one_of the_Medical Directors who told her colleagues of the efficlencles and positive experiences found in response to the clinical record projected on to a screen and completed with the active Involvement of the service user ad the multi-disciplinary team during the meeting itself: This action enables the service user to see what Is being recorded ad thus helps t promote insight and his/her involvement in their care: We will consider how this practice can be rolled out across the Healthcare Dlvision in appropriate cases: Asslstive _Technology In light of your concerns; we have reviewing how we can use Information technology to enable clinicians and others to update medical records more quickly: As a starting point; tests have been carried out In relation to wi-fi capablllty, efficlency and security in those clinical meeting rooms across the Healthcare Division where the absence of fixed computer equipment prevents staff updating contemporaneous records during the consultation or shortly afterwards. The purpose of this is to facilitate use of tablet computers by staff in these rooms. Where connectivity problems were Identified these are either fully resolved or will be resolved by Wednesday, 30 September 2015. In addition, a pilot study has been undertaken at two of our hospitals different types of tablet computers for use in ward rounds, Care Programme Approach review meetings and multi-disciplinary team meetings: We expect the pilot to complete by the end of this month and depending on the findings recommendations, where appropriate we will procure any additional equipment that most effectively meets the needs of our staff, We are optimistic that having access to tablet computers should enable staff to oad medical records on to the Care Notes clinical record system during or shortly after a consultation: We expect this process to be completed by Wednesday, 30 September 2015. In meantime, where the current absence of computer access prevents immediate entry of the contemporaneous records, the meetings will continue to be documented within 23 hours following consultation, Monitorng Following the issue of your report; & entry has been made on the Healthcare Division Risk Register to ensure that the required actions are itemised and that a plan is in place to ensure that the actions are completed within the necessary timescales: register is reviewed on a monthly basis at Healthcare Division Business Review We wIll also continue to monltor how promptly our medical staff are documenting all service user consultations on an ongoing basis. Monitoring Is undertaken as part of monthly local governance ad audit arrangements: Record keeping is also routinely considered as part of medical supervision and annual appraisal; Prlory Group, Fifth Roor; B0 Hammersmith Rojd; London; W14 BUD Tcl 020 7605 0910 Fax 020 7605 0911 Inf@pilo ygroup com Mm plorygroup com 1 Priory Group No: Llmnhcc Udlna as the Pilory GIup; RexkstauOl Fm Ro; 80 Htnranth Fbad o WI4 BD: RrtbuedhEngand NJ 07480152. Part d thc Prlary Grop 0l Compjnles good being been the using and the The Meetings.
PRIORY GROUP 0F COMPANIES I do hope that this response provides you with the assurance that action has already been taken to address vour concerns and that there are plans in place to take further action where necessary. [will of course be happy to provide you with a further update if you feel that would be helpful:
2.3 hours following consultation and certainly before the medical practitioner concerned leaves the hospital Curent practice I am advised that; as general rule, the majority of our medical staff at our Healthcare Division sites do in fact take steps to ensure that clinical records are completed during or very soon after the patient consultation. Staff recognise that thls Is good practice and helps to mlnimise the risk of relevant information not passed on and ensures a consistent approach towards the service user'$ care and treatment: However, we accept that at Cheadle, certain staff were not adhering to this practice and as a leaming organisation; we have reflected on your concerns and have taken the following steps to Improve the making of medical notes during or shortly after consultations: Actions Communications Prior to receipt of your PFD report ad based on your comments at the inquest, on Tuesday, 12 May 2015 our Group Medical Director_ wrote to the Hospital Medlcal Directors at all 42 of the Group Healthcare Division hospitals reminding them of the requirement to ensure that service user records were completed during the course of ward rounds, Care Programme Approach review meetings &d multi-disciplinary team meetings. This was followed up on Monday 18 May 2015 by a formal directive from the Healthcare Division Chief Operations Officer; to all senior managerial staff reminding them of the requirement to ensure contemporaneous record keeping during the course of rounds, Care Programme Approach review meetings and multi-disciplinary team meetings_ Priory GrouP; Fllth Roor; 80 Hammersmlih Road, London; W14 8UD Tel: 020 7605 0910 Fax: 020 7605 0911 Intooprorygroup,com MMIN prorygroup_ 7 Pncry Gcup Nu. Lruicd Urcing 2 Ihc Prlay Grouv, RroisluddOfc: Fth Hoo; 80 rnarmh Raod, Lody W1 4 &UD, Reguered h Enpuund (b 07490152. Part d the Ptbry Group cl Conpenies. Miss being Priory ward com
PRIORY GROUP OF COMPANIES At the Healthcare Medlcal Directors' Meeting heldon Tuesday 30 June 2015, staff were further reminded by Group Director of Safety, of the need to ensure contemporaneous record keeping including in relation to ward rounds, Care Programme Approach revlew meetings, multl-disciplinary team meetings, individual one-to-one consultations and assessments: A context was given for the directlve and those present were reminded of the General Medical Council guidelines I should add that during the meeting o 30 June 2015, aspects of practice were identified and shared. An example_of good practice_was raised by one_of the_Medical Directors who told her colleagues of the efficlencles and positive experiences found in response to the clinical record projected on to a screen and completed with the active Involvement of the service user ad the multi-disciplinary team during the meeting itself: This action enables the service user to see what Is being recorded ad thus helps t promote insight and his/her involvement in their care: We will consider how this practice can be rolled out across the Healthcare Dlvision in appropriate cases: Asslstive _Technology In light of your concerns; we have reviewing how we can use Information technology to enable clinicians and others to update medical records more quickly: As a starting point; tests have been carried out In relation to wi-fi capablllty, efficlency and security in those clinical meeting rooms across the Healthcare Division where the absence of fixed computer equipment prevents staff updating contemporaneous records during the consultation or shortly afterwards. The purpose of this is to facilitate use of tablet computers by staff in these rooms. Where connectivity problems were Identified these are either fully resolved or will be resolved by Wednesday, 30 September 2015. In addition, a pilot study has been undertaken at two of our hospitals different types of tablet computers for use in ward rounds, Care Programme Approach review meetings and multi-disciplinary team meetings: We expect the pilot to complete by the end of this month and depending on the findings recommendations, where appropriate we will procure any additional equipment that most effectively meets the needs of our staff, We are optimistic that having access to tablet computers should enable staff to oad medical records on to the Care Notes clinical record system during or shortly after a consultation: We expect this process to be completed by Wednesday, 30 September 2015. In meantime, where the current absence of computer access prevents immediate entry of the contemporaneous records, the meetings will continue to be documented within 23 hours following consultation, Monitorng Following the issue of your report; & entry has been made on the Healthcare Division Risk Register to ensure that the required actions are itemised and that a plan is in place to ensure that the actions are completed within the necessary timescales: register is reviewed on a monthly basis at Healthcare Division Business Review We wIll also continue to monltor how promptly our medical staff are documenting all service user consultations on an ongoing basis. Monitoring Is undertaken as part of monthly local governance ad audit arrangements: Record keeping is also routinely considered as part of medical supervision and annual appraisal; Prlory Group, Fifth Roor; B0 Hammersmith Rojd; London; W14 BUD Tcl 020 7605 0910 Fax 020 7605 0911 Inf@pilo ygroup com Mm plorygroup com 1 Priory Group No: Llmnhcc Udlna as the Pilory GIup; RexkstauOl Fm Ro; 80 Htnranth Fbad o WI4 BD: RrtbuedhEngand NJ 07480152. Part d thc Prlary Grop 0l Compjnles good being been the using and the The Meetings.
PRIORY GROUP 0F COMPANIES I do hope that this response provides you with the assurance that action has already been taken to address vour concerns and that there are plans in place to take further action where necessary. [will of course be happy to provide you with a further update if you feel that would be helpful:
Sent To
- Priory Group
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
10 Jul 2015
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 24th March 2014 an investigation was commenced into the death of Sara Jane Green who died whilst an in-patient at the Cheadle Royal Hospital, Cheadle on 18th March 20104, The investigation concluded with an Inquest held between 7th and 28th April 2015, The conclusion of the inquest was a Narrative Conclusion: On the 17th July 2013 Sara Green was admitted to Cheadle Royal Hospital for in-patient assessment; treatment and management following an overdose of Anadin tablets on 12th July 2013. At the date of Sara's death on 18th March 2014 she had been an in-patient at Cheadle Royal for 9 months; despite having been considered ready for discharge to 8 community placement at the beginning of October 2013, with no soon prospect of discharge either to hospital or to a community placement closer to home Sara'$ prolonged admission was consequent to the inadequate provision of Tier placements within the Humber & Yorkshire area the lack of Tier 3 community placements within the Humber & Yorkshire area a failure by those engaged in Sara'8 care to properly and expeditiously arrange and Or manage Sara'$ discharge from Cheadle Royal from October 2013 onwards; Sara's continuing admission with no soon prospect of discharge was contributory factor to act of self-harm on the evening of 18th March 2014 Which ended her life. Medical cause of death 1a) Asphyxia 1b) Ligature Compression of the neck_
Circumstances of the Death
On 17 March 2014 Sara returned to the Orchard Unit; Cheadle Royal Hospital following period of home leave which commenced on 6 March 2014_ Sara was placed on Level 2 observations on five minute intervals_ At a ward round on 18 March 2014, at 16.00 hours, the frequency of the Level 2 observations was reduced to 15 minutes, at Sara's request and in accordance with the observation prescription dated 11 March 2014, Level 2:15 observations commenced at 19.00 hours her
At about 20.55 21.00 hours Sara was found on the floor of her bedroom with the wire spiral binding taken from an A4 pad wrapped around her neck CPR was commenced and the emergency services summoned. Resuscitation was unsuccessful and Sara was pronounced dead at 22.31 hours.
At about 20.55 21.00 hours Sara was found on the floor of her bedroom with the wire spiral binding taken from an A4 pad wrapped around her neck CPR was commenced and the emergency services summoned. Resuscitation was unsuccessful and Sara was pronounced dead at 22.31 hours.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Hepatologist Oversight and Fibroscan Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.