Shannon Gee
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2015-0039
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Delays in mental health treatment occurred due to unaddressed gaps between organisational treatment thresholds and difficulties transferring medical notes, raising concerns about seamless patient care.
View full coroner's concerns
The situation now is improved from when encountered the delay in treatment to her but, on the evidence of a delay of ‘weeks’ in resolving clinical disputes as to which organisation should treat a patient is still worrying. Ideally, there should be a seamless union between the two organisations.
The fact that there is not appears to be a consequence of the maximum threshold for treatment by OSW being lower than the minimum threshold for acceptance on to the CMHT workload. Put another way, it is entirely conceivable that both OSW and CMHT may be correct in applying their respective rules as to whether a patient needs to be taken on where that patient’s presenting complaints falls between the two organisations’ rules. That may require formal guidance to resolve hence directing this letter to the Secretary in addition to the Commissioners. The difficulties set out concerning the transfer of medical notes and records appear more difficult to justify.
The fact that there is not appears to be a consequence of the maximum threshold for treatment by OSW being lower than the minimum threshold for acceptance on to the CMHT workload. Put another way, it is entirely conceivable that both OSW and CMHT may be correct in applying their respective rules as to whether a patient needs to be taken on where that patient’s presenting complaints falls between the two organisations’ rules. That may require formal guidance to resolve hence directing this letter to the Secretary in addition to the Commissioners. The difficulties set out concerning the transfer of medical notes and records appear more difficult to justify.
Sent To
- Department of Health and Social Care
- Kernow Clinical Commissioning Group
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 2
56-Day Deadline
31 Mar 2015
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 2 October 2012 I commenced an investigation into the death of Shannon Kimberley Gee aged 16 years. The investigation concluded at the end of a four day inquest on 29 January 2015. I made a determination that Shannon died as the result of an Accident.
Circumstances of the Death
Shannon was recognised as a Child in Need. Intervention by Social Care had been considered but instead her case was referred to the Children and Adolescents Mental Health Team (CAMHT.) It was identified that a large part of Shannon’s difficulties related to the fact that both her parents suffered from mental health issues. For the purposes of this letter it is the position of Mrs Gee that is relevant. The inquest heard from currently the Acting Clinical Lead for OSW. A copy of her statement is enclosed and your attention is drawn to paragraph one on page two. Of note: ‐ Due to the non-receipt of notes and records that had been requested in other cases OSW no longer routinely requested such information from CMHT; ‐ There was a gap in the provision of mental health services in that (and others) were deemed too ill for OSW yet too well for CMHT. This resulted in a stand-off and the patient not being treated as a consequence. It is right to acknowledge that the two organisations have recognised the less than desirable state of affairs. At inquest I was told that since October 2014 a four-stage process has been put in place for determining any such clinical disputes with decision-making ultimately lying with the Kernow Clinical Commissioning Group. Another witness, (no relation) told me she had experience of patients who had been through the process which she said had taken ‘weeks’ to resolve.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
GMMH and Alder Hey joint SMART audit
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Poor health and social care integration
Response officer access to case information technology
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
GMMH local structured risk assessment responsibility
Southport Inquiry
Poor health and social care integration
National guidance on SMART action points
Southport Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Data Systems for High-Risk Individuals
COVID-19 Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Proportionate Access to Linked Healthcare Records
COVID-19 Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Share Clinical Assessor Advice
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Simplify External Regulation
Infected Blood Inquiry
Fragmented NHS record access and information sharing
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.