Clive Clinton
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2014-0238
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
A care home's complaints procedure failed, preventing family concerns about poor care (e.g., hygiene, medication) from reaching senior management and placing residents at risk of harm.
View full coroner's concerns
_ (1) Evidence was given by the family of Mr Clinton that they had complained to the manager of the Care Home on several occasions about the standard of care which was being provided to Mr Clinton, namely that they would often find him drenched in urine and faeces, that his soiled bedding and clothing would be left in his room, that there were occasions when he would not receive his prescribed medication and that he would sometimes medical appointments which had been arranged for him_ (2) Evidence was also given by a representative of European Care who own the care home, confirming that although a complaints procedure exists within the organisation, the concerns of the family in this instance had not reached a senior level as should happen so that action could be taken: The
(3) My concerns relate to the apparent failings of a complaints procedure in which staff can effectively withhold concerns from senior management and the lack of information within the care home that could advise persons with concerns as to how they may direct their complaints to a more senior level of management within the organisation. In the absence of a truly robust system of complaint;, it is possible that concerns may not be addressed in a timely fashion or at all and could ultimately place residents at risk of harm.
(3) My concerns relate to the apparent failings of a complaints procedure in which staff can effectively withhold concerns from senior management and the lack of information within the care home that could advise persons with concerns as to how they may direct their complaints to a more senior level of management within the organisation. In the absence of a truly robust system of complaint;, it is possible that concerns may not be addressed in a timely fashion or at all and could ultimately place residents at risk of harm.
Sent To
- European Care
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
18 Jul 2014
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Circumstances of the Death
Deceased had been a resident at Cae Glas Psychiatric Rehabilitation Care Home where he had passed away in bed on the 21 of October 2013_
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe your organisations have the power to take such action_
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
CQC and PHSO memorandum of understanding
Morecambe Bay Investigation
Complaint record keeping failures
Quality and safety oversight
Nursing complaint investigation
Vale of Leven Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Quality and safety oversight
Comparable quality accounts
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Quality and safety oversight
Accountability for quality accounts
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Quality and safety oversight
Accountability for quality accounts
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Quality and safety oversight
Accountability for quality accounts
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Quality and safety oversight
Accountability for quality accounts
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Quality and safety oversight
Regulatory oversight of quality accounts
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Quality and safety oversight
Role of the Health and Social Care Information Centre
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Quality and safety oversight
Use of information about compliance by regulator from: Complaints
Mid Staffs Inquiry
Complaint record keeping failures
Quality and safety oversight
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.