Sopefoluwa Peters

PFD Report All Responded Ref: 2014-0206
Date of Report 8 May 2014
Coroner Andrew Tweddle
Response Deadline est. 3 July 2014
All 1 response received · Deadline: 3 Jul 2014
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Hazardous steps, poorly illuminated and without a handrail, combined with a low riverside safety barrier, created a dangerous environment, especially for intoxicated individuals.
View full coroner's concerns
In the circumstances it is my statutory duty to report t0 you: _ (1) The steps are steep, poorly illuminated, with no handrail and on the evidence are said to be particularly difficult t0 negotiate at any time even more s0 by an individual who may be under the influence of alcohol: The wall at the riverside on the path opposite the stepslalleyway is only 690 mm's high and does not create much of a safety barrier:
Responses
Durham County Council Local Authority / Fire Service
3 Jun 2014
Action Planned
The Council will install a timber barrier in the riverside footpath adjacent to the wall opposite the exit of Drury Lane. The County Council will also be undertaking a risk assessment along sections of the river bank. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Sir Re: Sopefoluwa Babtunde Peters, deceased refer to your letter dated the 8lh of May 2014 enclosingyour Regulation 28 report;, following the conclusion of the inquest into the death of Mr Peters. Careful consideration has been given to the matters of concem which you have raised in your report at paragraph 5 and the County Council's response is set out below: With reference to your concem about the steepness of the steps and lack of handrail on Drury Lane; the lane has been Inspected by the County Councils Rights of Way Officer and he Is satisfied that the steps themselves are in a good state of repair. It Is acknowledged that these steps are steep, requiring some care when descending them:. However; these steps have been in existence for a considerable period of time and to our knowledge tere has been only one previous report of a tripping or slipping accident; and that defect was rectified. It is in any event difficult to see how these could be moditied as Ihe path is too narrow to achieve any meaningful alleviation of this slpe: Tuming to the provision of handrails; as mentioned in previous correspondance, due to the narrowness of the path it would be difficult to install a handrail, because this would further reduce the width, which could be viewed as an obstecle by some footpath users In any event the hand rails would need to be attached to the abutling walls, which are not wilhin the County Council's ownership: The walls have been inspected and are considered to be unsuitable for attaching ralls of thls nature to because of their age, and in places the walls are in fraglle condition. continuedl. Durham County Council, County Hall; Durham DH1 5UQ Telephone: 03000 260000 wdurham gov:uk IGO %it Councilof the Year steps very fairly '

Whilst lighting Ihe location may assist, It would result in a Iit area leading to unlit riverside paths, creating greater contrast between areas of light and dark. It is fell that lighting all the riverbank paths wouid be both impractical and inappropriate due to the detrimental effect on the setting of the World Heritage Site. On balance it is not considered helpful t0 light this location; can confim that whilst no action is being proposed in respect of the above mentioned matters, the Council will be Installing a timber barrier in the riverside footpath, adjacent t the wall opposite the exit Drury Lane. The installation of a bamer should reduce any potential risk of someone falling or running down the steps and going over the wall into the river at this location: This barrier will be placed wilhin the footpath itself; as the path Is within the control of the County Council: It Is anticipated that this barrier will be installed within the next two weeks: The County Council will also be undertaking a risk assessment along sections of the rver bank: This assessment will include representatives from the police who will identify locations: from their local knowledge of where there Is a volume of evening and night time activity: further risks are identified these will be assessed and action will be taken by the County Council to minimise such risks as is considered appropriate: This was a tragic case which highlights young adults, in particular can come to ham when they are traveliing alone at night significantly under the influence of alcohol which Is an intrinsicaily perilous state; Addressing the risks caused by alcohol Is & priority of this council and its partner agencies and attach links to the Alcohol Ham Reduction Strategy: the County Durham Safe partnership pages on alcohol reductions and links to work being carried out in the city centre. htpxhu durhamgov ukpagee/senice aspx?Sericeid_8108 hpcountvdumampartnershp co ukPage:ISDP AlcoholendDnugs aspx httpxhcountvdumambestbamone co uklpagesINightSafelnitialives espX
Sent To
  • Durham County Council
Response Status
Linked responses 1 of 1
56-Day Deadline 3 Jul 2014
All responses received
About PFD responses

Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.

Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary

Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 17"h of December 2013 | commenced an investigation into the death of Sopefoluwa Babtunda Peters, 20 years old. The investigation concluded at the end of the Inquest on 9lh of April 2014 The conclusion of the inquest was Accidental Death_
Circumstances of the Death
Mr Sope Peters who died on the 30" of October 2013 by drowning in the River Wear is Iikely to have entered the river after falling into the river after descending steep steps in an area known as Drury Lane, Durham to the riverside path: He was under the influence of alcohol at (he time_
Action Should Be Taken
In my opinion action should be taken to prevent future deaths and believe your organisation have the power to take such actlon.
Related Inquiry Recommendations

Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes

Replace Buried Metallic LPG Pipes
ICL Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
New LPG Safety Regime
ICL Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
LPG Supplier Registration
ICL Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Polyethylene Piping Research
ICL Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Limit perimeter fencing height to a maximum of 2.2 metres
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Paint and mark all emergency gates in fences with "Emergency Exit
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Keep all perimeter fence gates to pitch unlocked and open during matches
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards
Annually inspect all crush barriers for corrosion; repair or replace as needed
Taylor Inquiry
Public Infrastructure Physical Hazards

Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.