Bertha Cray
PFD Report
All Responded
Ref: 2014-0037
All 1 response received
· Deadline: 21 Mar 2014
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Inadvertent alteration of 'nil by mouth' signage is possible due to easily turned double-sided signs and an unclear cause of previous alteration, risking recurrence.
View full coroner's concerns
During the course of the inquest the evidence revealed matters giving rise to concern. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. (1) On the account provided by the nursing staff, it is possible that inadvertent alteration of ‘nil by mouth’ signage could occur in the future, due to the apparent ease with which a doublesided sign can be turned and lack of action taken as a consequence of this clinical incident.
(2) On the account provided by the family, the ‘nil by mouth’ sign was replaced by some other means. The cause of this alteration is unclear, owing to the focus of the incident form being the ‘doublesided’ account, provided by the nursing staff. As such, it is possible that there could be a recurrence of this incident, as the cause has not been elucidated.
(2) On the account provided by the family, the ‘nil by mouth’ sign was replaced by some other means. The cause of this alteration is unclear, owing to the focus of the incident form being the ‘doublesided’ account, provided by the nursing staff. As such, it is possible that there could be a recurrence of this incident, as the cause has not been elucidated.
Responses
Action Taken
The Trust has stopped using double-sided 'nil-by-mouth' signs with different instructions on each side, and will now issue signs with the same instruction on both sides. The family has been informed of the outcome of the investigation and seemed reassured by the changes made by the Trust. (AI summary)
The Trust has stopped using double-sided 'nil-by-mouth' signs with different instructions on each side, and will now issue signs with the same instruction on both sides. The family has been informed of the outcome of the investigation and seemed reassured by the changes made by the Trust. (AI summary)
View full response
Dear Sir
Inquest - Ms Bertha Cray
I write in response to your Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths, dated 24 January 2014.
I am pleased to inform you that the investigation into your concerns regarding the ease of alteration of double- sided ‘nil-by-mouth’ signs at the bedside, as well the cause of the alteration, has now been concluded.
I am satisfied that this investigation has been sufficiently robust, in that we have scrutinised all relevant records, interviewed staff and have spoken with the family of Ms Cray to discuss their concerns and inform our investigation.
During the investigation, qualified nursing staff confirmed that the use of double-sided ‘nil-by-mouth’/’sips of water’ signs at the bedside was not the usual practice in the Trust. In this particular case, ‘sips of water’ had been written on the other side of the sign. This practice will now stop and new signs issued with the same instruction on both sides, so there is no option to amend the signs by writing on them.
As to the cause of alteration of the sign, the nurse involved was interviewed and explained that the ‘nil-by- mouth’ side of the sign was printed, whilst the writing on the other side was in green. This may explain why Ms Cray’s family gave evidence that there were two different signs.
We have taken this as an opportunity to review our processes to enhance future care. The family has been informed of the outcome of the investigation and seemed reassured by the changes made by the Trust.
Thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention. I hope you are assured I have taken them seriously and investigated them appropriately.
Inquest - Ms Bertha Cray
I write in response to your Regulation 28: Report to Prevent Future Deaths, dated 24 January 2014.
I am pleased to inform you that the investigation into your concerns regarding the ease of alteration of double- sided ‘nil-by-mouth’ signs at the bedside, as well the cause of the alteration, has now been concluded.
I am satisfied that this investigation has been sufficiently robust, in that we have scrutinised all relevant records, interviewed staff and have spoken with the family of Ms Cray to discuss their concerns and inform our investigation.
During the investigation, qualified nursing staff confirmed that the use of double-sided ‘nil-by-mouth’/’sips of water’ signs at the bedside was not the usual practice in the Trust. In this particular case, ‘sips of water’ had been written on the other side of the sign. This practice will now stop and new signs issued with the same instruction on both sides, so there is no option to amend the signs by writing on them.
As to the cause of alteration of the sign, the nurse involved was interviewed and explained that the ‘nil-by- mouth’ side of the sign was printed, whilst the writing on the other side was in green. This may explain why Ms Cray’s family gave evidence that there were two different signs.
We have taken this as an opportunity to review our processes to enhance future care. The family has been informed of the outcome of the investigation and seemed reassured by the changes made by the Trust.
Thank you for bringing your concerns to my attention. I hope you are assured I have taken them seriously and investigated them appropriately.
Sent To
- Barts Health NHS Trust
Response Status
Linked responses
1 of 1
56-Day Deadline
21 Mar 2014
All responses received
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
The investigation into the death of Bertha CRAY, aged 84, was commenced on 4 January 2013 and concluded at the end of the inquest on 22 January 2014. The conclusion of the inquest was narrative (Copy attached).
Circumstances of the Death
Bertha CRAY underwent an uppergastrointestinal endoscopy on 11 December 2012 at Newham General Hospital. During this procedure her oesophagus was perforated. She was subsequently transferred to The Royal London Hospital where conservative (nonsurgical) management was initially undertaken. She was placed ‘nil by mouth’ in order to allow the perforation to heal. On 15th December the ‘nil by mouth’ sign was noted to have been changed to a sign which indicated that she could take ‘sips’ of water. A jug of water had therefore been provided by the kitchen staff. At the inquest there was conflicting evidence regarding how the sign came to be changed. Evidence from the nursing staff was that the sign was doublesided (comprising ‘nil by mouth’ on one side and ‘sips’ on the other) and had inadvertently been turned. The family were clear that the signs were singlesided, of different colours and could not have been inadvertently changed. There was also conflicting evidence as to whether Mrs Cray did ingest any water; the nursing staff provided evidence that she had not taken any sips, whilst the family were clear that she had. Evidence from the treating surgeon indicated that ingestion of a small volume of water is unlikely to have significantly contributed to Mrs Cray’s death. An incident form was completed but did not demonstrate that any action had been taken as a consequence of the investigation. Mrs Cray subsequently deteriorated and, despite surgical intervention, died on 29 December 2012 from bronchopneumonia, which resulted from the perforation and surgical treatment.
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
Healthcare trust risk information visibility
Southport Inquiry
Inaccurate and inaccessible patient records
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.