Quality of Ministerial Advice
A lesson from the RHI experience is that action is needed to raise and sustain the quality of advice to Ministers and the clarity with which it is expressed. Options must be properly evaluated and, at the point of formal decisions, advice must be clear, comprehensive and impartial. Risks should be clearly and realistically stated, with an account of the implementation challenges and how the policy will work on the ground. In particular, when relevant because of the nature of the policy, Ministers should be informed at the outset of how the initiative may be suspended or closed if it gets into difficulty. Ministers should in future expect, and Departments should put in place systems to ensure, that officials provide regular and accurate information about how implementation is working in practice, especially when a third party is involved in implementing and/or administering a scheme or policy.
How was this assessed?
Response
Accepted
Response
Accepted[Note: The NI Executive responded to recommendations 1-4 together as a group under the 'Policy Development' theme.] NI Executive Response (October 2021): These recommendations can be accepted in full. Some elements are addressed in existing guidance, including: the role of the Senior Responsible Officer in respect of the delivery of a project or programme; existing Business Case guidance; the obligation upon civil servants under their Code of Ethics to provide objective and impartial advice, and to give Ministers all the facts; departmental systems to set priorities and targets (consistent with the PfG) to report progress against key targets. They have been addressed in work to date through: the review of recruitment and selection policies and practices as part of the NICS People Strategy; the Review of Business Case and Expenditure Approval processes. Further work is required to: reflect key principles in the guidance relating to policy making, Business Cases, Project Management including Gateway guidance, and risk-management; address the knowledge and skills of those in policy roles, including training with an emphasis on modelling and testing, by conducting a fundamental review of the Practical Guide to Policy Making through the Policy Champions' Network, and follow through to the Policy Skills Guide and policy-skills training offer; embed NICS ethical standards; ensure financial and non-financial performance target reporting to the Minister, including outside the budget period.
Progress Timeline
NIAO Second Progress Report (October 2024): Implemented. Quality of ministerial advice addressed through Making a Difference policy guide and associated training for officials. The NIAO's previous Implemented assessment has been maintained.