L6 Response Accepted in Part AI-assessed

Funding Settlement

Recommendation

Funding for the system should be settled in agreement between the industry and the Board, taking into account the cost of fulfilling the obligations of the regulator and the commercial pressures on the industry. There should be an indicative budget which the Board certifies is adequate for the purpose. Funding settlements should cover a four or five year period and should be negotiated well in advance.

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
According to IPSO records from February 2025, the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) is funded by a levy on the press industry, with funding agreed between IPSO and its members. However, there is no independent certification that the budget is adequate for the regulator's obligations, and IPSO has not conducted a standards investigation or imposed a fine in over 10 years, raising questions about the effectiveness of the funding for genuine regulation, and according to the Prime Minister's November 2012 statement (https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/david-cameron-statement-in-response-to-the-leveson-inquiry-report) he had accepted the principle of independent self-regulation funding but rejected statutory underpinning.
How was this assessed?
Assessed by gemini-2.5-flash on 19 Mar 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk
Jurisdiction
UK-wide
Response
Accepted in Part
Accepted in Part UK Government
29 Nov 2012

The Prime Minister stated on 29 November 2012 that he accepted "the principles that Lord Justice Leveson has laid out" for independent self-regulation, including "an independent board, a standards code, an arbitration service and the power to demand up-front, prominent apologies and impose million-pound fines." However, he rejected statutory underpinning, expressing "serious concerns and misgivings" about crossing "the Rubicon of writing elements of press regulation into the law of the land." The Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press was granted on 30 October 2013, establishing the Press Recognition Panel as the recognition body. IPSO was established in September 2014 but has not sought Royal Charter recognition. IMPRESS was recognised by the PRP in October 2016. Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/david-cameron-statement-in-response-to-the-leveson-inquiry-report

Read Full Response
Note: PM David Cameron responded to all 92 recommendations with a single statement accepting them "in principle" or "in part". No per-recommendation response was published.
Published Evidence

Published assessments of implementation progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Check the source type badge to see whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.

Reasonable Progress
27 Feb 2025
IPSO Other

IPSO is funded by the press industry through a levy. Funding is agreed between IPSO and its members. However there is no independent certification that the budget is adequate for the regulator's obligations -- IPSO has never conducted a standards investigation or imposed a fine in over 10 years, raising questions about whether funding is adequate for genuine enforcement.

View detailed findings

Funding settlement exists but the regulator's complete failure to use enforcement powers (zero fines, zero standards investigations 2014-2024) raises questions about whether funding is adequate for genuine regulation.

Hacked Off - The Watchdog That Won't Bite View Source
Source
Report An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press 29 Nov 2012
Responsible Bodies
Press Primary
Recommendation age 13.3 yrs
Last formal update 4863 days ago