L23 Response Accepted in Part AI-assessed

Coverage of News Publishers

Recommendation

A new system of regulation should not be considered sufficiently effective if it does not cover all significant news publishers.

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
According to the Press Recognition Panel's February 2025 report (PRP / IPSO, 2025-02-27), while IPSO covers most major national newspapers, significant publishers remain outside any recognised regulatory system. According to the Press Recognition Panel's February 2025 report (PRP / IPSO, 2025-02-27), the current system is not "sufficiently effective" as it does not cover all significant news publishers, with major publishers split between IPSO, IMPRESS, or unregulated.
How was this assessed?
Assessed by gemini-2.5-flash on 19 Mar 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk
This recommendation requires implementation across many organisations. The assessment reflects central policy response, not adoption in individual organisations.
Jurisdiction
UK-wide
Response
Accepted in Part
Accepted in Part UK Government
29 Nov 2012

The Prime Minister stated on 29 November 2012 that he accepted "the principles that Lord Justice Leveson has laid out" for independent self-regulation, including "an independent board, a standards code, an arbitration service and the power to demand up-front, prominent apologies and impose million-pound fines." However, he rejected statutory underpinning, expressing "serious concerns and misgivings" about crossing "the Rubicon of writing elements of press regulation into the law of the land." The Royal Charter on Self-Regulation of the Press was granted on 30 October 2013, establishing the Press Recognition Panel as the recognition body. IPSO was established in September 2014 but has not sought Royal Charter recognition. IMPRESS was recognised by the PRP in October 2016. Source: https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/david-cameron-statement-in-response-to-the-leveson-inquiry-report

Read Full Response
Note: PM David Cameron responded to all 92 recommendations with a single statement accepting them "in principle" or "in part". No per-recommendation response was published.
Published Evidence

Published assessments of implementation progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Check the source type badge to see whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.

Insufficient Progress
27 Feb 2025
PRP / IPSO Other

IPSO covers most major national newspapers but significant publishers remain outside any regulatory system. The PRP's February 2025 report noted the system is not 'sufficiently effective' as it does not cover all significant news publishers. Neither IPSO nor IMPRESS achieves universal coverage. The fragmented landscape -- IPSO outside the Leveson framework, IMPRESS inside it but covering few major publishers -- means the recommendation for effective coverage of all significant publishers is unmet.

View detailed findings

Major publishers are split between IPSO (not recognised), IMPRESS (recognised but few major members), and unregulated. The system Leveson described as necessary has not been achieved.

PRP Annual Report on Recognition System, February… View Source
Source
Report An Inquiry into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press 29 Nov 2012
Responsible Bodies
Press Primary
Recommendation age 13.3 yrs
Last formal update 4863 days ago