F35 Response Accepted

Need to share information between regulators

Recommendation

Sharing of intelligence between regulators needs to go further than sharing of existing concerns identified as risks. It should extend to all intelligence which when pieced together with that possessed by partner organisations may raise the level of concern. Work should be done on a template of the sort of information each organisation would find helpful.

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
- The Department of Health and Social Care stated in April 2025 that a Memorandum of Understanding exists between the CQC and NHS England to facilitate intelligence sharing (DHSC and NHS England implementation update to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
- The Department of Health and Social Care stated in April 2025 that the National Quality Board and System Quality Groups serve as strategic forums for intelligence sharing between organisations (DHSC and NHS England implementation update to the Thirlwall Inquiry, April 2025).
- National guidance for System Quality Groups was published in January 2022 (National Guidance, NHS England, January 2022).
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Gemini (Google) on 30 Jun 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk
This recommendation applies across many organisations. The evidence above reflects central policy activity; adoption in individual organisations may vary.
Jurisdiction
England
Response
Accepted
Accepted Department of Health and Social Care
19 Nov 2013

The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf

Read Full Response
Note: Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.
Progress Timeline
Official Report
01 Apr 2025

DHSC and NHS England implementation update provided to the Thirlwall Inquiry (April 2025). This is the government's own account of progress, submitted to the inquiry. Reviewed extent of implementation: Implemented – Ongoing. Monitor and CQC established a Memorandum of Understanding shortly after the CQC was formed to set out information-sharing arrangements and other ways of co-working. This action predates the new regulatory framework created by the Health and Social Care Act (2012) included NHS England, Monitor and the Trust Development Authority Oversight Framework, Assurance. Since then, the functions of these bodies have been merged into NHS England with a single oversight framework which seeks to ensure the alignment of priorities across the NHS and with wider system partners including Integrated Care Boards. A focus of the new operating framework is on working collaboratively. NHS England and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) are committed to working together to deliver the statutory duty set out in the Health and Social Care Act 2012 to co-operate and to deliver their common purpose to improve outcomes for patients. Please see our response to recommendation 31 for detail on the work of the cross-organisational Joint Strategic Oversight Group, National Quality Board and System Quality Groups and Oversight Framework.

Published Evidence

Published assessments of progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Source type badge indicates whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.

limited_progress
15 Oct 2024
DHSC - Penny Dash Review of CQC

Penny Dash Review (commissioned May 2024) found significant failings at CQC. Health Secretary declared CQC "not fit for purpose". Key findings: one in five services never rated; inspection levels well below pre-pandemic levels; lack of specialist inspector expertise; 5,000 notification-of-concern backlog. CQC consulting on resetting its approach from October 2025.

Review into the operational effectiveness of the … View Source
Reasonable Progress
06 Feb 2023
Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis

Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS.

University of Birmingham: Ten years after Francis View Source
Good Progress
11 Feb 2015
UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS

Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year.

Confirmed Completed
07 Nov 2014
Legislation - CQC Fundamental Standards

New "Fundamental Standards" replaced previous CQC registration requirements from 7 November 2014. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 introduced clearer minimum standards including: person-centred care (Reg 9), dignity (Reg 10), safe care (Reg 12), staffing (Reg 18), good governance (Reg 17), fit and proper persons (Reg 5), duty of candour (Reg 20).

Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activi… View Source
Confirmed Completed
01 Oct 2014
CQC - New Inspection Regime

CQC overhauled its inspection regime in response to Francis. Professor Sir Mike Richards appointed as first Chief Inspector of Hospitals (July 2013). New methodology based on five key questions (Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led) rolled out nationally October 2014. Four-tier ratings introduced (Outstanding/Good/Requires Improvement/Inadequate). Specialist expert-led inspection teams replaced generalist compliance model.

CQC Inspection and Ratings Framework View Source
Good Progress
19 Nov 2013
UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2

Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted.

Source
Report Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry 06 Feb 2013
Responsible Bodies
CQC Primary
Recommendation age 13.5 yrs
Last formal update 484 days ago