F219 Response Accepted in Part

A regulator as an alternative

Recommendation

An alternative option to enforcing compliance with a management code of conduct, with the risk of disqualification, would be to set up an independent professional regulator. The need for this would be greater if it were thought appropriate to extend a regulatory requirement to a wider range of managers and leaders. The proportionality of such a step could be better assessed after reviewing the experience of a licensing provision for directors.

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
- The government's response in "Hard Truths" (Cm 8777, November 2013) noted this recommendation as an alternative to F218 and indicated it would proceed with the Fit and Proper Person Test approach rather than a full independent regulator (Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First, DHSC, November 2013).
- Francis presented this as an alternative option: rather than the FPPT disqualification route in F218, an independent professional regulator for healthcare managers could enforce a code of conduct. He noted the need for this would be greater if regulation extended beyond directors to a wider range of managers.
- The government's consultation "Leading the NHS" (November 2024–February 2025) considered three options: voluntary accreditation, statutory barring with professional register, or full statutory regulation. The consultation response (July 2025) chose the middle option — a statutory barring system operated by the HCPC, rather than full statutory professional regulation (Leading the NHS: Consultation Response, DHSC, July 2025).
- The statutory barring mechanism will apply to board-level leaders and their direct reports, with the HCPC empowered to bar individuals for serious misconduct. This is closer to the FPPT-plus-disqualification model in F218 than the full independent regulatory model in F219.
- Francis's suggestion that regulation might extend to a wider range of managers has not been adopted; the proposed barring system is limited to senior leaders. The consultation also invited views on a professional duty of candour for NHS managers.
How was this evidence gathered?
Evidence searched by Claude (Anthropic) on 10 Apr 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
Jurisdiction
England
Response
Accepted in Part
Accepted in Part Department of Health and Social Care
19 Nov 2013

The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" in March 2013. Key reforms included a new Chief Inspector of Hospitals, strengthened Care Quality Commission inspection regime, a statutory duty of candour, and the fit and proper person test for NHS directors. Volume 2 (Cm 8754) contains the government's detailed responses to each of the 290 recommendations. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7cd486ed915d63cc65d167/34658_Cm_8777_Vol_1_accessible.pdf

Read Full Response
Note: Government responded via "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (2014), a single document covering all 290 recommendations with a blanket acceptance. Individual recommendation responses were not broken out.
Published Evidence

Published assessments of progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Source type badge indicates whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.

limited_progress
15 Oct 2024
DHSC - Penny Dash Review of CQC

Penny Dash Review (commissioned May 2024) found significant failings at CQC. Health Secretary declared CQC "not fit for purpose". Key findings: one in five services never rated; inspection levels well below pre-pandemic levels; lack of specialist inspector expertise; 5,000 notification-of-concern backlog. CQC consulting on resetting its approach from October 2025.

Review into the operational effectiveness of the … View Source
Reasonable Progress
30 Sep 2023
UK Government - Kark Review of FPPT

Tom Kark QC reviewed the Fit and Proper Person Test in 2019 and found it essentially "does not ensure directors are fit for the post they hold, and does not stop the unfit from moving around the system." NHS England published updated FPPT Framework effective 30 September 2023 requiring standardised board-level assessments.

NHS England Fit and Proper Person Test Framework View Source
Reasonable Progress
06 Feb 2023
Academic Review - Ten Years After Francis

Research published 2023 marking ten years since the Francis Report found mixed results. Structural and legislative changes largely delivered (duty of candour, FPPR, CQC overhaul, revalidation, Freedom to Speak Up Guardians). However, cultural change not fully embedded; understaffing, fear of speaking up, and poor complaint handling persist in parts of the NHS.

University of Birmingham: Ten years after Francis View Source
Confirmed Completed
01 Apr 2015
HEE/Skills for Care - Care Certificate

Care Certificate launched 1 April 2015 as standardised induction training for all new healthcare assistants and social care support workers. Covers 15 standards (updated to 16). Implements recommendations from Cavendish Review (July 2013) and Francis Report on healthcare support worker training.

Care Certificate Standards View Source
Good Progress
11 Feb 2015
UK Government - Culture Change in the NHS

Government published "Culture Change in the NHS" (Cm 9009) reporting progress on all 290 recommendations. Key achievements: 19 hospitals placed in special measures; those trusts recruited 109 additional doctors and 1,805 additional nurses; 129 board-level changes made; excess avoidable deaths fell by 450 in less than a year.

Confirmed Completed
27 Nov 2014
Legislation - Fit and Proper Person Requirement

Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014, Regulation 5: Fit and Proper Person Requirement came into force November 2014. Requires providers to ensure directors meet fitness requirements including good character, qualifications, competence. CQC can require removal of directors.

Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activi… View Source
Confirmed Completed
07 Nov 2014
Legislation - CQC Fundamental Standards

New "Fundamental Standards" replaced previous CQC registration requirements from 7 November 2014. Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014 introduced clearer minimum standards including: person-centred care (Reg 9), dignity (Reg 10), safe care (Reg 12), staffing (Reg 18), good governance (Reg 17), fit and proper persons (Reg 5), duty of candour (Reg 20).

Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activi… View Source
Confirmed Completed
01 Oct 2014
CQC - New Inspection Regime

CQC overhauled its inspection regime in response to Francis. Professor Sir Mike Richards appointed as first Chief Inspector of Hospitals (July 2013). New methodology based on five key questions (Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive, Well-led) rolled out nationally October 2014. Four-tier ratings introduced (Outstanding/Good/Requires Improvement/Inadequate). Specialist expert-led inspection teams replaced generalist compliance model.

CQC Inspection and Ratings Framework View Source
Good Progress
19 Nov 2013
UK Government - Hard Truths Vol 1 & 2

Government published "Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) in two volumes. Vol 1 set out new actions; Vol 2 provided detailed response to each of the 290 recommendations. Approximately 204 of 290 recommendations were fully accepted.

Source
Report Report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry 06 Feb 2013
Responsible Bodies
Department of Health and Social Care Primary
Recommendation age 13.3 yrs
Last formal update 4589 days ago