Government response Department for Transport: Accepted (Jul 2026)
Delivery Cabinet Office says completed (Oct 2026)

Recommendation CR9: Cold water survivability modelling

From The Cranston Inquiry Report, published 5 February 2026.

Recommendation

HM Coastguard should examine whether it is using the most appropriate modelling for survivability in cold water. HM Coastguard should amend its existing policies to ensure that they consistently identify the key variables about which information is to be collected from people in the water. In the event that the number of people in the water makes information gathering more difficult, HM Coastguard's policies should prioritise the collection of the key variables.

Jurisdiction: England and Wales

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry asked HM Coastguard to review its cold water survivability modelling and information policies. In October 2026, the Cabinet Office reported that the recommendation had been marked as complete based on an ongoing approach, with the Maritime and Coastguard Agency establishing internal monitoring and reporting (Cabinet Office, Oct 2026). Earlier, in July 2026, the Department for Transport stated that the model used adheres to international guidance and that standard operating procedures prioritise key information collected from people in the water (Department for Transport response, Jul 2026). The department added that ongoing collaboration with the United States Coast Guard is sharing immersion data to assess whether international guidance should be updated (Department for Transport response, Jul 2026).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 16 Oct 2026. The record below is the sources' own words.

Government response

Accepted Department for Transport
16 Jul 2026
Words of: Department for Transport, Cranston Inquiry Report: Interim Response (CP 1635), July 2026

HMCG have carefully considered and confirmed it is using the most appropriate model for survivability in cold water. This is because it adheres to the internationally set guidance from the IMO within IAMSAR (Volume 2) and aligns with guidance produced from the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee. The model HMCG uses is supported by a SOP which draws upon the IAMSAR guidance to predict the time people can survive in cold water under a range of different scenarios. SOPs for people in the water group the collection of variables into who (e.g. name, age, physical condition, swimming ability and clothes), lifesaving equipment (e.g. use of life jackets), where (e.g. where they were last seen), when (e.g. when they were last seen), what (e.g. what happened to cause them to enter the water), how many and weather (e.g. sea state). For multiple people in the water, the information gathering is prioritised where required to understand how many people are in the water, if floatation devices have been deployed, has the location been identified and what is the on-scene weather, visibility, and water temperature. HMCG staff will also try to talk callers through the Float to Live advice, which guides people to control their breathing and float until help arrives. The US Coastguard is currently leading a project, working with other coastguard states, on a Probability of Survival Decision Aid (PSDA) on survivability in cold water. The aim is to gather sufficient data to establish whether a determination can be made to the IMO on whether the current IAMSAR guidance should be updated. Since 2022, HMCG has collaborated with the US Coastguard on this project and has shared all UK immersion data (such as age, sex, build, ability to swim, personal flotation devices are worn, time in the water) in support of this project. HMCG will continue to collaborate with this project and participate in any further activity related to the update of the IMO IAMSAR guidance.

How this response relates to the recommendation

Site note: Cranston Inquiry Report: Interim Response (CP 1635), presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Transport in July 2026. The words are the Department for Transport's. The paper describes HM Coastguard, the Maritime and Coastguard Agency and the Marine Accident Investigation Branch in the third person ("HMCG recognises ..."), so the site files each passage under the Department, not under the body the recommendation is addressed to.

Delivery

Cabinet Office says completed (5 October 2026)

The Department for Transport published its interim response to the Cranston Inquiry in July 2026, which included updates against this recommendation. This update noted that many of the recommendations - including this one - have been marked as complete but are necessarily based on an on-going approach, rather than having a single end point. The Department (DfT), the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA), and His Majesty’s Coastguard (HMCG) are committed to on-going learning and improvement, and will regularly review processes and practices, learning from best practice, to ensure that they are fit to meet the evolving challenges of maritime search and rescue (SAR). Due to the operational and ongoing nature of these recommendations, the MCA has established an internal process of monitoring, verifying and reporting against recommendations that are its responsibility, noting that many recommendations require an on-going approach rather than reaching a single, fixed point.

From: Cranston Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, October 2026 (data file)

Site note: The dashboard gives each recommendation its own cell. The cells for recommendations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 15 and 16 carry the same words, so the same passage is recorded on each.

Source

Report The Cranston Inquiry Report 05 Feb 2026

Responsible bodies

HM Coastguard Primary

Who has spoken

  • Department for Transport
    Response
  • Cabinet Office
    Delivery statement
Recommendation made 0.7 years ago