Government response Department of Health and Social Care: Accepted (Nov 1994)
Delivery DHSC and NHS England state no delivery position (Feb 2026)

Recommendation R12: Single written channel for serious incident reports

From The Allitt Inquiry Report, published 11 February 1994.

Recommendation

We recommend that reports of serious untoward incidents to District and Regional Health Authorities should be made in writing and through a single channel which is known to all involved (para 5.14.12)

Jurisdiction: England

Government response

Accepted Department of Health and Social Care
2 Nov 1994
Words of: Virginia Bottomley, Secretary of State for Health, in a written answer to Richard Spring MP, House of Commons, 2 November 1994

Recommendation 12. We recommend that reports of serious untoward incidents to District and Regional Health Authorities should be made in writing and through a single channel which is known to all involved. We will shortly be writing to all Regional Directors requiring them to establish lines of reporting with Chief Executives of all NHS Trusts so that there can be swift and effective reporting of any such untoward incidents.

Delivery

DHSC and NHS England state no delivery position (27 February 2026)

Since 2004, the NHS has operated a comprehensive national patient safety incident reporting system, initially the National Reporting and Learning System (NRLS) and now the Learn From Patient Safety Events (LFPSE) service. All provider patient safety incident records are collected by LFPSE and the data is available to Integrated Care Boards and NHS England. Provider incident responses should be consistent with the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework. The current overarching framework for the reporting of patient safety incidents is the Patient safety Incident Response Framework (2023).

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025)

Site note: DHSC and NHS England's own account of progress, supplied to the Thirlwall Inquiry in September 2024 and printed in the Inquiry legal team's Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version dated April 2025, published 27 February 2026). It is not a finding of the Inquiry. Their reviewed extent of implementation reads “Superseded”. Table row: section 3.2 No. 12, PDF page 19.

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

Thirlwall Inquiry legal team (15 May 2024)

In November 1994, the Secretary of State for Health said the Department of Health would shortly be writing to all regional directors requiring them to establish lines of reporting with chief executives of NHS trusts, so that there could be swift and effective reporting of any untoward incidents.

From: The Thirlwall Inquiry: Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024)

Site note: The Thirlwall Inquiry legal team's own notes on implementation, from its Review of Implementation of Recommendations from Previous Inquiries into Healthcare Issues (version of 15 May 2024). The review does not colour its Extent of Implementation cell for this recommendation green; it leaves the cell uncoloured where a recommendation was rejected, where evidence of implementation was insufficient, or where steps had been taken but implementation was not yet complete. Table row: section 3.2 No. 12, PDF page 19.

Source

Report The Allitt Inquiry Report 11 Feb 1994

Responsible bodies

Department of Health and Social Care Primary

Who has spoken

  • Department of Health and Social Care
    Response
  • DHSC and NHS England
    Delivery statement
  • Thirlwall Inquiry legal team
    Finding
Recommendation made 32.7 years ago