Recommendation 98: Increase use of criminal compensation orders
From Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report, published 19 September 2019.
Recommendation
The Ministry of Justice should consult with the Sentencing Council, the Judicial College, the Crown Prosecution Service and other relevant bodies, in order to increase the use of CCOs, where appropriate, in cases involving child sexual abuse by, among other things, implementing guidance for the judiciary and prosecutors in the Crown Courts and Magistrates' Courts.
In brief (written by this site)
The Inquiry recommended consulting relevant bodies to increase the use of criminal compensation orders. In April 2020, HM Government stated that the Ministry of Justice had consulted the Judicial College, the Sentencing Council, and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), concluding that existing judicial guidance is sufficient (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020). It also noted that prosecutors are reminded in CPS legal guidance of their role in applying for compensation orders (Ministry of Justice, Apr 2020). The government stated that it would undertake further exploration to understand the low use of these orders, after which it would consider next steps and provide the Inquiry with a substantive response (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of April 2020 (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020).
AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 19 Oct 2026. The record below is the sources' own words.
Government response
The Ministry of Justice has consulted with the Judicial College and the Sentencing Council in respect of implementing guidance for the judiciary in the Crown Court and Magistrates’ Courts, and with the CPS in respect of guidance for prosecutors. It is our collective view that the guidance referred to above is sufficient and that judges will already be aware of their sentencing powers, including the power to make a compensation order instead of, or in addition to, dealing with an offender in any other way. In addition, prosecutors will be ready to assist the court by drawing the court’s attention to its powers to award compensation and inviting them to make an order where appropriate, and if they have the evidence to do so. However, we believe it may be helpful to explore our understanding of the reasons why courts make low numbers of compensation orders in cases of child sexual abuse. For example, one reason may be that such cases are very complex and the Inquiry’s report correctly identifies that “The courts have made clear that CCOs [criminal compensation orders] should only be used in simple and straightforward cases, where the amount of compensation can easily be calculated”. As such we propose to undertake further exploration to better understand the reasons behind the low use of this power. Once we have completed this work, we will then consider what steps to take, including whether further guidance would assist. We will provide the Inquiry with a substantive response on our conclusions in due course.
Delivery
Ministry of Justice says in progress (6 April 2020)
Prosecutors are reminded of their role in applying for appropriate ancillary orders, including compensation orders, in the CPS legal guidance.
Responsible bodies
Themes and tags
Who has spoken
- Ministry of Justice
Response, delivery statement