ANG-7 Response Accepted AI-assessed

In-person interviews and home visits for police candidates

Recommendation

With immediate effect, the College of Policing, in collaboration with force recruitment, should ensure that every new candidate applying to become a police officer in any police force undergoes an in-person interview and home visit. This should be designed to provide a holistic picture of the candidate and a better understanding of the candidate's motivations for joining the police and their dedication to serving the public. In particular, this should include the following: a. An in-person interview with the candidate to ensure that face-to-face contact is made with the recruiting force before the vetting or onboarding of the candidate is progressed. b. A visit to the residence of all new candidates. This should be used as another opportunity, in advance of vetting enquiries, to engage with the candidate, relevant family members or other occupants of the residence, wherever possible. c. An integrity questionnaire, used as part of the in-person home visit, to explore fully the candidate's personal attitudes and values, including increased scrutiny of the candidate's motivations and suitability for joining the police. d. Corresponding guidance and training for home visits must be developed to ensure that the visits will enable a better sense of the candidate's character, rather than judge living arrangements or socio-economic status.

Published Evidence Summary
The following publicly available evidence relates to this recommendation:
The College of Policing accepted this recommendation by March 2024. As of October 2025, there was disagreement among Chief Constables regarding the universal implementation of home visits for every new police candidate, with the NPCC Chair stating it was unlikely all forces would implement them in full (Angiolini Inquiry Part 2 Report, 9 October 2025). A pilot was conducted with four volunteer forces, and the focus shifted to implementing home visits for specific high-risk cohorts rather than universal application.
How was this assessed?
Assessed by gemini-2.5-flash on 18 Mar 2026
Checked data held on this site (government responses, progress updates, independent evidence)
External sources searched: www.gov.uk, www.legislation.gov.uk, hansard.parliament.uk
This recommendation requires implementation across many organisations. The assessment reflects central policy response, not adoption in individual organisations.
Jurisdiction
England
Section Reference
Recommendation 7
Response
Accepted
Under Consideration Home Office Initial Response
29 Feb 2024

Home Secretary James Cleverly said: "The act of pure evil committed against Sarah shocked the nation to its core. My heart goes out to Sarah's family and to all the brave victims who came forward to help inform this report and drive change. The man who committed these crimes is not a reflection on the majority of dedicated police officers working day in, day out to help people. But Sarah was failed in more ways than one by the people who were meant to keep her safe, and it laid bare wider issues in policing and society that need to be urgently fixed. In the 3 years since, a root and stem clean-up of the policing workforce has been underway and we have made huge strides – as well as making tackling violence against women and girls a national policing priority to be treated on par with terrorism. But we will continue to do everything in our power to protect women and girls. I am grateful to Lady Elish for her meticulous investigation. Her insights will be invaluable as we move forward in supporting our police to build forces of the highest standards of integrity and regain the trust of the British public."

Read Full Response
Accepted College of Policing Follow-up
25 Mar 2024

The National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) and College of Policing has at the same time committed to addressing the remaining recommendations in Lady Angiolini's report concerning police culture and increasing the robustness of police vetting. The government will follow up with further detail on how the recommendations will be delivered in partnership with the College of Policing and NPCC in due course.

Read Full Response
Progress Timeline
Official Report
09 Oct 2025

Inquiry assessment: Disagreement among Chief Constables about home visits. NPCC Chair states "it is unlikely all forces will implement home visits in full".

Published Evidence

Published assessments of implementation progress from inspectorates, select committees, official progress reports, and other sources. Check the source type badge to see whether each assessment is independent or government self-reported.

Insufficient Progress
09 Oct 2025
Angiolini Inquiry Part 2 Report Other

Disagreement among Chief Constables about home visits. NPCC Chair states "it is unlikely all forces will implement home visits in full".

View detailed findings

Described as "the recommendation with the most difficult deadline and biggest difference in views from Chief Constables". Pilot conducted with 4 volunteer forces. Focus now on specific high-risk cohorts rather than universal implementation.

The Angiolini Inquiry Part 2 First Report, Chapte… View Source
Source
Report Angiolini Inquiry Part 1 Report 29 Feb 2024
Responsible Bodies
College of Policing Primary
Recommendation age 2.1 yrs
Last formal update 09 Oct 2025