Government response National Police Chiefs Council: Accepted (Mar 2024) Home Office: Under consideration (Feb 2024)
Delivery Cabinet Office says completed (Oct 2026)

Recommendation ANG-12: Officers held to higher standard with fettered privacy rights

From Angiolini Inquiry Part 1 Report, published 29 February 2024.

Recommendation

With immediate effect, police forces should convey to all existing and prospective officers and staff that they must be held to a higher standard of behaviour and accountability than members of the public, and that therefore their right to privacy can be fettered in certain circumstances. These circumstances include, but are not limited to: recruitment, vetting, aftercare, transfer, promotion, role change, returning to policing and maintaining standards. This is to ensure that members of the police are fully aware and accountable for the unique powers entrusted to them and the standards of professional behaviour they swear to uphold. Updated fair processing notices concerning changes to processing of personal data should be provided prior to any new processing taking place, including data-sharing.

Jurisdiction: England
Reference: Recommendation 12

In brief (written by this site)

The Angiolini Inquiry recommended notifying police personnel that their privacy rights can be fettered. In October 2026, the Cabinet Office reported that a new Code of Ethics establishes these higher standards and that Authorised Professional Practice on Vetting clarifies impingements on privacy rights, though updated fair processing notices were not mentioned (Cabinet Office, Oct 2026). In December 2025, the inquiry found that the measure had been reported complete following the publication of the code, with the College of Policing continuing to work with forces to embed it (Rt Hon. Lady Elish Angiolini LT DBE PC KC, Dec 2025).

AI-generated summary of the record on this page, checked by a second model and automatic checks, 16 Oct 2026. The record below is the sources' own words.

About this summary

This recommendation asks for cultural or behavioural change, which is difficult to verify from published sources alone. The record reflects policy commitments rather than measured outcomes.

Government response

Accepted National Police Chiefs Council
25 Mar 2024
Words of: Chief Constable Gavin Stephens, Chair of the National Police Chiefs' Council, in an NPCC news release, 25 March 2024

We have reviewed the findings and recommendations in detail and accept them all. We have a number of ongoing national improvement plans and we are assessing how these will be updated and added to in light of the Inquiry findings.

Under consideration Home Office
29 Feb 2024
Response document: Angiolini Inquiry Part 1
Words of: Home Office, Angiolini Inquiry Part 1, news story, 29 February 2024

However, the report today highlights the need for further action and the government, in tandem with policing partners, will thoroughly consider the recommendations made by Lady Elish and respond in full in due course.

Delivery

Cabinet Office says completed (5 October 2026)

A new Code of Ethics has been published. Section 2 of the Code makes clear the high standards expected of those working in policing, and Section 3 notes that ‘being a member of the policing profession’ means that higher expectations are placed on the police compared with the general public. The ‘right to privacy’ and expectation of impingement on this right is also made clear in a number of areas in the Authorised Professional Practice on Vetting.

From: Angiolini Inquiry Recommendations Dashboard, October 2026 (data file)

What other bodies have found

In their own words. These do not change the delivery statement above.

Angiolini Inquiry (2 December 2025)

1.38 Summary of progress: This recommendation was reported as complete, with the publication of the new Code of Ethics. In particular, the National Police Chiefs’ Council identified that Section 2 of the new Code makes clear the high standards expected of those working in policing, and Section 3 notes that “Being a member of the policing profession” means that higher expectations are placed on the police compared with the general public. The Inquiry was told that the College of Policing continues to work closely with forces to embed the Code. The Inquiry was also told that the ‘right to privacy’ and expectation of impingement on this right is also made clear in a number of areas in the Authorised Professional Practice on Vetting.

From: The Angiolini Inquiry Part 2 First Report: Prevention of sexually motivated crimes against women in public

Source

Report Angiolini Inquiry Part 1 Report 29 Feb 2024

Responsible bodies

National Police Chiefs Council Primary

Who has spoken

  • National Police Chiefs Council
    Response
  • Home Office
    Response
  • Cabinet Office
    Delivery statement
  • Angiolini Inquiry
    Finding
Recommendation made 2.7 years ago