LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other

London Borough of Ealing

21-015-715 · Environment And Regulation › Trees · Decision date: 07 April 2022 · View Ealing Council scorecard

Full Decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about damage caused to the complainant’s property by a tree on the public highway. This is because we cannot compel the Council to remove the tree or decide what the Council should pay towards the repairs as the courts are best placed to determine liability and calculate claims for damages.

It is therefore reasonable to expect the complainant to go to court to resolve h er claim .

The complaint

In summary, Mrs X is unhappy with the Council failure to remove a tree that is damaging her property. She would like the Council to remove the tree and repair the damage caused.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

We will not investigate as it is reasonable to expect Mrs X to take her dispute with the Council to court as a claim for damages. There is a simple procedure in the county court for dealing with small claims.

We have no powers to compel the Council to remove the tree complained of.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect her to go to court.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman