LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other

Transport for London

24-001-666 · Transport And Highways › Parking And Other Penalties · Decision date: 04 June 2024 · View Transport for London scorecard

Full Decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge Notice because it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to appeal to the Traffic Enforcement Centre and then the London Tribunals.

The complaint

Miss Y complained the Authority has failed to properly consider her representations against a Penalty Charge Notice and increased the penalty amount, threatening to send bailiffs.

Miss Y says this has caused her upset and worry and is worried about the cost particularly.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended) The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended) London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information Mr Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Miss Y has a right to submit a late statutory declaration to the Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC), asking it to remove the charge certificate for the PCN, explaining her circumstances. If the TEC accepts Miss Y’s application it can take the process back to an earlier stage, reducing the amount of the PCN and reinstating Miss Y’s right of appeal against it to the Authority initially and then the London Tribunals. Miss Y can then decide if he wishes to appeal the PCN or pay the penalty.

This is free in the initial stages and reasonable adjustments can be made where necessary for access to the service.

Consequently, as Miss Y has not provided any other reason why she cannot, it is reasonable to expect her to use this right to appeal. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.

Final decision

We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to appeal to the Traffic Enforcement Centre and then the London Tribunals.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman