LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other

London Borough of Havering

24-006-829 · Benefits And Tax › Housing Benefit And Council Tax Benefit · Decision date: 05 August 2024 · View London Borough of Havering scorecard

Full Decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an overpayment of housing benefit as there was a right of appeal to a tribunal.

The complaint

Ms X complains that the Council unreasonably pursued her for a repayment of an overpayment of housing benefit (which had been paid directly to the landlord).

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended) The Social Entitlement Chamber (also known as the Social Security Appeal Tribunal) is a tribunal that considers housing benefit appeals. (The Social Entitlement Chamber of the First Tier Tribunal)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Ms X received a letter from the Council stating that she owed £147 as overpaid housing benefit. Ms X says that this had been paid direct to the landlord and so the landlord should have to repay the amount.

Any dispute about the repayment of housing benefit can be considered by the tribunal. The tribunal is an independent body which can determine any dispute about such decisions. I see no reason why an appeal could not be made in this case and so the complaint is out of jurisdiction.

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because she could appeal to a housing benefit tribunal.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman