LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other

London Borough of Wandsworth

24-012-201 · Housing › Allocations · Decision date: 16 December 2024 · View London Borough of Wandsworth scorecard

Full Decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

The complaint

Ms X complained about the Council’s decision not to award her housing application higher medical priority when she asked for a review. She says that her son has medical needs and he is sharing a bedroom which is unsuitable.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council’s response. I have also considered the Council’s housing allocations policy.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Ms X says her current social rented home is unsuitable because she needs an additional room for her son who has a medical condition and needs access to the bathroom. She was allocated Band B priority for a 4-bedroomed house in 2023. She submitted a request for a medical review which was determined in January 2024. Her banding remained unchanged because the Council did not consider it met the threshold for higher medical priority.

The Council also considered if her case should be awarded a discretionary exceptional priority status but this was also unsuccessful.

The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether someone disagrees with the decision the organisation made.

The Ombudsman may not find fault with a council’s assessment of a housing application/ a housing applicant’s priority if it has carried this out in line with its published allocations scheme. We recognise that the demand for social housing far outstrips the supply of properties in many areas.

Final decision

We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of a housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman