LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other

Transport for London

24-022-453 · Transport And Highways › Parking And Other Penalties · Decision date: 14 April 2025 · View Transport for London scorecard

Full Decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Authority’s decision to issue a Penalty Charge Notice. This is because it is reasonable to expect Mr X to appeal to a tribunal

The complaint

Mr X complains the Authority wrongly issued a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN).

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended) London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. This is because it is reasonable to expect Mr X to appeal to the London Tribunals if he disagrees with the Authority’s decision to issue a PCN. It is the appropriate body to consider this matter.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to appeal to the London Tribunals.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman