LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other

London Borough of Hackney

25-000-564 · Transport And Highways › Parking And Other Penalties · Decision date: 22 April 2025 · View London Borough of Hackney scorecard

Full Decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a moving traffic penalty charge notice. As the matter has been considered by a tribunal, it is no longer within our legal remit.

The complaint

Mr X complains about a penalty charge notice (PCN) the Council issued after he drove into a restricted area due to not having seen a sign that he says was obstructed from his view. Mr X wants the PCN to be cancelled.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the matter. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by the complainant.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X’s partner, Miss A, as the registered keeper of the vehicle involved, appealed against the PCN to London Tribunals but the appeal was not upheld. Mr X and Miss A remain dissatisfied with the Council’s handling of the matter and would like the PCN to be cancelled.

As per paragraph three, we cannot investigate where a matter has been appealed to a tribunal. We are not able therefore to investigate the complaint about the PCN. We also have no jurisdiction over the Tribunal in respect of its decision making.

For these reasons, we cannot investigate this complaint.

Final decision

We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is not within our legal remit.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman