LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Other

Warwickshire County Council

25-001-377 · Transport And Highways › Highway Repair And Maintenance · Decision date: 28 April 2025 · View Warwickshire County Council scorecard

Full Decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that his car was damaged by a road defect which the Council had failed to repair. This is because it is reasonable for Mr B to take the Council to court.

The complaint

Mr B complains his car was damaged after hitting a road defect which the Council had failed to repair. Mr B says the Council has wrongly refused his compensation claim for the damage.

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.

The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr B.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

We do not normally investigate complaints about vehicle damage caused by highway disrepair. This is because in effect such complaints are that an organisation has been negligent.

The Council has considered Mr B’s claim for compensation but did not accept the Council is liable for the damage to his car. Mr B may pursue his claim by taking the Council to court.

The Council as a local highways authority is expected to routinely monitor the state of highways and carry out repairs where necessary. But importantly, the level of maintenance, frequency of inspection, and threshold for repair is not set out in law and is open to interpretation.

Also, a local highways authority has a statutory defence if it can show it could not reasonably have been expected to put right a defect before an incident happened.

This means the presence of a road defect at the time of an incident is unlikely to be enough on its own to prove negligence.

Only the court can decide if the Council has been negligent and whether the Council is entitled to rely on this statutory defence. Also, unlike the courts, we have no powers to enforce an award of damages.

So, I would usually expect someone in Mr B’s position to seek a remedy in the courts. I find it is reasonable for Mr B to do this.

So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Final decision

We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to take the Council to court.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman