LGO (Local Government & Social Care Ombudsman) Upheld

Leeds City Council

25-003-473 · Education › Special Educational Needs · Decision date: 09 September 2025 · View Leeds City Council scorecard

Full Decision

The Ombudsman's final decision

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about delays in producing an Education Health and Care Plan as the Council has agreed to a proportionate way to resolve the complaint.

The complaint

Mr X complains the Council avoidably delayed in assessing and producing an Education Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan).

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions a council has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended) Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

How I considered this complaint

I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.

I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

My assessment

Mr X complains he requested an EHC Plan assessment in July 2024 for his child B. He says that a final EHC Plan has still not been published. The Council in reply to his complaint explained the reasons it had EHC Plan assessment delays including problems with appointing educational psychologists.

If we were to investigate it is likely we would find fault causing the complainant injustice because the EHC Plan has not been produced within the Regulation’s timescale.

Agreed action

The Council has previously set out to us its action plan to deal with the problems it has with appointing educational psychologists and EHC Plan delays.

The Council has agreed to a symbolic payment of: £500 for the problems (distress, uncertainty and frustration) for the delay up to the date of this final decision.

£100 per month for up to six months for the problems (distress, uncertainty and frustration) until Mr X receives a decision with a right of appeal, reference or review.

This is a suitable remedy for the frustration and uncertainty caused by the delay.

Final decision

We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused to Mr X.

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman