12. Before we decide if we should investigate a complaint, we look at whether there are signs an organisation has got something wrong. We do this by comparing what should have happened with what did happen.
13. When considering the complaint, we found the Trust acknowledged in both its response and complaint handling records that it upheld Mrs I’s complaint. As a resolution, it provided an apology and suggested actions, specifically training for staff, including bank staff working on the ward.
14. We understand Mrs I feels the apology was not satisfactory. This is because she says the Trust did not acknowledge the distress, upset, and disrespect they felt as a family as a result of the care they received when their mother, Mrs A, was sadly approaching the end of her life.
15. We informed the Trust why Mrs I remained unsatisfied with its response. We also referred to our Principles for Remedy and Principles of Good Complaint Handling to explain the importance of expressing sincere regret for any resulting injustice or hardship its failings have caused. This includes acknowledging any impact there has been to a patient and their family because of service failings.
16. The Trust agreed it would provide a further apology addressing these points to Mrs I and her family.
17. We consider the steps the Trust has already taken, along with the additional apology it has agreed to provide to acknowledge the impact on Mrs I and her family, is enough to remedy the impact caused. This is in line with our Principles for Remedy and Principles of Good Complaint Handling.
18. For the reasons above, we will not be investigating Mrs I’s complaint further.
19. We are sorry to hear of the distress the Trust’s actions caused Mrs I and her family at what was undeniably a sad and difficult time. We hope this resolution gives Mrs I closure on her complaint.