SPSO (Scottish Public Services Ombudsman) Not Upheld

Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service

201002513 · Scottish Government and Devolved Administration › policy/administration · Decision date: 01 December 2012 · View COPFS scorecard
Complex police complaints

Full Decision

Summary

Mr C complained that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) (including the Lord Advocate) had failed to adequately respond to correspondence from him. Having carefully reviewed the correspondence between Mr C and the COPFS, we were satisfied that the responses he received were adequate and in line with the COPFS customer feedback policy.

Related reading

View Decision Report 201002513 as a PDF (10.81 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018

View original on SPSO (Scottish Publ… website

Other decisions involving Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Serv…

202002728 · 01 Nov 2022
C complained about the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS), regarding interactions they had before, during and after a … Upheld 201910071 · 01 Mar 2022
C complained about the way that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) dealt with their communications with them … Partly Upheld 201802649 · 01 Jun 2019
Mrs C complained that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) unreasonably delayed in investigating the death of her … Upheld 201706996 · 01 Dec 2018
Ms C complained about the service provided by the Crown Office and Procurator Service (COPFS) when they were dealing with … Upheld 201603257 · 01 Oct 2017
Mrs C complained about the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS). Mrs C was required to attend court on … Upheld View all decisions for this organisation
Source decision Back to decisions list