Summary
Mr C complained to us that staff at Forth Valley Royal Hospital had removed a cannula (a small tube inserted into the body that can be used to drain fluid or to give medication) against his will when he was being discharged from hospital. We took independent advice on the complaint from a medical adviser. We found that it had been reasonable for staff to remove the cannula, as there was a risk of infection. We did not uphold this aspect of Mr C's complaint.
Mr C also complained that the board failed to deal with his complaints about this appropriately. He had complained to a prison health centre and they sent the complaint to the board's complaints handling team to respond. However, the complaints handling team did not receive the complaint and, as a result, Mr C did not receive an acknowledgement or a response to his complaint at that time. He had to write to the board again and faced a significant delay before receiving a response to the complaint. Some of the information in the board's response was also factually inaccurate. In view of this, we upheld this aspect of Mr C's complaint.
Recommendations
We recommended that the board: issue a written apology to Mr C for the failings identified; provide evidence that they have taken steps to ensure that all complaints referred by prison health centres to their Patient Relations and Complaints Service are received and responded to; and remind complaints handling staff that responses to complaints must be factually accurate.
Related reading
View Decision Report 201500934 as a PDF (12.99 KB) Updated: March 13, 2018