Healthcare director fit person tests
35 items
2 sources
Lack of robust 'fit and proper person' requirements and ongoing assessment for directors of healthcare providers.
Cross-Source Insight
Healthcare director fit person tests has been flagged across 2 independent accountability sources:
31 inquiry recs
4 PFD reports
This issue has been identified by multiple independent accountability bodies, suggesting it is a recurring systemic concern.
Inquiry Recommendations (31)
BRIS-93 — Require managerial competence for clinicians appointed to managerial roles with training
Recommendation: Any clinician, before appointment to a managerial role, must demonstrate the managerial competence to undertake what is required in that role: training and support should be made available by trusts and primary care trusts.
Unknown
BRIS-94 — Appoint clinicians to managerial roles based solely on demonstrated competence
Recommendation: Clinicians should not be required or expected to hold managerial roles on bases other than competence for the job. For example, seniority or being next in turn are not appropriate criteria for the appointment of clinicians to managerial roles.
Unknown
BRIS-96 — Establish minimum clinical practice levels for clinicians in part-time managerial roles
Recommendation: To protect patients, in the case of clinicians who take on managerial roles but wish to continue to practise as clinicians, experts together with managers from the NHS should issue advice as to the minimum level of regular clinical practice …
Unknown
BRIS-98 — Regulatory bodies to vary professional duties for full-time managers without patient care
Recommendation: The relevant professional regulatory bodies should make rules varying the professional duties of those professionals, whose registration they hold, who are in full-time managerial roles, so as to take account of the fact that, while occupying such roles, they do …
Unknown
IHRD-14 — Clinician Competence Assessment
Recommendation: The experience and competence of all clinicians caring for children in acute hospital settings should be assessed before employment.
Gov response: Competence assessment processes incorporated into recruitment procedures for paediatric roles.
Accepted
Delivered
IHRD-75 — Independent Disciplinary Action
Recommendation: Notwithstanding referral to the GMC, or other professional body Trusts should treat breaches of professional codes and/or poor performance as disciplinary matters and deal with them independently of professional bodies.
Gov response: Trust disciplinary procedures updated to address professional code breaches independently.
Accepted
Delivered
IHRD-9 — Leadership Development
Recommendation: The highest priority should be accorded the development and improvement of leadership skills at every level of the health service including both executive and non-executive Board members.
Gov response: Review processes strengthened. Independent oversight mechanisms enhanced.
Accepted
No update 2+ yrs
F221 — Ensuring common standards of competence and compliance
Recommendation: Consideration should be given to ensuring that there is regulatory oversight of the competence and compliance with appropriate standards by the boards of health service bodies which are not foundation trusts, of equivalent rigour to that applied to foundation trusts.
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F222 — General Medical Council Systemic investigation where needed
Recommendation: The General Medical Council should have a clear policy about the circumstances in which a generic complaint or report ought to be made to it, enabling a more proactive approach to monitoring fitness to practise.
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F223 — Enhanced resources
Recommendation: If the General Medical Council is to be effective in looking into generic complaints and information it will probably need either greater resources, or better cooperation with the Care Quality Commission and other organisations such as the Royal Colleges to …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted in Part
F224 — Information sharing
Recommendation: Steps must be taken to systematise the exchange of information between the Royal Colleges and the General Medical Council, and to issue guidance for use by employers of doctors to the same effect.
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F225 — Peer reviews
Recommendation: The General Medical Council should have regard to the possibility of commissioning peer reviews pursuant to section 35 of the Medical Act 1983 where concerns are raised in a generic way, in order to be advised whether there are individual …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F226 — Nursing and Midwifery Council Investigation of systemic concerns
Recommendation: To act as an effective regulator of nurse managers and leaders, as well as more front-line nurses, the Nursing and Midwifery Council needs to be equipped to look at systemic concerns as well as individual ones. It must be enabled …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted in Part
F227 — Nursing and Midwifery Council Investigation of systemic concerns
Recommendation: The Nursing and Midwifery Council needs to have its own internal capacity to assess systems and launch its own proactive investigations where it becomes aware of concerns which may give rise to nursing fitness to practise issues. It may decide …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted in Part
F228 — Administrative reform
Recommendation: It is of concern that the administration of the Nursing and Midwifery Council, which has not been examined by this Inquiry, is still found by other reviews to be wanting. It is imperative in the public interest that this is …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F229 — Revalidation
Recommendation: It is highly desirable that the Nursing and Midwifery Council introduces a system of revalidation similar to that of the General Medical Council, as a means of reinforcing the status and competence of registered nurses, as well as providing additional …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F231 — Coordination with internal procedures
Recommendation: It is essential that, so far as practicable, Nursing and Midwifery Council procedures do not obstruct the progress of internal disciplinary action in providers. In most cases it should be possible, through cooperation, to allow both to proceed in parallel. …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F232 — Employment liaison officers
Recommendation: The Nursing and Midwifery Council could consider a concept of employment liaison officers, similar to that of the General Medical Council, to provide support to directors of nursing. If this is impractical, a support network of senior nurse leaders will …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F79 — Accountability of providers' directors
Recommendation: There should be a requirement that all directors of all bodies registered by the Care Quality Commission as well as Monitor for foundation trusts are, and remain, fit and proper persons for the role. Such a test should include a …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted in Part
F80 — Accountability of providers' directors
Recommendation: A finding that a person is not a fit and proper person on the grounds of serious misconduct or incompetence should be a circumstance added to the list of disqualifications in the standard terms of a foundation trust's constitution.
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted in Part
F81 — Accountability of providers' directors
Recommendation: Consideration should be given to including in the criteria for fitness a minimum level of experience and/or training, while giving appropriate latitude for recognition of equivalence.
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F82 — Accountability of providers' directors
Recommendation: Provision should be made for regulatory intervention to require the removal or suspension from office after due process of a person whom the regulator is satisfied is not or is no longer a fit and proper person, regardless of whether …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F83 — Accountability of providers' directors
Recommendation: If a "fit and proper person test" is introduced as recommended, Monitor should issue guidance on the principles on which it would exercise its power to require the removal or suspension or disqualification of directors who did not fulfil it, …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F84 — Accountability of providers' directors
Recommendation: Where the contract of employment or appointment of an executive or non-executive director is terminated in circumstances in which there are reasonable grounds for believing that he or she is not a fit and proper person to hold such a …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted in Part
F85 — Accountability of providers' directors
Recommendation: Monitor and the Care Quality Commission should produce guidance to NHS and foundation trusts on procedures to be followed in the event of an executive or non-executive director being found to have been guilty of serious failure in the performance …
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
F86 — Requirement of training of directors
Recommendation: A requirement should be imposed on foundation trusts to have in place an adequate programme for the training and continued development of directors.
Gov response: The government published "Hard Truths: the Journey to Putting Patients First" (Cm 8777) on 19 November 2013, responding to all 290 recommendations of the Francis Report. This followed an initial response "Patients First and Foremost" …
Accepted
14 — Review clinical leadership arrangements
Recommendation: The University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust should review arrangements for clinical leadership in obstetrics, paediatrics and midwifery, to ensure that the right people are in place with appropriate skills and support. The Trust has implemented change at …
Gov response: [A] Recommendations for the Trust Recommendations for the Trust: 1-18 1. The Morecambe Bay Investigation found that there were serious failures in clinical care at University Hospitals Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, causing avoidable harm …
Accepted
16 — Clarify manager quality responsibilities
Recommendation: As part of the governance systems work, we consider that the University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust should ensure that middle managers, senior managers and non-executives have the requisite clarity over roles and responsibilities in relation to quality, …
Gov response: [A] Recommendations for the Trust Recommendations for the Trust: 1-18 1. The Morecambe Bay Investigation found that there were serious failures in clinical care at University Hospitals Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust, causing avoidable harm …
Accepted
19 — Professional bodies review conduct of registrants
Recommendation: In light of the evidence we have heard during the Investigation, we consider that the professional regulatory bodies should review the findings of this Report in detail with a view to investigating further the conduct of registrants involved in the …
Gov response: 5. We accept this recommendation. Action is under way. 6. The General Medical Council and the Nursing and Midwifery Council have emphasised that they have reviewed the findings of the Morecambe Bay Investigation Report and …
Accepted
28 — National standards for clinical leads
Recommendation: Clear national standards should be drawn up setting out the professional duties and expectations of clinical leads at all levels, including, but not limited to, clinical directors, clinical leads, heads of service, medical directors, nurse directors. Trusts should provide evidence …
Gov response: 57. We accept these recommendations in principle. 13 http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/respond_to_risks.asp 14 http://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/code/read-the-code-online/ 58. Following the tragedies at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust there has been a renewed …
Accepted
29 — Standards for manager quality responsibilities
Recommendation: Clear national standards should be drawn up setting out the responsibilities for clinical quality of other managers, including executive directors, middle managers and non-executives. All Trusts should provide evidence to the Care Quality Commission, as part of their processes, of …
Gov response: 57. We accept these recommendations in principle. 13 http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/respond_to_risks.asp 14 http://www.nmc.org.uk/standards/code/read-the-code-online/ 58. Following the tragedies at Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation Trust there has been a renewed …
Accepted
PFD Reports (4)
Joseph Price
Concerns: Prison healthcare failed to routinely inquire about and record family history of sudden cardiac death during reception health screenings, missing opportunities to identify and screen at-risk inmates.
Responded
Peter Cole
Concerns: Inadequate monitoring of repeat medication allows vulnerable patients to accumulate dangerous quantities, a widespread problem leading to significant waste of healthcare resources.
Responded
Jack Postle
Concerns: The maternity unit suffered from insufficient capacity for safe care, and consultant guidance inappropriately limited the availability of caesarean sections following failed inductions.
Responded
Kate Louise Pierce
Concerns: A practicing GP failed to diagnose a patient and misled parents, with new evidence casting doubt on his fitness to practice. Previous GMC action stalled, posing a risk of future deaths.
Response: The General Medical Council acknowledges the concerns but states no action is proposed as their previous investigation was closed due to the five-year rule and they have received no further …
Responded