Third Report - Permitted Development Rights

Select Committee
Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee HC 32 22 July 2021
Report Status Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations 14 items (7 recs)
Government Response (AI assessment · 14 of 14 classified)
Government response
Permitted Development Rights: Government Response to the Select Committee Report · published 23 May 2023

Recommendations & Conclusions

4 results
4 Conclusion Accepted in Part
The prior approval process is the principal mechanism by which local planning authorities can control...
Conclusion
The prior approval process is the principal mechanism by which local planning authorities can control permitted development in their areas, and we welcome the recent inclusion of more criteria, but we are concerned about its increasing complexity and the consequent … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges local authority resource and complexity challenges with prior approval. It states it has consulted on fee increases for prior approval and is working with stakeholders to develop interventions to build capacity and skills within local planning authorities. It also commits to considering appropriate prior approvals when framing any new permitted development rights.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details
5 Recommendation Accepted in Part
Para 35
As we have already recommended, the Government should review the role of permitted development rights...
Recommendation
As we have already recommended, the Government should review the role of permitted development rights in the planning system. As part of that review, it should consider how to amend the prior approval process to both simplify it and give … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges local authority resource and complexity challenges with prior approval. It states it has consulted on fee increases for prior approval and is working with stakeholders to develop interventions to build capacity and skills within local planning authorities. It also commits to considering appropriate prior approvals when framing any new permitted development rights, but does not commit to a broader review of PDRs or to simplifying the existing prior approval process.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details
8 Recommendation Accepted in Part
Para 50
We broadly welcome the new use class E, as we can see the advantages of...
Recommendation
We broadly welcome the new use class E, as we can see the advantages of greater flexibility, but it should not permit development to bypass the sequential test or risk the loss of medical centres. As we have already recommended, … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government defends Class E's flexibility regarding sequential tests but notes a proposed review of town and out-of-centre development. It claims existing rights already provide protection for health centres and nurseries through local prior approval, addressing part of the recommendation without committing to specific amendments.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details
14 Recommendation Accepted in Part
Whatever the Government’s long-term plans for permitted development and the Infrastructure Levy, we recommend it...
Recommendation
Whatever the Government’s long-term plans for permitted development and the Infrastructure Levy, we recommend it legislate as soon as possible to ensure that permitted development contributes towards the cost of providing the infrastructure and affordable housing needed to offset any … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government is addressing the recommendation through the Levelling Up and Regeneration Bill, which establishes a framework for the new Infrastructure Levy. It is currently consulting on the detailed design of the Levy, including whether it will apply to permitted development rights, to ensure contributions towards infrastructure and affordable housing.
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
View Details